IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2603.23294.html

Granger Causality in Expectiles: an M-vine copula test

Author

Listed:
  • Roberto Fuentes-Mart'inez
  • Irene Crimaldi

Abstract

A model-free measure of Granger causality in expectiles is proposed, generalizing the traditional mean-based measure to arbitrary positions of the conditional distribution. Expectiles are the only law-invariant risk measures that are both coherent and elicitable, making them particularly well-suited for studying distributional Granger causality where risk quantification and forecast evaluation are both relevant. Based on this measure, a test is developed using M-vine copula models that accounts for multivariate Granger causality with $d+1$ series under non-linear and non-Gaussian dependence, without imposing parametric assumptions on the joint distribution. Strong consistency of the test statistic is established under some regularity conditions. In finite samples, simulations show accurate size control and power increasing with sample size. A key advantage is the joint testing capability: causal relationships invisible to pairwise tests can be detected, as demonstrated both theoretically and empirically. Two applications to international stock market indices at the global and Asian regional level illustrate the practical relevance of the proposed framework.

Suggested Citation

  • Roberto Fuentes-Mart'inez & Irene Crimaldi, 2026. "Granger Causality in Expectiles: an M-vine copula test," Papers 2603.23294, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2603.23294
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2603.23294
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lee, Tae-Hwy & Yang, Weiping, 2014. "Granger-causality in quantiles between financial markets: Using copula approach," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 70-78.
    2. Mehmet Balcilar & Rangan Gupta & Clement Kyei & Mark E. Wohar, 2016. "Does Economic Policy Uncertainty Predict Exchange Rate Returns and Volatility? Evidence from a Nonparametric Causality-in-Quantiles Test," Open Economies Review, Springer, vol. 27(2), pages 229-250, April.
    3. Jang, Hyuna & Kim, Jong-Min & Noh, Hohsuk, 2022. "Vine copula Granger causality in mean," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    4. Jeong, Kiho & Härdle, Wolfgang K. & Song, Song, 2012. "A Consistent Nonparametric Test For Causality In Quantile," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 28(4), pages 861-887, August.
    5. Johanna F. Ziegel, 2016. "Coherence And Elicitability," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(4), pages 901-918, October.
    6. Victor Troster, 2018. "Testing for Granger-causality in quantiles," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(8), pages 850-866, September.
    7. Xiaojun Song & Abderrahim Taamouti, 2021. "Measuring Granger Causality in Quantiles," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(4), pages 937-952, October.
    8. Fabio Bellini & Valeria Bignozzi, 2015. "On elicitable risk measures," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(5), pages 725-733, May.
    9. Nagler, Thomas & Krüger, Daniel & Min, Aleksey, 2022. "Stationary vine copula models for multivariate time series," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 227(2), pages 305-324.
    10. Taoufik Bouezmarni & Mohamed Doukali & Abderrahim Taamouti, 2024. "Testing Granger non-causality in expectiles," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(1), pages 30-51, January.
    11. Efstathios Paparoditis & Dimitris Politis, 2000. "The Local Bootstrap for Kernel Estimators under General Dependence Conditions," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 52(1), pages 139-159, March.
    12. Newey, Whitney K & Powell, James L, 1987. "Asymmetric Least Squares Estimation and Testing," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 55(4), pages 819-847, July.
    13. R. Cont, 2001. "Empirical properties of asset returns: stylized facts and statistical issues," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 1(2), pages 223-236.
    14. Brendan K. Beare & Juwon Seo, 2015. "Vine Copula Specifications for Stationary Multivariate Markov Chains," Journal of Time Series Analysis, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(2), pages 228-246, March.
    15. Philippe Artzner & Freddy Delbaen & Jean‐Marc Eber & David Heath, 1999. "Coherent Measures of Risk," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 9(3), pages 203-228, July.
    16. Roberto Fuentes-Mart'inez & Irene Crimaldi & Armando Rungi, 2024. "Non-linear dependence and Granger causality: A vine copula approach," Papers 2409.15070, arXiv.org, revised May 2025.
