IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2606.15715.html

Trading in the Sunshine or in the Shade: Market Impact and Adverse Selection on Hyperliquid

Author

Listed:
  • Davide Barone
  • Fabrizio Lillo

Abstract

Sunshine trading theory predicts that publicly disclosing trading intentions can reduce adverse selection and attract liquidity provision, lowering execution costs. Evidence is scarce, because explicit preannouncement of large orders is rare in traditional markets. We study Hyperliquid, a fully on-chain limit order book for cryptocurrency perpetual futures, where protocol-native TWAP orders disclose their terms from inception and remain visible while active, a natural form of sunshine trading. Using address-level data, we reconstruct 4.3 million hidden metaorders and compare them with 465,000 visible TWAP executions. The two execution styles differ sharply: hidden metaorders follow front-loaded, U-shaped schedules consistent with transient-impact optimal execution, whereas TWAPs trade nearly uniformly. We test the preannouncement predictions of Admati and Pfleiderer (1991). Visible TWAPs face lower execution costs than comparable hidden metaorders and leave a smaller permanent price impact. Hidden metaorders executed alongside already-visible same-direction TWAP flow incur higher permanent costs: adverse-selection costs shift toward non-announcers. Finally, visible TWAP programs elicit liquidity provision: while active, displayed depth rises and the book tilts toward the absorbing side, the more so the larger the announced order.

Suggested Citation

  • Davide Barone & Fabrizio Lillo, 2026. "Trading in the Sunshine or in the Shade: Market Impact and Adverse Selection on Hyperliquid," Papers 2606.15715, arXiv.org.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2606.15715
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2606.15715
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bence Toth & Zoltan Eisler & Jean-Philippe Bouchaud, 2016. "The square-root impact law also holds for option markets," Papers 1602.03043, arXiv.org.
    2. Bence Toth & Yves Lemperiere & Cyril Deremble & Joachim de Lataillade & Julien Kockelkoren & Jean-Philippe Bouchaud, 2011. "Anomalous price impact and the critical nature of liquidity in financial markets," Papers 1105.1694, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2011.
    3. J. Donier & J. Bonart & I. Mastromatteo & J.-P. Bouchaud, 2015. "A fully consistent, minimal model for non-linear market impact," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(7), pages 1109-1121, July.
    4. Jonathan Donier & Julius Bonart & Iacopo Mastromatteo & Jean-Philippe Bouchaud, 2014. "A fully consistent, minimal model for non-linear market impact," Papers 1412.0141, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2015.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fr'ed'eric Bucci & Iacopo Mastromatteo & Michael Benzaquen & Jean-Philippe Bouchaud, 2019. "Impact is not just volatility," Papers 1905.04569, arXiv.org.
    2. Emilio Said, 2022. "Market Impact: Empirical Evidence, Theory and Practice," Working Papers hal-03668669, HAL.
    3. Frédéric Bucci & Iacopo Mastromatteo & Michael Benzaquen & Jean-Philippe Bouchaud, 2019. "Impact is not just volatility," Post-Print hal-02323182, HAL.
    4. Zoltan Eisler & Jean-Philippe Bouchaud, 2016. "Price impact without order book: A study of the OTC credit index market," Papers 1609.04620, arXiv.org.
    5. Fabrizio Lillo, 2021. "Order flow and price formation," Papers 2105.00521, arXiv.org.
    6. Emilio Said, 2022. "Market Impact: Empirical Evidence, Theory and Practice," Papers 2205.07385, arXiv.org.
    7. Fr'ed'eric Bucci & Michael Benzaquen & Fabrizio Lillo & Jean-Philippe Bouchaud, 2019. "Slow decay of impact in equity markets: insights from the ANcerno database," Papers 1901.05332, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2019.
    8. Frédéric Bucci & Michael Benzaquen & Fabrizio Lillo & Jean-Philippe Bouchaud, 2019. "Slow Decay of Impact in Equity Markets: Insights from the ANcerno Database," Post-Print hal-02323357, HAL.
    9. Mohammed Salek & Damien Challet & Ioane Muni Toke, 2024. "Equity auction dynamics: latent liquidity models with activity acceleration," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(10), pages 1381-1398, October.
    10. Olivier Guéant, 2016. "The Financial Mathematics of Market Liquidity: From Optimal Execution to Market Making," Post-Print hal-01393136, HAL.
    11. Seungki Min & Costis Maglaras & Ciamac C. Moallemi, 2022. "Cross-Sectional Variation of Intraday Liquidity, Cross-Impact, and Their Effect on Portfolio Execution," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 70(2), pages 830-846, March.
    12. Natascha Hey & Iacopo Mastromatteo & Johannes Muhle-Karbe & Kevin Webster, 2025. "Trading with Concave Price Impact and Impact Decay—Theory and Evidence," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 73(3), pages 1230-1247, May.
    13. Chris Angstmann & Tim Gebbie, 2026. "Revisiting Trade-sign Long-memory and Square-root Law price impact," Papers 2606.16269, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2026.
    14. Jean-Philippe Bouchaud, 2021. "The Inelastic Market Hypothesis: A Microstructural Interpretation," Papers 2108.00242, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2022.
    15. Mathias Pohl & Alexander Ristig & Walter Schachermayer & Ludovic Tangpi, 2017. "The amazing power of dimensional analysis: Quantifying market impact," Papers 1702.05434, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2017.
    16. Brunovský, Pavol & Černý, Aleš & Komadel, Ján, 2018. "Optimal trade execution under endogenous pressure to liquidate: Theory and numerical solutions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 264(3), pages 1159-1171.
    17. Damian Eduardo Taranto & Giacomo Bormetti & Jean-Philippe Bouchaud & Fabrizio Lillo & Bence Toth, 2016. "Linear models for the impact of order flow on prices II. The Mixture Transition Distribution model," Papers 1604.07556, arXiv.org.
    18. Sergey Nadtochiy, 2020. "A simple microstructural explanation of the concavity of price impact," Papers 2001.01860, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2020.
    19. Adele Ravagnani & Fabrizio Lillo, 2025. "Modeling metaorder impact with a Non-Markovian Zero Intelligence model," Papers 2503.05254, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2025.
    20. Sergey Nadtochiy, 2022. "A simple microstructural explanation of the concavity of price impact," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(1), pages 78-113, January.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2606.15715. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.