IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/bon/boncrc/crctr224_2025_748.html

Perfect Bayesian Equilibria and Cross-Pair Independence from Common Actions

Author

Listed:
  • Francesc Dilmé

Abstract

This paperdevelopsasimplenotionofperfectBayesianequilibriumforarbitraryfiniteextensive form games with perfect recall. Its key ingredient is cross-pair independence from common actions, a belief restriction that compares the likelihoods of two pairs of histories, possibly in different information sets, after canceling actions common to both pairs. The condition extends Bayes’ rule whenever possible and no signaling what you don’t know beyond sequentially ordered information sets. In multi-stage games with observable actions and independent types, it implies the belief-reasonableness requirements of Fudenberg and Tirole (1991). Extending the same cancellation logic to arbitrary multisets is equivalent to consistency. The construction therefore provides a tractable, assessment-based notion of reasonableness without non standard probabilities, plausibility orders, or auxiliary belief-revision structures.

Suggested Citation

  • Francesc Dilmé, 2026. "Perfect Bayesian Equilibria and Cross-Pair Independence from Common Actions," CRC TR 224 Discussion Paper Series crctr224_2025_748, University of Bonn and University of Mannheim, Germany.
  • Handle: RePEc:bon:boncrc:crctr224_2025_748
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.crctr224.de/research/discussion-papers/archive/dp748
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • C72 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory - - - Noncooperative Games
    • C73 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory - - - Stochastic and Dynamic Games; Evolutionary Games
    • D82 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Asymmetric and Private Information; Mechanism Design
    • D83 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Search; Learning; Information and Knowledge; Communication; Belief; Unawareness

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bon:boncrc:crctr224_2025_748. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CRC Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.crctr224.de .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.