IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2608.06842.html

Tabular Foundation Models and the Unity of Economic Behaviour

Author

Listed:
  • Victor H. Aguiar

Abstract

Economics uses different behavioural models for risk, time, losses, valuation, and social choice. I study a unified choice experiment in which the same decision makers face all these domains. I hide a decision maker's choices in one domain and ask a frozen tabular foundation model to recover them from that decision maker's choices elsewhere and labelled choices by other participants. The foundation model improves on the training-sample median, and the gain disappears when visible choices are shuffled across decision makers. I then estimate one random-utility model over the foundation model's learned representation. This structural model applies the same utility function in every domain, retains most of the foundation model's reduction in prediction error, predicts domains excluded from utility estimation, and reproduces how behavioural measures co-move across people. The resulting model separates three objects: a learned common choice domain, one systematic utility function on that domain, and one random component that generates stochastic choice on observed menus.

Suggested Citation

  • Victor H. Aguiar, 2026. "Tabular Foundation Models and the Unity of Economic Behaviour," Papers 2608.06842, arXiv.org.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2608.06842
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2608.06842
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Valentino Dardanoni & Paola Manzini & Marco Mariotti & Christopher J. Tyson, 2020. "Inferring Cognitive Heterogeneity From Aggregate Choices," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 88(3), pages 1269-1296, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Azrieli, Yaron & Rehbeck, John N., 0. "Marginal stochastic choice," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society.
    2. Kovach, Matthew & Suleymanov, Elchin, 2023. "Reference dependence and random attention," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 215(C), pages 421-441.
    3. Kashaev, Nail & Aguiar, Victor H., 2022. "A random attention and utility model," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    4. Wilfried Youmbi, 2024. "Nonparametric Analysis of Random Utility Models Robust to Nontransitive Preferences," Papers 2406.13969, arXiv.org.
    5. Daniele Caliari & Henrik Petri, 2024. "Irrational Random Utility Models," Papers 2403.10208, arXiv.org, revised May 2025.
    6. Kai Wang, 2026. "Random Utility Model with Endogenously Assigned Menus," Papers 2607.08218, arXiv.org.
    7. Wang, Kai, 2022. "Approval with frames," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    8. Levon Barseghyan & Francesca Molinari & Matthew Thirkettle, 2021. "Discrete Choice under Risk with Limited Consideration," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 111(6), pages 1972-2006, June.
    9. Cristina Gualdani & Shruti Sinha, 2019. "Identification in discrete choice models with imperfect information," Papers 1911.04529, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2023.
    10. Larry G Epstein & Kaushil Patel, 2024. "Identifying Heterogeneous Decision Rules From Choices When Menus Are Unobserved," Papers 2405.09500, arXiv.org.
    11. Levon Barseghyan & Maura Coughlin & Francesca Molinari & Joshua C. Teitelbaum, 2021. "Heterogeneous Choice Sets and Preferences," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 89(5), pages 2015-2048, September.
    12. Christopher Kops & Paola Manzini & Marco Mariotti & Illia Pasichnichenko, 2026. "Identifying Behavioral Types," Papers 2602.10756, arXiv.org.
    13. Gualdani, Cristina & Sinha, Shruti, 2019. "Identification and inference in discrete choice models with imperfect information," TSE Working Papers 19-1049, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE), revised Jun 2020.
    14. Kops, Christopher, 2022. "Cluster-shortlisted choice," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    15. Gualdani, Cristina & Sinha, Shruti, 2024. "Identification in discrete choice models with imperfect information," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 244(1).
    16. Chambers, Christopher P. & Turansick, Christopher, 2025. "The limits of identification in discrete choice," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 537-551.
    17. Francesco Cerigioni, 2021. "Dual Decision Processes: Retrieving Preferences When Some Choices Are Automatic," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 129(6), pages 1667-1704.
    18. Jose Apesteguia & Miguel A. Ballester & Ángelo Gutiérrez-Daza, 2024. "Random Discounted Expected Utility," Working Papers 2024-03, Banco de México.
    19. Masatlioglu, Yusufcan & Vu, Tri Phu, 2024. "Growing attention," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    20. Mikhail Freer & Hassan Nosratabadi, 2024. "On the Welfare (Ir)Relevance of Two-Stage Models," Papers 2411.08263, arXiv.org.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2608.06842. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.