IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cam/camdae/2535.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Iberian Exception: What was the Cost of Distorting Electricity Markets During the 2021-23 European Energy Crisis?

Author

Listed:
  • Lou, H. K.
  • Pollitt, M. G.
  • Robinson, R.
  • Arcos, A. V.

Abstract

European wholesale power prices increased to an unprecedented level during the energy crisis in 2022. To tackle the adverse impact on consumers, Spain and Portugal implemented the Iberian Exception (IE) in June 2022, intending to decouple power prices from the rest of Europe to reduce consumer energy bills. The IE posed challenges and questions, including the impact of foreign demand for Spanish electricity, whether the policy would subsidise French power prices, and whether it would reduce energy bills for consumers. Given that this was a policy implemented in the middle of a continental gas supply crisis, we focus on the direct impact of the policy on gas demand in Spain and in Europe. This is interesting because other aspects of the IE – such as reducing consumer bills - could have been, and in other countries were, addressed by other policies. The ‘exception’ was allowed by the European Commission (on behalf of the EU27) because it was deemed to be likely to have a limited pan-European impact on electricity prices. By contrast, Spain competes directly with other European countries for LNG supplies on the global gas market and hence large effects in Spain would necessarily spillover to gas prices in the rest of Europe. Our findings suggested that IE successfully lowered the fossil fuel bids with a secondary effect of decoupling the Spanish power markets from France. Decoupled observations increased by +59.2% compared with our reference period. Even the border between Spain and Portugal was decoupled slightly by +0.9%. Daily net outflow to France increased by 2.3 GWh daily. Daily net outflow to Morocco increased 32 times, and outflow to Andorra increased by 25%. The power outflow increased the domestic electricity price by 24.8%, relative to the effect in the absence of interconnection. We also simulated the counterfactual scenario by investigating wholesale electricity prices without the subsidy paid to gas generators. Our demand and supply adjustment scenario shows that the subsidy reduced Iberian electricity day-ahead prices by 35.3%. The model was further used to compare the gas-fired generation between June 2022 and February 2023, when the gas price was above the gas cap. Depending on the scenarios, IE increased the Iberian gas burnt by 19.2%; On the EU level, gas burnt also increased by 1.3%. The total Iberian foreign demand also increased gas for power burnt by +5.47% in Iberia (+0.81% across the EU), relative to the effect in the absence of interconnection.

Suggested Citation

  • Lou, H. K. & Pollitt, M. G. & Robinson, R. & Arcos, A. V., 2025. "The Iberian Exception: What was the Cost of Distorting Electricity Markets During the 2021-23 European Energy Crisis?," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 2535, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
  • Handle: RePEc:cam:camdae:2535
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econ.cam.ac.uk/sites/default/files/publication-cwpe-pdfs/cwpe2535.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael G. Pollitt, 2019. "The European Single Market in Electricity: An Economic Assessment," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 55(1), pages 63-87, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Keppler, Jan Horst & Quemin, Simon & Saguan, Marcelo, 2022. "Why the sustainable provision of low-carbon electricity needs hybrid markets," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    2. Chen, Hao & Cui, Jian & Song, Feng & Jiang, Zhigao, 2022. "Evaluating the impacts of reforming and integrating China's electricity sector," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    3. Lyu, Chenyan & Do, Hung Xuan & Nepal, Rabindra & Jamasb, Tooraj, 2024. "Volatility spillovers and carbon price in the Nordic wholesale electricity markets," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    4. Luis R. Boscán, 2020. "European Union retail electricity markets in the Green Transition: The quest for adequate design," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 9(1), January.
    5. Steven M. Smith, 2019. "The Relative Economic Merits of Alternative Water Rights," Working Papers 2019-08, Colorado School of Mines, Division of Economics and Business.
    6. Alessandro Sciullo & Gregory Winston Gilcrease & Mario Perugini & Dario Padovan & Barbara Curli & Jay Sterling Gregg & Osman Arrobbio & Erika Meynaerts & Sarah Delvaux & Lucia Polo-Alvarez & Chiara Ca, 2022. "Exploring Institutional and Socio-Economic Settings for the Development of Energy Communities in Europe," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-22, February.
    7. Bert Willems & Juulia Zhou, 2020. "The Clean Energy Package and Demand Response: Setting Correct Incentives," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-19, October.
    8. Willems, Bert & Pollitt, Michael & von der Fehr, Nils-Henrik & Banet, Catherine, 2022. "The European Wholesale Electricty Market: From Crisis to Net Zero," Other publications TiSEM 2f225964-853e-4d30-a46d-0, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    9. Do, Hung Xuan & Nepal, Rabindra & Jamasb, Tooraj, 2020. "Electricity market integration, decarbonisation and security of supply: Dynamic volatility connectedness in the Irish and Great Britain markets," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    10. Rodríguez-Sarasty, Jesús A. & Debia, Sébastien & Pineau, Pierre-Olivier, 2021. "Deep decarbonization in Northeastern North America: The value of electricity market integration and hydropower," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    11. Radulescu, Doina & Sulger, Philippe, 2022. "Interdependencies between countries in the provision of energy," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    12. Osińska, Magdalena & Kyzym, Mykola & Khaustova, Victoriia & Ilyash, Olha & Salashenko, Tetiana, 2022. "Does the Ukrainian electricity market correspond to the european model?," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    13. Brittany Tarufelli & Ben Gilbert, 2019. "Leakage in Regional Climate Policy? Implications of Electricity Market Design," Working Papers 2019-07, Colorado School of Mines, Division of Economics and Business, revised Dec 2021.
    14. Finn Roar Aune and Rolf Golombek, 2021. "Are Carbon Prices Redundant in the 2030 EU Climate and Energy Policy Package?," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 3), pages 225-264.
    15. Michael G. Pollitt & Karim L. Anaya, 2021. "Competition in Markets for Ancillary Services? The Implications of Rising Distributed Generation," The Energy Journal, , vol. 42(1_suppl), pages 1-2, June.
    16. Montoya, L.G. & Guo, B. & Newbery, D. & Dodds, P.E. & Lipman, G. & Castagneto Gissey, G., 2020. "Measuring inefficiency in international electricity trading," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    17. Perillo, Frederico & Pereira da Silva, Patrícia & Cerqueira, Pedro A., 2022. "Decoupling efficiency from electricity intensity: An empirical assessment in the EU," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    18. Percebois, Jacques & Pommeret, Stanislas, 2021. "Efficiency and dependence in the European electricity transition," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    19. Farhad Taghizadeh-Hesary & Ehsan Rasoulinezhad & Han Phoumin, 2022. "Ways to achieve universal access to sustainable electricity in Southeast Asia," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 55(4), pages 2031-2050, November.
    20. Pollitt, M. & Dale, L., 2018. "Restructuring the Chinese Electricity Supply Sector - How industrial electricity prices are determined in a liberalized power market: lessons from Great Britain," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 1871, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • L94 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Transportation and Utilities - - - Electric Utilities

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cam:camdae:2535. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jake Dyer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.econ.cam.ac.uk/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.