IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2605.23979.html

Faster Forward Sensitivities: Reduced stochastic hedge ratios from pathwise algorithmic differentiation

Author

Listed:
  • Christian P Fries

Abstract

Monte-Carlo valuation engines can generate pathwise sensitivities of a derivative value with respect to a high-dimensional vector of model primitives. Hedge ratios with respect to market instruments are then linked to these primitive sensitivities by a pathwise linear relation. Solving this relation independently on every simulated path may be expensive, unstable, and unnecessarily high-dimensional. This paper studies reduced stochastic hedge ratios of the form $\phi_j^r=\sum_{q=1}^r\xi_j^qX_q$, where the number of solution basis functions is much smaller than the number of Monte-Carlo paths. The hedge-instrument sensitivity tensor is not replaced by its own basis expansion; it is retained through empirical averages over the simulated paths. The basis ansatz alone does not determine the coefficients, so two coefficient criteria are distinguished. The first minimizes the full empirical pathwise residual $\sum_\ell\|A_\ell\phi_\ell^r-b_\ell\|_2^2$. The second is a projected moment equation requiring $\langle A\phi^r-b,Y_s\rangle_N=0$ for selected test functions. The special case $Y_s=X_s$ is the usual Galerkin choice; different test functions give a Petrov--Galerkin formulation. The criteria coincide in special cases but differ when the hedge-instrument sensitivities are path-dependent. The paper gives the tensor and matrix forms of both reductions, discusses regularization and conditioning, and records implementation considerations. The constructions are motivated by sensitivity-based margin valuation adjustment and replication-consistent liquidity forecasting, where pathwise primitive sensitivities have to be converted into hedge ratios with respect to market instruments.

Suggested Citation

  • Christian P Fries, 2026. "Faster Forward Sensitivities: Reduced stochastic hedge ratios from pathwise algorithmic differentiation," Papers 2605.23979, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2605.23979
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2605.23979
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Longstaff, Francis A & Schwartz, Eduardo S, 2001. "Valuing American Options by Simulation: A Simple Least-Squares Approach," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 14(1), pages 113-147.
    2. Cristian Homescu, 2011. "Adjoints and Automatic (Algorithmic) Differentiation in Computational Finance," Papers 1107.1831, arXiv.org.
    3. Mark Broadie & Paul Glasserman, 1996. "Estimating Security Price Derivatives Using Simulation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 42(2), pages 269-285, February.
    4. Denis Belomestny & G. Milstein & John Schoenmakers, 2010. "Sensitivities for Bermudan options by regression methods," Decisions in Economics and Finance, Springer;Associazione per la Matematica, vol. 33(2), pages 117-138, November.
    5. repec:hum:wpaper:sfb649dp2007-048 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. St'ephane Cr'epey & Botao Li & Hoang Nguyen & Bouazza Saadeddine, 2024. "CVA Sensitivities, Hedging and Risk," Papers 2407.18583, arXiv.org.
    7. Longstaff, Francis A & Schwartz, Eduardo S, 2001. "Valuing American Options by Simulation: A Simple Least-Squares Approach," University of California at Los Angeles, Anderson Graduate School of Management qt43n1k4jb, Anderson Graduate School of Management, UCLA.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nan Chen & Yanchu Liu, 2014. "American Option Sensitivities Estimation via a Generalized Infinitesimal Perturbation Analysis Approach," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 62(3), pages 616-632, June.
    2. Lim, Terence & Lo, Andrew W. & Merton, Robert C. & Scholes, Myron S., 2006. "The Derivatives Sourcebook," Foundations and Trends(R) in Finance, now publishers, vol. 1(5–6), pages 365-572, April.
    3. Raoul Pietersz & Antoon Pelsser & Marcel van Regenmortel, . "Fast drift-approximated pricing in the BGM model," Journal of Computational Finance, Journal of Computational Finance.
    4. Vasile BRĂTIAN, 2018. "Evaluation of Options using the Monte Carlo Method and the Entropy of Information," Expert Journal of Economics, Sprint Investify, vol. 6(2), pages 35-43.
    5. BRATIAN Vasile, 2017. "Options Evaluation Using Monte Carlo Simulation," Revista Economica, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 69(4), pages 30-42, November.
    6. Ron Kaniel & Stathis Tompaidis & Alexander Zemlianov, 2008. "Efficient Computation of Hedging Parameters for Discretely Exercisable Options," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 56(4), pages 811-826, August.
    7. Carlos Andrés Zapata Quimbayo, 2020. "OPCIONES REALES Una guía teórico-práctica para la valoración de inversiones bajo incertidumbre mediante modelos en tiempo discreto y simulación de Monte Carlo," Books, Universidad Externado de Colombia, Facultad de Finanzas, Gobierno y Relaciones Internacionales, number 138.
    8. Jain, Shashi & Oosterlee, Cornelis W., 2015. "The Stochastic Grid Bundling Method: Efficient pricing of Bermudan options and their Greeks," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 269(C), pages 412-431.
    9. Magnus Grønnegaard Frandsen & Tobias Cramer Pedersen & Rolf Poulsen, 2022. "Delta force: option pricing with differential machine learning," Digital Finance, Springer, vol. 4(1), pages 1-15, March.
    10. Hendrik Kohrs & Hermann Mühlichen & Benjamin R. Auer, 2025. "Swing option-implied volatility," Review of Derivatives Research, Springer, vol. 28(3), pages 1-44, October.
    11. Gilles Pag`es & Olivier Pironneau & Guillaume Sall, 2016. "Vibrato and automatic differentiation for high order derivatives and sensitivities of financial options," Papers 1606.06143, arXiv.org.
    12. Chris Kenyon & Andrew Green, 2014. "Efficient XVA Management: Pricing, Hedging, and Attribution using Trade-Level Regression and Global Conditioning," Papers 1412.5332, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2014.
    13. Mark Broadie & Jerome B. Detemple, 2004. "ANNIVERSARY ARTICLE: Option Pricing: Valuation Models and Applications," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(9), pages 1145-1177, September.
    14. Boda Kang & Christina Nikitopoulos Sklibosios & Erik Schlogl & Blessing Taruvinga, 2019. "The Impact of Jumps on American Option Pricing: The S&P 100 Options Case," Research Paper Series 397, Quantitative Finance Research Centre, University of Technology, Sydney.
    15. Tebaldi, Claudio, 2005. "Hedging using simulation: a least squares approach," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 29(8), pages 1287-1312, August.
    16. Guangxin Jiang & L. Jeff Hong & Barry L. Nelson, 2020. "Online Risk Monitoring Using Offline Simulation," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 32(2), pages 356-375, April.
    17. Hendrik Kohrs & Hermann Mühlichen & Benjamin R. Auer & Frank Schuhmacher, 2019. "Pricing and risk of swing contracts in natural gas markets," Review of Derivatives Research, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 77-167, April.
    18. Fabozzi, Frank J. & Recchioni, Maria Cristina & Renò, Roberto, 2025. "Fifty years at the interface between financial modeling and operations research," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 327(1), pages 1-21.
    19. Pedro Duarte Gomes, 2024. "Mathematics of Differential Machine Learning in Derivative Pricing and Hedging," Papers 2405.01233, arXiv.org.
    20. Tian-Shyr Dai & Yuh-Dauh Lyuu, 2002. "Efficient, exact algorithms for asian options with multiresolution lattices," Review of Derivatives Research, Springer, vol. 5(2), pages 181-203, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2605.23979. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.