IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2507.07037.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Cognitive Load and Information Processing in Financial Markets: Theory and Evidence from Disclosure Complexity

Author

Listed:
  • Yimin Du
  • Guolin Tang

Abstract

We develop a theoretical framework for understanding how cognitive load affects information processing in financial markets and test it using exogenous variation in disclosure complexity. Our model distinguishes between attention allocation and cognitive processing capacity, showing that complex information creates differential effects across investor types. Using a comprehensive dataset of corporate disclosures and a novel identification strategy based on regulatory changes, we find that cognitive load significantly impairs price discovery, with effects concentrated among less sophisticated investors. A one-standard-deviation increase in cognitive complexity reduces information incorporation speed by 18\% and increases mispricing duration by 23\%. We provide evidence for three theoretical mechanisms: selective attention, processing errors, and strategic complexity. Our findings suggest that cognitive constraints create systematic inefficiencies in financial markets, with important implications for disclosure regulation and market design.

Suggested Citation

  • Yimin Du & Guolin Tang, 2025. "Cognitive Load and Information Processing in Financial Markets: Theory and Evidence from Disclosure Complexity," Papers 2507.07037, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2507.07037
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2507.07037
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2507.07037. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.