IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/bdi/opques/qef_76_10.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Lessons learned from the financial crisis for financial stability and banking supervision

Author

Listed:
  • Alessio De Vincenzo

    (Banca d'Italia)

  • Maria Alessandra Freni

    (Banca d'Italia)

  • Andrea Generale

    (Banca d'Italia)

  • Sergio Nicoletti Altimari

    (Banca d'Italia)

  • Mario Quagliariello

    (Banca d'Italia)

Abstract

The financial crisis that began in 2007 has revealed a need for a new supervisory and regulatory approach aimed at strengthening the system and containing the risk of future financial and economic disruptions. Three ingredients are needed to ensure financial stability: robust analysis, better regulation, and international cooperation. First, financial stability analysis must be improved to take full account of the different sources of systemic risk. Data coverage of the balance sheets of both non-bank financial institutions and the non-financial sectors should be increased. Moreover, to address the problems raised by the interconnections among financial institutions more granular and timely information on their exposures is needed. There must be further integration of macro- and micro-information and an upgrading of financial stability models. The second ingredient is the design of robust regulatory measures. Under the auspices of the G20 and the Financial Stability Board, the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision recently put forward substantial proposals on capital and liquidity. They will result in more robust capital base, lower leverage, less cyclical capital rules and better control of liquidity risk. Finally, the third ingredient is strong international cooperation. Ensuring more effective exchanges of information among supervisors in different jurisdictions and successful common actions is key in preserving financial integration, while avoiding negative cross-border spill-overs. Better resolution regimes are part of the efforts to ensure that the crisis of one institution does not impair the ability of the financial markets to provide essential services to the economy.

Suggested Citation

  • Alessio De Vincenzo & Maria Alessandra Freni & Andrea Generale & Sergio Nicoletti Altimari & Mario Quagliariello, 2010. "Lessons learned from the financial crisis for financial stability and banking supervision," Questioni di Economia e Finanza (Occasional Papers) 76, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
  • Handle: RePEc:bdi:opques:qef_76_10
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.bancaditalia.it/pubblicazioni/qef/2010-0076/QEF_76.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Vedev, A., 2013. "Mega-Regulator for Russia as an Institutional Problem and an Intellectual Challenge," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 19(3), pages 139-143.
    2. Lorenzo Esposito & Giuseppe Mastromatteo, 2020. "Profitti, rischi e capital ratios: come sviluppare una vigilanza prudenziale neutrale al risk-appetite delle banche (Profits, risk, and capital ratios: how to design a prudential supervision neutral w," Moneta e Credito, Economia civile, vol. 73(290), pages 141-154.
    3. Meier, Samira & Rodriguez Gonzalez, Miguel & Kunze, Frederik, 2021. "The global financial crisis, the EMU sovereign debt crisis and international financial regulation: lessons from a systematic literature review," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    financial crisis; international cooperation; macroprudential analysis; procyclicality; prudential regulation; stress tests;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G01 - Financial Economics - - General - - - Financial Crises
    • G18 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Government Policy and Regulation
    • G28 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Government Policy and Regulation

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bdi:opques:qef_76_10. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/bdigvit.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.