IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/avg/wpaper/en14821.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Delivering public interest goods in Africa. Stopgap measures, state reform, and commons

Author

Listed:
  • Jean-Pierre OLIVIER de SARDAN

Abstract

Given the polysemy of the concept of “commons,” we use the concept of “public interest goods,” the content of which varies according to historical situations. In Africa, different institutions (modes of governance) deliver public goods and services, each according to its own rules and practical norms: the state, development aid, associations, municipalities, chieftaincies, religious structures, sponsors, and the private sector. The poor quality of services delivered by the state, for which many nevertheless have the highest expectations, generates various forms of stopgap delivery, in particular from the associational mode of governance (which includes some commons). However voluntary organizations are most often very dependent on external aid, and their activities generally disappear when the aid ends. Any lasting reform of public services therefore involves relying on innovative actors within governmental bodies (bureaucratic mode of governance), while forging collaborations with innovative actors within the voluntary sector and municipalities in particular, but possibly with other modes of governance, with a view to reducing aid dependency.

Suggested Citation

  • Jean-Pierre OLIVIER de SARDAN, 2023. "Delivering public interest goods in Africa. Stopgap measures, state reform, and commons," Working Paper 410c72bb-5064-473e-8f7d-1, Agence française de développement.
    • Handle: RePEc:avg:wpaper:en14821
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.afd.fr/sites/afd/files/2023-05-11-19-35/Delivering-public-interest-goods-in-Africa.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stéphanie LEYRONAS & Nadège Legroux & Benjamin CORIAT & Nicolas LE GUEN & Magali TORO, 2020. "Making Food a “Common Good”: Lessons From Three Experiences to Fight Malnutrition," Working Paper 5542e73d-27af-4e5e-8679-1, Agence française de développement.
    2. Christian Borch & Martin Kornberger, 2015. "Urban Commons : Rethinking the City," Post-Print hal-02298209, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jean-Pierre Olivier de SARDAN, 2023. "Delivering public interest goods in Africa. Stopgap measures, state reform, and commons," Working Paper 43a748f5-8011-460a-b477-a, Agence française de développement.
    2. Helga Leitner & Eric Sheppard, 2018. "From Kampungs to Condos? Contested accumulations through displacement in Jakarta," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 50(2), pages 437-456, March.
    3. Å mid Hribar, Mateja & Hori, Keiko & Urbanc, Mimi & Saito, Osamu & Zorn, Matija, 2023. "Evolution and new potentials of landscape commons: Insights from Japan and Slovenia," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    4. Dulong de Rosnay, Mélanie & Stalder, Felix, 2020. "Digital commons," Internet Policy Review: Journal on Internet Regulation, Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG), Berlin, vol. 9(4), pages 1-22.
    5. Pera, Marina, 2020. "Potential benefits and challenges of the relationship between social movements and the commons in the city of Barcelona," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    6. Emmanouela Mandalaki & Marianna Fotaki, 2020. "The Bodies of the Commons: Towards a Relational Embodied Ethics of the Commons," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 166(4), pages 745-760, November.
    7. Igor Calzada, 2018. "(Smart) Citizens from Data Providers to Decision-Makers? The Case Study of Barcelona," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-25, September.
    8. Tarmo Pikner & Krista Willman & Ari Jokinen, 2020. "Urban Commoning as a Vehicle Between Government Institutions and Informality: Collective Gardening Practices in Tampere and Narva," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(4), pages 711-729, July.
    9. Matina Kapsali & Maria Karagianni, 2017. "Book review: Common Space: The City as Commons," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 54(11), pages 2674-2677, August.
    10. Herlin Chien & Keiko Hori & Osamu Saito, 2022. "Urban commons in the techno-economic paradigm shift: An information and communication technology-enabled climate-resilient solutions review," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 49(5), pages 1389-1405, June.
    11. Elisabeth Schauppenlehner-Kloyber & Marianne Penker, 2016. "Between Participation and Collective Action—From Occasional Liaisons towards Long-Term Co-Management for Urban Resilience," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-18, July.
    12. Christof Brandtner & Gordon C. C. Douglas & Martin Kornberger, 2023. "Where Relational Commons Take Place: The City and its Social Infrastructure as Sites of Commoning," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 184(4), pages 917-932, May.
    13. Jennifer Brenton & Natalie Slawinski, 2023. "Collaborating for Community Regeneration: Facilitating Partnerships in, Through, and for Place," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 184(4), pages 815-834, May.
    14. Chaitawat Boonjubun & Anne Haila & Jani Vuolteenaho, 2021. "Religious Land as Commons: Buddhist Temples, Monastic Landlordism, and the Urban Poor in Thailand," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 80(2), pages 585-636, March.
    15. Theresa Enright, 2020. "Locating the Commons in the Urban Commonwealth," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(5), pages 917-920, September.
    16. Anna Barker & Adam Crawford & Nathan Booth & David Churchill, 2020. "Park futures: Excavating images of tomorrow’s urban green spaces," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(12), pages 2456-2472, September.
    17. María José Zapata Campos & Patrik Zapata & Isabel Ordoñez, 2020. "Urban commoning practices in the repair movement: Frontstaging the backstage," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 52(6), pages 1150-1170, September.
    18. Nadine Scharf & Thomas Wachtel & Suhana E. Reddy & Ina Säumel, 2019. "Urban Commons for the Edible City—First Insights for Future Sustainable Urban Food Systems from Berlin, Germany," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-17, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Afrique;

    JEL classification:

    • Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:avg:wpaper:en14821. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AFD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/afdgvfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.