IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v57y2020i12p2456-2472.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Park futures: Excavating images of tomorrow’s urban green spaces

Author

Listed:
  • Anna Barker

    (University of Leeds, UK)

  • Adam Crawford

    (University of Leeds, UK)

  • Nathan Booth

    (Independent researcher, UK)

  • David Churchill

    (University of Leeds, UK)

Abstract

British urban parks are a creation of the 19th century and a central feature in the Victorian image of the city. In the UK, parks are at a critical juncture as to their future role, prospects and sustainability. This article contributes to renewed interest in ‘social futures’ by thinking forward through the past about the trajectory of Victorian public parks. We outline six images of what parks might become, derived from traces in history and extrapolations from current trends. These projections diverge in terms of adaptations to funding and governance, management of competing demands and organisation of use. In contrast to a dominant Victorian park ideal and its relative continuity over time, we are likely to see the intensification of increasingly varied park futures. We draw attention to interaction effects between these differing images of the future. Excavated from the Victorian legacy, the park futures presented have wider potential inferences and resonance, including beyond the UK. By mapping divergent visions for parks, we call for a public debate about how parks might be re-imagined in ways that draw upon their rich heritage and highlight the pivotal role of civil society actors in shaping future pathways between possible, probable and preferable futures.

Suggested Citation

  • Anna Barker & Adam Crawford & Nathan Booth & David Churchill, 2020. "Park futures: Excavating images of tomorrow’s urban green spaces," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(12), pages 2456-2472, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:57:y:2020:i:12:p:2456-2472
    DOI: 10.1177/0042098019875405
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0042098019875405
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0042098019875405?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christian Borch & Martin Kornberger, 2015. "Urban Commons : Rethinking the City," Post-Print hal-02298209, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ian Mell & John Sturzaker & Alice Correia & Mary Gearey & Neale Blair & Luciana Lang & Fearghus O’Sullivan, 2022. "When Is a Park More Than a Park? Rethinking the Role of Parks as “Shared Space” in Post-Conflict Belfast," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-20, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Helga Leitner & Eric Sheppard, 2018. "From Kampungs to Condos? Contested accumulations through displacement in Jakarta," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 50(2), pages 437-456, March.
    2. Dulong de Rosnay, Mélanie & Stalder, Felix, 2020. "Digital commons," Internet Policy Review: Journal on Internet Regulation, Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG), Berlin, vol. 9(4), pages 1-22.
    3. Pera, Marina, 2020. "Potential benefits and challenges of the relationship between social movements and the commons in the city of Barcelona," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    4. Emmanouela Mandalaki & Marianna Fotaki, 2020. "The Bodies of the Commons: Towards a Relational Embodied Ethics of the Commons," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 166(4), pages 745-760, November.
    5. Elisabeth Schauppenlehner-Kloyber & Marianne Penker, 2016. "Between Participation and Collective Action—From Occasional Liaisons towards Long-Term Co-Management for Urban Resilience," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-18, July.
    6. Jennifer Brenton & Natalie Slawinski, 2023. "Collaborating for Community Regeneration: Facilitating Partnerships in, Through, and for Place," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 184(4), pages 815-834, May.
    7. Chaitawat Boonjubun & Anne Haila & Jani Vuolteenaho, 2021. "Religious Land as Commons: Buddhist Temples, Monastic Landlordism, and the Urban Poor in Thailand," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 80(2), pages 585-636, March.
    8. Theresa Enright, 2020. "Locating the Commons in the Urban Commonwealth," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(5), pages 917-920, September.
    9. Nadine Scharf & Thomas Wachtel & Suhana E. Reddy & Ina Säumel, 2019. "Urban Commons for the Edible City—First Insights for Future Sustainable Urban Food Systems from Berlin, Germany," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-17, February.
    10. Å mid Hribar, Mateja & Hori, Keiko & Urbanc, Mimi & Saito, Osamu & Zorn, Matija, 2023. "Evolution and new potentials of landscape commons: Insights from Japan and Slovenia," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    11. Jean-Pierre Olivier de SARDAN, 2023. "Delivering public interest goods in Africa. Stopgap measures, state reform, and commons," Working Paper 43a748f5-8011-460a-b477-a, Agence française de développement.
    12. Igor Calzada, 2018. "(Smart) Citizens from Data Providers to Decision-Makers? The Case Study of Barcelona," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-25, September.
    13. Jean-Pierre OLIVIER de SARDAN, 2023. "Delivering public interest goods in Africa. Stopgap measures, state reform, and commons," Working Paper 410c72bb-5064-473e-8f7d-1, Agence française de développement.
    14. Tarmo Pikner & Krista Willman & Ari Jokinen, 2020. "Urban Commoning as a Vehicle Between Government Institutions and Informality: Collective Gardening Practices in Tampere and Narva," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(4), pages 711-729, July.
    15. Matina Kapsali & Maria Karagianni, 2017. "Book review: Common Space: The City as Commons," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 54(11), pages 2674-2677, August.
    16. Herlin Chien & Keiko Hori & Osamu Saito, 2022. "Urban commons in the techno-economic paradigm shift: An information and communication technology-enabled climate-resilient solutions review," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 49(5), pages 1389-1405, June.
    17. Christof Brandtner & Gordon C. C. Douglas & Martin Kornberger, 2023. "Where Relational Commons Take Place: The City and its Social Infrastructure as Sites of Commoning," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 184(4), pages 917-932, May.
    18. María José Zapata Campos & Patrik Zapata & Isabel Ordoñez, 2020. "Urban commoning practices in the repair movement: Frontstaging the backstage," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 52(6), pages 1150-1170, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:57:y:2020:i:12:p:2456-2472. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.