    17. Smith, Michael Stanley, 2015. "Copula modelling of dependence in multivariate time series," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 815-833.
    18. Xiaojun Song & Abderrahim Taamouti, 2018. "Measuring Nonlinear Granger Causality in Mean," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(2), pages 321-333, April.
    19. Bellini, Fabio & Klar, Bernhard & Müller, Alfred & Rosazza Gianin, Emanuela, 2014. "Generalized quantiles as risk measures," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 41-48.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Roberto Fuentes-Mart'inez & Irene Crimaldi & Armando Rungi, 2024. "Non-linear dependence and Granger causality: A vine copula approach," Papers 2409.15070, arXiv.org, revised May 2025.
    2. Taoufik Bouezmarni & Mohamed Doukali & Abderrahim Taamouti, 2024. "Testing Granger non-causality in expectiles," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(1), pages 30-51, January.
    3. Righi, Marcelo Brutti & Müller, Fernanda Maria & Moresco, Marlon Ruoso, 2025. "A risk measurement approach from risk-averse stochastic optimization of score functions," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 42-50.
    4. Hakim, Arief & Salman, A.N.M. & Syuhada, Khreshna, 2025. "Conditional generalized quantiles as systemic risk measures: Properties, estimation, and application," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 235(C), pages 60-84.
    5. Del Brio, Esther B. & Mora-Valencia, Andrés & Perote, Javier, 2020. "Risk quantification for commodity ETFs: Backtesting value-at-risk and expected shortfall," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    6. Maziar Sahamkhadam, 2021. "Dynamic copula-based expectile portfolios," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 22(3), pages 209-223, May.
    7. Zhang, Feipeng & Xu, Yixiong & Fan, Caiyun, 2023. "Nonparametric inference of expectile-based value-at-risk for financial time series with application to risk assessment," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    8. James Ming Chen, 2018. "On Exactitude in Financial Regulation: Value-at-Risk, Expected Shortfall, and Expectiles," Risks, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-28, June.
    9. Jang, Hyuna & Kim, Jong-Min & Noh, Hohsuk, 2022. "Vine copula Granger causality in mean," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    10. Tadese, Mekonnen & Drapeau, Samuel, 2020. "Relative bound and asymptotic comparison of expectile with respect to expected shortfall," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 387-399.
    11. Garg, Divyanee & Khan, Ahmad Zaman & Mehra, Aparna, 2026. "Enhanced indexing using cumulative prospect theory utility function with expectile risk," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    12. Tobias Fissler & Fangda Liu & Ruodu Wang & Linxiao Wei, 2024. "Elicitability and identifiability of tail risk measures," Papers 2404.14136, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2025.
    13. Hamel, Andreas H. & Ha, Thi Khanh Linh, 2025. "Set-valued expectiles for ordered data analysis," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    14. Fabio Bellini & Bernhard Klar & Alfred Müller, 2018. "Expectiles, Omega Ratios and Stochastic Ordering," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 855-873, September.
    15. Feipeng Zhang & Yuhan Ma & Yongchang Hui, 2026. "A Direct Nonparametric Estimator for EVaR of Dependent Financial Returns," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 67(2), pages 991-1008, February.
    16. Abbas, Yasser & Daouia, Abdelaati & Nemouchi, Boutheina & Stupfler, Gilles, 2025. "Tail expectile-VaR estimation in the semiparametric Generalized Pareto model," TSE Working Papers 25-1607, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE), revised 10 Jun 2026.
    17. Bingzhen Geng & Yang Liu & Yimiao Zhao, 2024. "Value-at-Risk- and Expectile-based Systemic Risk Measures and Second-order Asymptotics: With Applications to Diversification," Papers 2404.18029, arXiv.org, revised May 2026.
    18. Mohammedi, Mustapha & Bouzebda, Salim & Laksaci, Ali, 2021. "The consistency and asymptotic normality of the kernel type expectile regression estimator for functional data," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    19. C. Adam & I. Gijbels, 2025. "Nonparametric estimation of conditional expectile-based risk measures," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 34(5), pages 939-977, November.
    20. Fangda Liu & Ruodu Wang, 2021. "A Theory for Measures of Tail Risk," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 46(3), pages 1109-1128, August.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2603.23294. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.