IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2609.15741.html

Quantifying the 2027 Solvency II Risk Margin Reform

Author

Listed:
  • Said Khalil

    (TREE, INSEA)

  • Fatima Zahrae Chaayra

    (INSEA)

Abstract

The 2027 Solvency II reform recalibrates the Risk Margin by reducing the prescribed cost-of-capital rate from 6% to 4.75% and introducing a time-dependent attenuation of future Solvency Capital Requirements. This paper develops an analytical and numerical framework for characterizing the effect of the final regulatory calibration. By normalizing discounted projected capital requirements into a probability distribution over run-off time, we obtain an exact representation of the ratio between the revised and previous Risk Margins. The framework yields sharp universal and horizon-specific bounds, characterizes the effect of later capital timing through stochastic dominance, and shows that mean run-off time alone does not determine the reform effect when temporal dispersion varies. Additional bounds are derived conditional on mean run-off time and horizon. Conditional on a given projected SCR path, the mechanical reduction lies between 20.83% and 60.42%. For proportional Best Estimate projections, an exact covariance decomposition identifies how departures from proportionality affect the relative reform ratio. Holding the projected SCR path fixed, the revised formula has a lower direct interest-rate semi-elasticity than the previous calibration. A reduced-form stochastic extension further quantifies convexity effects arising from uncertainty in capital persistence. Numerical applications reconstruct Risk Margin calculations from published actuarial run-off profiles and complement them with controlled long-horizon, interest-rate, and persistence experiments. The results show that the reform effect is governed by the temporal structure of future capital and provide tractable tools for assessing projected capital profiles, Risk Margin simplifications, and direct discount-rate sensitivity.

