Cities of Signals: Compression, Separation, and the Geometry of Novelty

A cross-sectional signal is a forecast vector over $d$ assets at each date; demeaned and normalized, it is a point on a sphere. Its city is the direction of its time-averaged vector in a common target-aligned frame, a compressed summary. When is the angle between two cities a conservative estimate of the angle between the histories? For independent uniform histories, the probability that the history angle is at least the city angle tends to one when the city angle is at most 90 degrees, with an $O(T^{-1/2})$ error bound uniform in dimension. Selecting for positive average information coefficient (IC) changes the unconditional limit to $\gamma_q>1/2$, about 56% for 20 assets. The bound extends to independent, rotationally symmetric histories with temporal dependence; summable products of lag correlations preserve the conditional limit. A stationary ergodic theorem allows shared signal movement and identifies the population margin determining the limiting ordering. Among 266,815 positive-IC pairs in AlphaNova's Competition May 2026, the history angle is at least the city angle for 58.9% overall, 74.1% at city angles up to 90 degrees, and 1.5% beyond. These frequencies describe the observed library and do not validate the uniform null: residual agreement is mostly positive, and an empirical second-moment diagnostic cannot be matched within that null by adjusting temporal dependence alone. On the full 776-signal sample, a city angle of at least 60 degrees selects pairs with a 94.3% success rate at the same history-angle threshold, against an 85.0% base rate, and retains 72.5% of pairs. Explicit constructions show the limits of direction-only summaries, retained lengths give sharp bounds, and shared time blocks recover missing information, here only at fine resolution. Persistent positive IC confines cities and bounds their motion; convergence also requires a stable mean direction.