IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

Creating incentives for voluntary contributions to pension funds by independent workers: an informal evaluation based on the case of Chile

  • Eduardo Fuentes
Registered author(s):

    This study aims to establish the statistical probability that workers who are not contributing to pension funds might do so, provided with the right incentives to. Chile was used as a case study for this purpose. First, voluntary savings schemes were reviewed and compared with similar systems in the region. Based on this information, an analysis has been carried out on a number of surveys, focusing particularly on social protection, so as to examine the relationship the groups of non-contributing workers have to the systems, thereby determining what conditions might give them an incentive to save. A probit binary choice model has been used for this, as it obtains the probabilities of the different saving cohorts. With the results it is possible to conclude that workers will have grater incentive to save if it gives them access to education (in abroad sense), health services and housing. These results therefore present a challenge for the main actors in the industry (governments and pension fund managers) to explore the design of new retirement savings products associated with the benefits that the workers prefer, and thereby extending the coverage provided by the pension systems.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by BBVA Bank, Economic Research Department in its series Working Papers with number 1012.

    in new window

    Length: 60 pages
    Date of creation: May 2010
    Date of revision:
    Handle: RePEc:bbv:wpaper:1012
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bbv:wpaper:1012. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (ANGIE CAROLINA SUAREZ SALAZAR)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.