Economic Organization, Distribution And The Equality Issue: The Marx-Engels Perspective
My first concern is the treatment of distribution by Marx and Engels within the general framework of ‘Historical Materialism’. To set the stage I deal briefly with their rejection of egalitarian schemes based on ‘justice’ or ‘morality’ (Section II.1),and then proceed to their objections on grounds of the impossibility of divorcing distribution from conditions of production and the related exchange system. I demonstrate first that growing inequality is accorded a strategic and essential role in the evolution of a capitalist-exchange economy (II.2). (In any event, Marx and Engels seem to have downplayed the quantitative significance for labour even of major transfers.) That the pattern of distribution could not be altered unilaterally without damaging consequences for production, is then shown to govern their hostility to schemes of Communist organization entailing wages paid according to‘equal right’ and ‘the undiminished proceeds of labour’ (II.3). In brief, Marx’s Communism in its first phase (sometimes referred to as the Socialist phase), when there remains a residual influence exerted by the preceding institution 1 , would recognize the essential inequality of labour on grounds of efficiency and growth; the celebrated dictum ‘from each according to his abilities to each according to his needs’ applied only in a utopian phase. Engels’ rendition of these themes is approached in terms of his critique of Duhring (III).
|Date of creation:||06 Feb 2002|
|Date of revision:|
|Publication status:||Published: Carleton Economic Papers|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: |
|Order Information:|| Email: |
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Howard, M C & King, J E, 2001. "Where Marx Was Right: Towards a More Secure Foundation for Heterodox Economies," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 25(6), pages 785-807, November.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:car:carecp:02-05. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Renee Lortie)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.