IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2608.18443.html

Limit Theory for U-Statistics under Clustered and Weakly Dependent Data

Author

Listed:
  • Emmanuel Selorm Tsyawo

Abstract

This paper develops asymptotic theory and feasible inference for unbounded-kernel order-k U-statistics under clustered sampling and weakly dependent time-series. The analysis first builds the complete order-2 pipeline, moving from clustered data to exact $m$-dependence and then to near-epoch dependence. The same logic is subsequently extended to general order k greater or equal to 2. Under clustered sampling, the theory allows arbitrary within-cluster dependence and growing, unbalanced cluster sizes. Under weak dependence, an i.i.d.-based approximating sequence carries the exact-m theory to near-epoch-dependent processes. The common combinatorial device partitions the sample into columns, separating sampling-generic tuples, where the first-order Hoeffding projection is analysed, from collision terms and higher-order Hoeffding projection remainders, which are controlled explicitly. Cluster-robust and HAC estimators of the covariance of the first-order projection, needed for feasible inference, are shown to be consistent. Empirical applications and data-calibrated simulations for inequality, L-moment, and rank-dependence statistics illustrate the finite-sample performance of the proposed procedures.

Suggested Citation

  • Emmanuel Selorm Tsyawo, 2026. "Limit Theory for U-Statistics under Clustered and Weakly Dependent Data," Papers 2608.18443, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2026.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2608.18443
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2608.18443
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dehling, Herold & Vogel, Daniel & Wendler, Martin & Wied, Dominik, 2017. "Testing For Changes In Kendall’S Tau," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 33(6), pages 1352-1386, December.
    2. Davidson, James, 1994. "Stochastic Limit Theory: An Introduction for Econometricians," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780198774037.
    3. Robert M. De Jong & James Davidson, 2000. "Consistency of Kernel Estimators of Heteroscedastic and Autocorrelated Covariance Matrices," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 68(2), pages 407-424, March.
    4. Hansen, Bruce E. & Lee, Seojeong, 2019. "Asymptotic theory for clustered samples," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 210(2), pages 268-290.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Paulo M. D. C. Parente & Richard J. Smith, 2021. "Quasi‐maximum likelihood and the kernel block bootstrap for nonlinear dynamic models," Journal of Time Series Analysis, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(4), pages 377-405, July.
    2. Zacharias Psaradakis & Marián Vávra, 2022. "Using Triples to Assess Symmetry Under Weak Dependence," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(4), pages 1538-1551, October.
    3. J. Isaac Miller, 2010. "Cointegrating regressions with messy regressors and an application to mixed‐frequency series," Journal of Time Series Analysis, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 255-277, July.
    4. Koo, Bonsoo & Seo, Myung Hwan, 2015. "Structural-break models under mis-specification: Implications for forecasting," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 188(1), pages 166-181.
    5. Yannick Hoga, 2022. "Quantifying the data-dredging bias in structural break tests," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 63(1), pages 143-155, February.
    6. Li, Jia & Liao, Zhipeng, 2020. "Uniform nonparametric inference for time series," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 219(1), pages 38-51.
    7. Kourogenis, Nikolaos & Pittis, Nikitas & Samartzis, Panagiotis, 2024. "Unbounded heteroscedasticity in autoregressive models," The Journal of Economic Asymmetries, Elsevier, vol. 29(C).
    8. Lea Wegner & Martin Wendler, 2024. "Robust change-point detection for functional time series based on U-statistics and dependent wild bootstrap," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 65(7), pages 4767-4810, September.
    9. J. Isaac Miller, 2007. "Cointegrating Regressions with Messy Regressors: Missingness, Mixed Frequency, and Measurement Error," Working Papers 0722, Department of Economics, University of Missouri, revised 15 Apr 2009.
    10. Cheol-Keun Cho & Timothy J. Vogelsang, 2016. "Fixed- b Inference for Testing Structural Change in a Time Series Regression," Econometrics, MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-26, December.
    11. Yannick Hoga & Christian Schulz, 2025. "Self-Normalized Inference in (Quantile, Expected Shortfall) Regressions for Time Series," Papers 2502.10065, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2025.
    12. Ghysels, Eric & Hill, Jonathan B. & Motegi, Kaiji, 2016. "Testing for Granger causality with mixed frequency data," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 192(1), pages 207-230.
    13. Miller J. Isaac, 2010. "A Nonlinear IV Likelihood-Based Rank Test for Multivariate Time Series and Long Panels," Journal of Time Series Econometrics, De Gruyter, vol. 2(1), pages 1-38, September.
    14. Davidson, James, 2020. "A new consistency proof for HAC variance estimators," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    15. Tobias Fissler & Yannick Hoga, 2021. "Backtesting Systemic Risk Forecasts using Multi-Objective Elicitability," Papers 2104.10673, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2022.
    16. Giuseppe Cavaliere & Dimitris N. Politis & Anders Rahbek & Antoine Djogbenou & Sílvia Gonçalves & Benoit Perron, 2015. "Recent developments in bootstrap methods for dependent data," Journal of Time Series Analysis, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(3), pages 481-502, May.
    17. Calhoun, Gray, 2014. "Out-Of-Sample Comparisons of Overfit Models," Staff General Research Papers Archive 32462, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    18. Li, Jia & Liao, Zhipeng & Zhou, Wenyu, 2025. "A general test for functional inequalities," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 251(C).
    19. Alberto Abadie & Susan Athey & Guido W. Imbens & Jeffrey M. Wooldridge, 2020. "Sampling‐Based versus Design‐Based Uncertainty in Regression Analysis," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 88(1), pages 265-296, January.
    20. Pierre Perron & Yohei Yamamoto, 2022. "Structural change tests under heteroskedasticity: Joint estimation versus two‐steps methods," Journal of Time Series Analysis, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(3), pages 389-411, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2608.18443. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.