Suggested Citation

  • Said Khalil & Fatima Zahrae Chaayra, 2026. "Quantifying the 2027 Solvency II Risk Margin Reform," Papers 2609.15741, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2609.15741
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2609.15741
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Barigou, Karim & Chen, Ze & Dhaene, Jan, 2019. "Fair dynamic valuation of insurance liabilities: Merging actuarial judgement with market- and time-consistency," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 19-29.
    2. Dreksler, S. & Allen, C. & Akoh-Arrey, A. & Courchene, J. A. & Junaid, B. & Kirk, J. & Lowe, W. & O’Dea, S. & Piper, J. & Shah, M. & Shaw, G. & Storman, D. & Thaper, S. & Thomas, L. & Wheatley, M. & W, 2015. "Solvency Ii Technical Provisions For General Insurers," British Actuarial Journal, Cambridge University Press, vol. 20(1), pages 7-129, March.
    3. repec:cup:bracjl:v:29:y:2024:i::p:-_7 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Antoon Pelsser & Mitja Stadje, 2014. "Time-Consistent And Market-Consistent Evaluations," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(1), pages 25-65, January.
    5. Christiansen, Marcus C. & Niemeyer, Andreas, 2014. "Fundamental Definition Of The Solvency Capital Requirement In Solvency Ii," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 44(3), pages 501-533, September.
    6. Tsanakas, Andreas & Wüthrich, Mario V. & Černý, Aleš, 2013. "Market Value Margin Via Mean–Variance Hedging," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 43(3), pages 301-322, September.
    7. Ohlsson, Esbjörn & Lauzeningks, Jan, 2009. "The one-year non-life insurance risk," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(2), pages 203-208, October.
    8. Mario Wüthrich & Michael Merz & Natalia Lysenko, 2009. "Uncertainty of the claims development result in the chain ladder method," Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2009(1), pages 63-84.
    9. Dhaene, Jan & Stassen, Ben & Barigou, Karim & Linders, Daniël & Chen, Ze, 2017. "Fair valuation of insurance liabilities: Merging actuarial judgement and market-consistency," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 14-27.
    10. Engsner, Hampus & Lindholm, Mathias & Lindskog, Filip, 2017. "Insurance valuation: A computable multi-period cost-of-capital approach," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 250-264.
    11. Diers, Dorothea & Linde, Marc, 2013. "The multi-year non-life insurance risk in the additive loss reserving model," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(3), pages 590-598.
    12. England, P.D. & Verrall, R.J. & Wüthrich, M.V., 2019. "On the lifetime and one-year views of reserve risk, with application to IFRS 17 and Solvency II risk margins," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 74-88.
    13. Hansjörg Albrecher & Karl‐Theodor Eisele & Mogens Steffensen & Mario V. Wüthrich, 2022. "On the cost‐of‐capital rate under incomplete market valuation," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 89(4), pages 1139-1158, December.
    14. C. C. Huang & W. T. Ziemba & A. Ben-Tal, 1977. "Bounds on the Expectation of a Convex Function of a Random Variable: With Applications to Stochastic Programming," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 25(2), pages 315-325, April.
    15. Bauer, Daniel & Reuss, Andreas & Singer, Daniela, 2012. "On the Calculation of the Solvency Capital Requirement Based on Nested Simulations," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 42(2), pages 453-499, November.
    16. Barigou, Karim & Bignozzi, Valeria & Tsanakas, Andreas, 2022. "Insurance Valuation: A Two-Step Generalised Regression Approach," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 52(1), pages 211-245, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hansjorg Albrecher & Filip Lindskog & Herv'e Zumbach, 2025. "Cost-of-capital valuation with risky assets," Papers 2511.00895, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2026.
    2. Engsner, Hampus & Lindskog, Filip & Thøgersen, Julie, 2023. "Multiple-prior valuation of cash flows subject to capital requirements," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 41-56.
    3. Chen, Ze & Chen, Bingzheng & Dhaene, Jan & Yang, Tianyu, 2021. "Fair dynamic valuation of insurance liabilities via convex hedging," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 1-13.
    4. Chen, Ze & Feng, Runhuan & Li, Hong & Yang, Tianyu, 2024. "Coping with longevity via hedging: Fair dynamic valuation of variable annuities," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 154-169.
    5. Belhouari, Oussama & Devolder, Pierre & Linders, Daniel, 2025. "The Three-step method in a dynamic setting," LIDAM Discussion Papers ISBA 2025018, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).
    6. Gian Paolo Clemente & Francesco Della Corte & Nino Savelli, 2021. "A bridge between Local GAAP and Solvency II frameworks to quantify Capital Requirement for demographic risk," Papers 2107.10891, arXiv.org.
    7. Pauline Milaure Ngugnie Diffouo & Pierre Devolder, 2020. "Longevity Risk Measurement of Life Annuity Products," Risks, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-16, March.
    8. Gian Paolo Clemente & Francesco Della Corte & Nino Savelli, 2021. "A Bridge between Local GAAP and Solvency II Frameworks to Quantify Capital Requirement for Demographic Risk," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-19, September.
    9. Hampus Engsner & Kristoffer Lindensjö & Filip Lindskog, 2020. "The value of a liability cash flow in discrete time subject to capital requirements," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 125-167, January.
    10. Karim Barigou & Daniel Linders & Fan Yang, 2021. "Actuarial-consistency and two-step actuarial valuations: a new paradigm to insurance valuation," Papers 2109.13796, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2022.
    11. Hampus Engsner, 2021. "Least Squares Monte Carlo applied to Dynamic Monetary Utility Functions," Papers 2101.10947, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2021.
    12. Tahir Choulli & Catherine Daveloose & Michèle Vanmaele, 2021. "Mortality/Longevity Risk-Minimization with or without Securitization," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(14), pages 1-27, July.
    13. Engler, Nils & Lindskog, Filip, 2025. "Approximations of multi-period liability values by simple formulas," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    14. Karim Barigou & Lukasz Delong, 2021. "Pricing equity-linked life insurance contracts with multiple risk factors by neural networks," Working Papers hal-02896141, HAL.
    15. Bauer, Daniel & Zanjani, George, 2021. "Economic capital and RAROC in a dynamic model," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    16. Karim Barigou & Lukasz Delong, 2020. "Pricing equity-linked life insurance contracts with multiple risk factors by neural networks," Papers 2007.08804, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2021.
    17. Hampus Engsner & Filip Lindskog & Julie Thoegersen, 2021. "Multiple-prior valuation of cash flows subject to capital requirements," Papers 2109.00306, arXiv.org.
    18. Karim Barigou & Valeria Bignozzi & Andreas Tsanakas, 2021. "Insurance valuation: A two-step generalised regression approach," Post-Print hal-03043244, HAL.
    19. Koch-Medina, Pablo & Moreno-Bromberg, Santiago & Ravanelli, Claudia & Šikić, Mario, 2021. "Revisiting optimal investment strategies of value-maximizing insurance firms," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 131-151.
    20. van Bilsen, Servaas & Linders, Daniël, 2019. "Affordable and adequate annuities with stable payouts: Fantasy or reality?," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 19-42.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2609.15741. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.