IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

The Contested Meaning of Labour Market Flexibility: Economic Theory and the Discourse of European Integration

Listed author(s):
  • Simon Deakin
  • Hannah Reed
Registered author(s):

    This paper argues that in order to facilitate informed debate and to develop a coherent social and employment policy in Europe, it is necessary to clarify the different meanings of the term 'labour market flexibility'. It questions whether the deregulation of the labour market is an inherent component of increased flexibility. The paper then examines the EU's employment strategy and argues that it must be understood in terms of its linkages to social policy on the one hand, and the process of economic and monetary union (EMU) on the other. It suggests that a coherent alternative to neoliberal policies, of the kind apparently promised by a 'Third Way' agenda for the labour market, has yet to emerge at European level. There is a danger, instead, that the institutional arrangements for the conduct of social and economic policy (broadly conceived) within the Community are making it impossible to forge the linkages between labour standards, active labour market policy and the macroeconomic framework of the kind which are needed to renew the 'European social model'. It therefore questions whether, under present institutional conditions, the goals of Third Way advocates can be met.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge in its series Working Papers with number wp162.

    in new window

    Date of creation: Mar 2000
    Handle: RePEc:cbr:cbrwps:wp162
    Note: PRO-2
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cbr:cbrwps:wp162. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Ruth Newman and Georgie Cohen)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.