IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ces/econpb/_64.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Is Insufficient Supervisory Board Competence a Risk Factor for Banks?

Author

Listed:
  • Harald Hau
  • Tim-Ole Radach
  • Marcel Thum

Abstract

The downfall of Credit Suisse should serve as a lesson that supervisory board competence determines the long-term risk of a bank. In a much-cited study, we investigated the relationship between competent board supervision and the performance of German banks during the 2008/2009 financial crisis. This policy brief summarizes the results of our updated study, which shows that despite legislative efforts, there is still a long way to go. Key Messages The downfall of Credit Suisse should serve as a lesson that supervisory board competence determines the long-term risk of a bank. The relationship between competent board supervision and bank performance has been confirmed for many countries since our much-cited study of German banks during the 2008/2009 financial crisis. However, our updated study shows that despite legislative efforts, board competence in Germany has improved only slightly. In particular, public banks are lagging behind. We recommend that bank supervisors systematically measure, track, and report bank board competence.

Suggested Citation

  • Harald Hau & Tim-Ole Radach & Marcel Thum, 2024. "Is Insufficient Supervisory Board Competence a Risk Factor for Banks?," EconPol Policy Brief 64, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich.
  • Handle: RePEc:ces:econpb:_64
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ifo.de/DocDL/EconPol-PolicyBrief_64_0.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ces:econpb:_64. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klaus Wohlrabe (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifooode.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.