IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arz/wpaper/eres2012_173.html

Determining indicators of quality of life differences in European cities

Author

Listed:
  • Wolfgang Breuer
  • Dominique Schaeling

Abstract

The comparison of cities by indicators covering several topics of urban life is crucial for policy decisions such as funding allocation for urban development. Simply adding up a high number of indicators to one single index evokes reasonable criticism due to opacity and very limited interpretation possibilities. Nevertheless, the same arguments can be made against using large sets of disaggregated indicators for city comparison. This paper helps to steer a middle course by identifying of a small number of relevant indicators to determine quality of life differences. The basis of this analysis is the Urban Audit Key Indicator Set which is provided by the Eurostat database and consists of 46 indicators covering different aspects of urban life. Principal Component Analysis reveals a small number of indicators which have a high impact on the overall differences between the selected cities of each of the ten countries and five time frames that were analysed. This study extends the general application of Principal Component Analysis for regional clustering by the combination of 244 partial analyses to identify determining indicators of urban differences. The results show that a small set of indicators, which are often among the most relevant determinants, can be identified. Those selected indicators are spread over the initial groups representing environmental, human, manufactured and social urban capital as well as demographic aspects. They cover current political debates on environmental, infrastructural and migration difficulties in cities, safety and especially security impairment due to anonymity and poverty in densely populated areas as well as population changes leading to space shortage in larger cities but also abandonment in small cities. Applying this method to wider data sets seems promising as it might lead to important insights which could impact policy measures on urban development and its funding allocation processes.

Suggested Citation

  • Wolfgang Breuer & Dominique Schaeling, 2012. "Determining indicators of quality of life differences in European cities," ERES eres2012_173, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
    • Handle: RePEc:arz:wpaper:eres2012_173
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eres.architexturez.net/doc/oai-eres-id-eres2012-173
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://eres.architexturez.net/system/files/pdf/eres2012_173.content.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nijkamp, Peter, 1986. "Infrastructure and Regional Development: A Multidimensional Policy Analysis," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 1-21.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Massimiliano Serati & Fausto Pacicco, 2018. "A proposal for a micro-territorial well-being index: the WIT," RIEDS - Rivista Italiana di Economia, Demografia e Statistica - The Italian Journal of Economic, Demographic and Statistical Studies, SIEDS Societa' Italiana di Economia Demografia e Statistica, vol. 72(3), pages 77-99, July-Sept.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tira, Maurizio & Tiboni, Michela & Badiani, Barbara, 2002. "High speed/high capacity railway and regional development - evaluation of effects on spatial accessibility," ERSA conference papers ersa02p362, European Regional Science Association.
    2. William F. Fox & Sanela Porca, 2001. "Investing in Rural Infrastructure," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 24(1), pages 103-133, January.
    3. Dorota Mi³ek, 2022. "Disparities in the level of regional technical infrastructure development in Poland: multicriteria analysis," Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 17(4), pages 1087-1113, December.
    4. Nijkamp, P. & Alsters, T. & Mark, R. van der, 1986. "Revitalization of regional resources : a multidimensional profile analysis," Serie Research Memoranda 0043, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    5. Nikos Benos & Nikolaos Mylonidis & Stefania Zotou, 2017. "Estimating production functions for the US states: the role of public and human capital," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 52(2), pages 691-721, March.
    6. Terance J. Rephann, 1993. "Highway Investment and Regional Economic Development: Decision Methods and Empirical Foundations," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 30(2), pages 437-450, March.
    7. Zhiyuan An & Enqiu He & Xue Du & Bo Sun, 2024. "Path analysis of regional logistics and economy coordinated development: An fsQCA approach," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(2), pages 1-27, February.
    8. Elburz, Zeynep & Nijkamp, Peter & Pels, Eric, 2017. "Public infrastructure and regional growth: Lessons from meta-analysis," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 1-8.
    9. Zewdie Habte Shikur, 2022. "Logistics Performance, Export, Agricultural, Manufacturing, and Aggregate Economic Growth: A Focus on Sectoral Perspectives," Journal of Economic Development, The Economic Research Institute, Chung-Ang University, vol. 47(3), pages 107-123.
    10. Cecilia Wong, 2002. "Developing Indicators to Inform Local Economic Development in England," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 39(10), pages 1833-1863, September.
    11. repec:dgr:rugsom:95d30 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Trofimov, Ivan D., 2020. "Public capital and productive economy profits: evidence from OECD economies," MPRA Paper 106848, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Song, Lili & van Geenhuizen, Marina, 2014. "Port infrastructure investment and regional economic growth in China: Panel evidence in port regions and provinces," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 173-183.
    14. Sturm, Jan-egbert & Jacobs, Jan & Groote, Peter, 1999. "Output Effects of Infrastructure Investment in the Netherlands, 1853-1913," Journal of Macroeconomics, Elsevier, vol. 21(2), pages 355-380, April.
    15. Masárová Jana & Ivanová Eva, 2016. "Road infrastructure in the regions of the Slovak Republic and Poland," Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series, Sciendo, vol. 33(33), pages 79-90, September.
    16. Hemert, P. van & Nijkamp, P., 2008. "Thematic research prioritization in the EU and the Netherlands: an assessment on the basis of content analysis," Serie Research Memoranda 0023, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    17. Loretta Singletary & Mark Henry & Kerry Brooks & James London, 1995. "The Impact Of Highway Investment On New Manufacturing Employment In South Carolina: A Small Region Spatial Analysis," The Review of Regional Studies, Southern Regional Science Association, vol. 25(1), pages 37-55, Summer.
    18. Gheorghe Savoiu & Sebastian Parlac & Constantin Manea, 2015. "A Multidimensional Statistical Analysis of a Set of Ten Academic Programs," Romanian Statistical Review Supplement, Romanian Statistical Review, vol. 63(9), pages 61-72, September.
    19. Sturm, Jan-Egbert & Jacobs, Jan & Groote, Peter, 1995. "Productivity impacts of infrastructure investment in the Netherlands 1853-1913," Research Report 95D30, University of Groningen, Research Institute SOM (Systems, Organisations and Management).
    20. Nijkamp, P. & Poot, J., 1990. "Endogenous technological progress and spatial interdependence," Serie Research Memoranda 0061, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    21. Celbis, Mehmet Güney & Nijkamp, Peter & Poot, Jacques, 2013. "How big is the impact of infrastructure on trade? Evidence from meta-analysis," MERIT Working Papers 2013-032, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R3 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Real Estate Markets, Spatial Production Analysis, and Firm Location

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arz:wpaper:eres2012_173. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Architexturez Imprints (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eressea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.