IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

Yardstick Competition when Quality is Endogenous: The Case of Hospital Regulation

  • Hanjo M. Koehler
Registered author(s):

    In many countries hospital regulation undergoes fundamental change. In reaction to steadily increasing costs, authorities switch from cost of service regulation to prospective payment systems (PPS). While it seems clear that this new scheme sets strong cost saving incentives, this is not so clear for quality provision. As a matter of fact, everything hinges on the prices the regulator sets. Figuring out optimal prices is, however, a difficult task, be- cause the regulator faces serious informational limitations. The literature largely ignores this problem and points to Shleifer's (1985) yardstick compe- tition for a solution. Yardstick competition, however, ignores quality issues. This paper fills this gap in the literature and shows that endogenizing qual- ity changes the results of yardstick competition substantially. Quality will be zero and cost reduction efforts can be heavily distorted. In general, a simpler version of yardstick competition average cost pricing turns out to be more favorable, though not perfect.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    File Function: First version, 2006
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by Bavarian Graduate Program in Economics (BGPE) in its series Working Papers with number 013.

    in new window

    Length: 36 pages
    Date of creation: Sep 2006
    Date of revision:
    Handle: RePEc:bav:wpaper:013_koehler
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bav:wpaper:013_koehler. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Rebecca Hartschen)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.