IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cdl/itsdav/qt19t2r64b.html

Travel Behavior in E-commerce: Shopping, Purchasing, and Receiving

Author

Listed:
  • Giuliano, Genevieve
  • Fang, Jiawen
  • Binder, Robert B
  • Ha, Jaehyun
  • Holmes, Andrea

Abstract

The growth of urban e-commerce has had enormous impacts on urban transportation and land use. Retailers are competing through free and 1-or 2-day delivery which has incentivized small-scale deliveries (small packages in small trucks) to personal residences. From an urban freight perspective, these trips are less efficient than large-scale deliveries to retail locations. However, there remain questions regarding the overall impact of online shopping on passenger travel and vehicle miles traveled (VMT). This project focuses on how delivery preferences affect individual travel behavior in California and the Greater Los Angeles Region. The research puts special emphasis on alternative delivery methods that cluster local deliveries, such as automated parcel lockers (APLs) offered by Amazon. Clustered local deliveries could reduce truck VMT while only marginally increasing passenger VMT. The research team conducted two separate but related surveys to explore the potential of APLs as an alternative for residence deliveries: The first survey examines e-shopping behavior in general; the second addresses the use of APLs. The researchers find that online shopping is ubiquitous. The pandemic increased e-shopping, expanding it to older age cohorts and more diverse products. The use of APLs is rare. Convenience is the dominant factor in the delivery choice. The potential market for APLs could be increased if there were more locations available near home or workplace. Future research directions include modeling the impact of delivery methods on passenger VMT and incorporating product returns into our understanding of APL use. View the NCST Project Webpage

Suggested Citation

  • Giuliano, Genevieve & Fang, Jiawen & Binder, Robert B & Ha, Jaehyun & Holmes, Andrea, 2022. "Travel Behavior in E-commerce: Shopping, Purchasing, and Receiving," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt19t2r64b, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    • Handle: RePEc:cdl:itsdav:qt19t2r64b
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/19t2r64b.pdf;origin=repeccitec
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cláudia A. Soares Machado & Nicolas Patrick Marie De Salles Hue & Fernando Tobal Berssaneti & José Alberto Quintanilha, 2018. "An Overview of Shared Mobility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-21, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Draženko Glavić & Marina Milenković & Aleksandar Trifunović & Igor Jokanović & Jelica Komarica, 2023. "Influence of Dockless Shared E-Scooters on Urban Mobility: WTP and Modal Shift," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-17, June.
    2. Erling Holden & Geoffrey Gilpin & David Banister, 2019. "Sustainable Mobility at Thirty," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-14, April.
    3. Eva Malichová & Ghadir Pourhashem & Tatiana Kováčiková & Martin Hudák, 2020. "Users’ Perception of Value of Travel Time and Value of Ridesharing Impacts on Europeans’ Ridesharing Participation Intention: A Case Study Based on MoTiV European-Wide Mobility and Behavioral Pattern Dataset," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-19, May.
    4. Wu, Min & Yuen, Kum Fai, 2023. "Initial trust formation on shared autonomous vehicles: Exploring the effects of personality-, transfer- and performance-based stimuli," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    5. Oliver Kunze & Fabian Frommer, 2021. "The Matrix vs. The Fifth Element—Assessing Future Scenarios of Urban Transport from a Sustainability Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-19, March.
    6. Raphael Hoerler & Fabian Haerri & Merja Hoppe, 2019. "New Solutions in Sustainable Commuting—The Attitudes and Experience of European Stakeholders and Experts in Switzerland," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-19, July.
    7. Sangveraphunsiri, Tawit & Cassidy, Michael J. & Daganzo, Carlos F., 2022. "Jitney-lite: a flexible-route feeder service for developing countries," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 1-13.
    8. Álvaro Aguilera-García & Juan Gomez & Natalia Sobrino & Juan José Vinagre Díaz, 2021. "Moped Scooter Sharing: Citizens’ Perceptions, Users’ Behavior, and Implications for Urban Mobility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-26, June.
    9. Mariana de Oliveira Lage & Cláudia Aparecida Soares Machado & Cristiano Martins Monteiro & Clodoveu Augusto Davis & Charles Lincoln Kenji Yamamura & Fernando Tobal Berssaneti & José Alberto Quintanilh, 2021. "Using Hierarchical Facility Location, Single Facility Approach, and GIS in Carsharing Services," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-13, November.
    10. Sungtaek Choi & Sangho Choo & Sujae Kim, 2020. "Is the Relationship between Transportation and Communications Industries Complementary or Substitutional? An Asian Countries-Based Empirical Analysis Using Input-Output Accounts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-21, April.
    11. Henry, Elise & Furno, Angelo & Faouzi, Nour-Eddin El & Rey, David, 2022. "Locating park-and-ride facilities for resilient on-demand urban mobility," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    12. Wei Luo & Yi Wang & Pengpeng Jiao & Zehao Wang & Pengfei Zhao, 2022. "What Kind of Travellers Are Using Carsharing in Beijing? A Study Based on Selective Ensemble Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-24, January.
    13. Wu, Min & Wang, Nanxi & Yuen, Kum Fai, 2023. "Can autonomy level and anthropomorphic characteristics affect public acceptance and trust towards shared autonomous vehicles?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    14. Sungwon Kim & Hwansoo Lee & Seung-Woo Son, 2021. "Emerging Diffusion Barriers of Shared Mobility Services in Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-16, July.
    15. Bhavana Vaddadi & Xiaoyun Zhao & Yusak Susilo & Anna Pernestål, 2020. "Measuring System-Level Impacts of Corporate Mobility as a Service (CMaaS) Based on Empirical Evidence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-18, August.
    16. Cai, Xiao & Gu, Xinyue & Silm, Siiri & Hadachi, Amnir & Jin, Tanhua & Witlox, Frank, 2025. "Differences in bike-sharing usage and its associations with station-surrounding characteristics: A multi-group analysis using machine learning techniques," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    17. Bartkowiak Paweł & Michalak Szymon & Młodzik Maciej, 2021. "Motives for and Barriers to the Use of Electric Moped Scooter Sharing Services," Marketing of Scientific and Research Organizations, Sciendo, vol. 42(4), pages 17-34, December.
    18. Ana María Arbeláez Vélez & Andrius Plepys, 2021. "Car Sharing as a Strategy to Address GHG Emissions in the Transport System: Evaluation of Effects of Car Sharing in Amsterdam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-15, February.
    19. Jessica Berg & Malin Henriksson & Jonas Ihlström, 2019. "Comfort First! Vehicle-Sharing Systems in Urban Residential Areas: The Importance for Everyday Mobility and Reduction of Car Use among Pilot Users," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-16, April.
    20. Laura C. Aguilar Esteva & Akshat Kasliwal & Michael S. Kinzler & Hyung Chul Kim & Gregory A. Keoleian, 2021. "Circular economy framework for automobiles: Closing energy and material loops," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 25(4), pages 877-889, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdl:itsdav:qt19t2r64b. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lisa Schiff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/itucdus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.