IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2505.04301.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Exit Incentives for Carbon Emissive Firms

Author

Listed:
  • Ren'e Aid
  • Xiangying Pang
  • Xiaolu Tan

Abstract

We develop a continuous-time model of incentives for carbon emissive firms to exit the market based on a compensation payment identical to all firms. In our model, firms enjoy profits from production modeled as a simple geometric Brownian motion and do not bear any environmental damage from production. A regulator maximises the expected discounted value of firms profits from production minus environmental damages caused by production and proposes a compensation payment whose dynamics is known to the firms. We provide in both situations closed-form expressions for the compensation payment process and the exit thresholds of each firms. We apply our model to the crude oil market. We show that market concentration both reduces the total expected discounted payment to firms and the expected closing time of polluting assets. We extend this framework to the case of two countries each regulating its own market. The presence of a second mover advantage leads to the possibility of multiple equilibria. Applying this result to large producing countries, we find that they are unlikely to agree on the timing to exit market.

Suggested Citation

  • Ren'e Aid & Xiangying Pang & Xiaolu Tan, 2025. "Exit Incentives for Carbon Emissive Firms," Papers 2505.04301, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2505.04301
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2505.04301
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jakša Cvitanić & Dylan Possamaï & Nizar Touzi, 2018. "Dynamic programming approach to principal–agent problems," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 1-37, January.
    2. de Wit, Gerrit, 2005. "Firm size distributions: An overview of steady-state distributions resulting from firm dynamics models," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 23(5-6), pages 423-450, June.
    3. Milgrom,Paul, 2004. "Putting Auction Theory to Work," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521536721, June.
    4. Xavier Gabaix, 2016. "Power Laws in Economics: An Introduction," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 30(1), pages 185-206, Winter.
    5. Montgomery, W. David, 1972. "Markets in licenses and efficient pollution control programs," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 5(3), pages 395-418, December.
    6. Gollier, Christian, 2010. "Ecological discounting," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 145(2), pages 812-829, March.
    7. Erik Biørn & Rolf Golombek* & Arvid Raknerud, 1998. "Environmental Regulations and Plant Exit," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 11(1), pages 35-59, January.
    8. Bouveret, Géraldine & Dumitrescu, Roxana & Tankov, Peter, 2022. "Technological change in water use: A mean-field game approach to optimal investment timing," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 9(C).
    9. René Aïd & Roxana Dumitrescu & Peter Tankov, 2021. "The entry and exit game in the electricity markets: A mean-field game approach," Post-Print hal-03215763, HAL.
    10. Yuliy Sannikov, 2008. "A Continuous-Time Version of the Principal-Agent Problem," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 75(3), pages 957-984.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Thibaut Mastrolia & Dylan Possamaï, 2018. "Moral Hazard Under Ambiguity," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 179(2), pages 452-500, November.
    2. Scott Duke Kominers & Alexander Teytelboym & Vincent P Crawford, 2017. "An invitation to market design," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 33(4), pages 541-571.
    3. Beatrice Acciaio & Robert A. Crowell & Jakša Cvitanić, 2025. "A note on persistent private information," Mathematics and Financial Economics, Springer, volume 19, number 5, September.
    4. Romuald Élie & Emma Hubert & Thibaut Mastrolia & Dylan Possamaï, 2021. "Mean–field moral hazard for optimal energy demand response management," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(1), pages 399-473, January.
    5. Camilo Hernández & Dylan Possamaï, 2024. "Time‐inconsistent contract theory," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(3), pages 1022-1085, July.
    6. Ren'e Aid & Dylan Possamai & Nizar Touzi, 2018. "Optimal electricity demand response contracting with responsiveness incentives," Papers 1810.09063, arXiv.org, revised May 2019.
    7. Jessica Martin & Stéphane Villeneuve, 2021. "A Class of Explicit optimal contracts in the face of shutdown," Working Papers hal-03124102, HAL.
    8. Jean-Paul Décamps & Stéphane Villeneuve, 2019. "A two-dimensional control problem arising from dynamic contracting theory," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 1-28, January.
    9. Kaitong Hu & Zhenjie Ren & Junjian Yang, 2019. "Principal-agent problem with multiple principals," Working Papers hal-02088486, HAL.
    10. Jessica Martin & Stéphane Villeneuve, 2023. "Risk-sharing and optimal contracts with large exogenous risks," Post-Print hal-04164688, HAL.
    11. Thibaut Mastrolia & Tianrui Xu, 2025. "Optimal Rebate Design: Incentives, Competition and Efficiency in Auction Markets," Papers 2501.12591, arXiv.org.
    12. Martin, Jessica & Villeneuve, Stéphane, 2021. "A Class of Explicit optimal contracts in the face of shutdown," TSE Working Papers 21-1183, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE), revised Apr 2022.
    13. Dylan Possamai & Chiara Rossato, 2023. "Golden parachutes under the threat of accidents," Papers 2312.02101, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2024.
    14. Sarah Bensalem & Nicolás Hernández-Santibáñez & Nabil Kazi-Tani, 2023. "A continuous-time model of self-protection," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 27(2), pages 503-537, April.
    15. Eduardo Abi Jaber & Stéphane Villeneuve, 2025. "Gaussian agency problems with memory and linear contracts," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 29(1), pages 143-176, January.
    16. Villeneuve, Stéphane & Abi Jaber, Eduardo, 2022. "Gaussian Agency problems with memory and Linear Contracts," TSE Working Papers 22-1363, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE).
    17. Romuald Elie & Emma Hubert & Thibaut Mastrolia & Dylan Possamai, 2019. "Mean-field moral hazard for optimal energy demand response management," Papers 1902.10405, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2020.
    18. Guillermo Alonso Alvarez & Erhan Bayraktar & Ibrahim Ekren & Liwei Huang, 2024. "Sequential optimal contracting in continuous time," Papers 2411.04262, arXiv.org.
    19. Wada, Kentaro & Akamatsu, Takashi, 2013. "A hybrid implementation mechanism of tradable network permits system which obviates path enumeration: An auction mechanism with day-to-day capacity control," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 94-112.
    20. Dena Firoozi & Arvind V Shrivats & Sebastian Jaimungal, 2021. "Principal agent mean field games in REC markets," Papers 2112.11963, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2022.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2505.04301. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.