IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2502.12026.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Analysis of the Order Flow Auction under Proposer-Builder Separation

Author

Listed:
  • Ruofei Ma
  • Wenpin Tang
  • David Yao

Abstract

In this paper, we consider the impact of the order flow auction (OFA) in the context of the proposer-builder separation (PBS) mechanism through a game-theoretic perspective. The OFA is designed to improve user welfare by redistributing maximal extractable value (MEV) to the users, in which two auctions take place: the order flow auction and the block-building auction. We formulate the OFA as a multiplayer game, and focus our analyses on the case of two competing players (builders). We prove the existence and uniqueness of a Nash equilibrium for the two-player game, and derive a closed-form solution by solving a quartic equation. Our result shows that the builder with a competitive advantage pays a relatively lower cost, leading to centralization in the builder space. In contrast, the proposer's shares evolve as a martingale process, which implies decentralization in the proposer (or, validator) space. Our analyses rely on various tools from stochastic processes, convex optimization, and polynomial equations. We also conduct numerical studies to corroborate our findings, and explore other features of the OFA under the PBS mechanism.

Suggested Citation

  • Ruofei Ma & Wenpin Tang & David Yao, 2025. "Analysis of the Order Flow Auction under Proposer-Builder Separation," Papers 2502.12026, arXiv.org.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2502.12026
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2502.12026
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tivas Gupta & Mallesh M Pai & Max Resnick, 2023. "The Centralizing Effects of Private Order Flow on Proposer-Builder Separation," Papers 2305.19150, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2023.
    2. Ioanid Roşu & Fahad Saleh, 2021. "Evolution of Shares in a Proof-of-Stake Cryptocurrency," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(2), pages 661-672, February.
    3. Maryam Bahrani & Pranav Garimidi & Tim Roughgarden, 2024. "Centralization in Block Building and Proposer-Builder Separation," Papers 2401.12120, arXiv.org.
    4. Mallesh Pai & Max Resnick, 2023. "Structural Advantages for Integrated Builders in MEV-Boost," Papers 2311.09083, arXiv.org.
    5. Wenpin Tang & David D. Yao, 2022. "Polynomial Voting Rules," Papers 2206.10105, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2024.
    6. Wenpin Tang, 2022. "Stability of shares in the Proof of Stake Protocol -- Concentration and Phase Transitions," Papers 2206.02227, arXiv.org.
    7. Jiani Wu & Nguyen Khoi Tran, 2018. "Application of Blockchain Technology in Sustainable Energy Systems: An Overview," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-22, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wenpin Tang & David D. Yao, 2022. "Trading under the Proof-of-Stake Protocol -- a Continuous-Time Control Approach," Papers 2207.12581, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2023.
    2. Wenpin Tang, 2023. "Trading and wealth evolution in the Proof of Stake protocol," Papers 2308.01803, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2023.
    3. Ruofei Ma & Zhebiao Cai & Wenpin Tang & David Yao, 2025. "Optimal Decisions for Liquid Staking: Allocation and Exit Timing," Papers 2507.14810, arXiv.org.
    4. Wenpin Tang & David D. Yao, 2023. "Transaction fee mechanism for Proof-of-Stake protocol," Papers 2308.13881, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2023.
    5. Vabuk Pahari & Andrea Canidio, 2025. "How Exclusive are Ethereum Transactions? Evidence from non-winning blocks," Papers 2509.16052, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2025.
    6. Vincent Gramlich & Dennis Jelito & Johannes Sedlmeir, 2024. "Maximal extractable value: Current understanding, categorization, and open research questions," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 34(1), pages 1-21, December.
    7. Feng Xue & Kang Chang & Wei Li & Qin Wang & Haitao Zhao & Hui Zhang & Yiyang Ni & Wenchao Xia, 2022. "Blockchain Smart Contract-Enabled Secure Energy Trading for Electric Vehicles," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-15, September.
    8. Aikaterini Papapostolou & Ioanna Andreoulaki & Filippos Anagnostopoulos & Sokratis Divolis & Harris Niavis & Sokratis Vavilis & Vangelis Marinakis, 2025. "Innovative Business Models Towards Sustainable Energy Development: Assessing Benefits, Risks, and Optimal Approaches of Blockchain Exploitation in the Energy Transition," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-45, August.
    9. Ernest Barceló & Katarina Dimić-Mišić & Monir Imani & Vesna Spasojević Brkić & Michael Hummel & Patrick Gane, 2023. "Regulatory Paradigm and Challenge for Blockchain Integration of Decentralized Systems: Example—Renewable Energy Grids," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-27, January.
    10. Jonah Burian & Davide Crapis & Fahad Saleh, 2024. "MEV Capture and Decentralization in Execution Tickets," Papers 2408.11255, arXiv.org.
    11. Dongdong Zhang & Jun Tian & Hui-Hwang Goh & Hui Liu & Xiang Li & Hongyu Zhu & Xinzhang Wu, 2022. "The Key Technology of Smart Energy System and Its Disciplinary Teaching Reform Measures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-29, October.
    12. Andrew Komo & Scott Duke Kominers & Tim Roughgarden, 2024. "Shill-Proof Auctions," Papers 2404.00475, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2024.
    13. Ahl, A. & Yarime, M. & Goto, M. & Chopra, Shauhrat S. & Kumar, Nallapaneni Manoj. & Tanaka, K. & Sagawa, D., 2020. "Exploring blockchain for the energy transition: Opportunities and challenges based on a case study in Japan," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    14. Yahia Baashar & Gamal Alkawsi & Ammar Ahmed Alkahtani & Wahidah Hashim & Rina Azlin Razali & Sieh Kiong Tiong, 2021. "Toward Blockchain Technology in the Energy Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-20, August.
    15. Nicola Dimitri, 2022. "The Economics of Consensus in Algorand," FinTech, MDPI, vol. 1(2), pages 1-16, May.
    16. Ahl, Amanda & Yarime, Masaru & Tanaka, Kenji & Sagawa, Daishi, 2019. "Review of blockchain-based distributed energy: Implications for institutional development," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 200-211.
    17. Thomas Puschmann & Christian Hugo Hoffmann & Valentyn Khmarskyi, 2020. "How Green FinTech Can Alleviate the Impact of Climate Change—The Case of Switzerland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-30, December.
    18. repec:osf:osfxxx:6ceuz_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Albérico Travassos Rosário & Paula Rosa Lopes & Filipe Sales Rosário, 2025. "How Digital Development Leverages Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-34, July.
    20. Narendra Gariya & Anjas Asrani & Adhirath Mandal & Amir Shaikh & Dowan Cha, 2025. "A Comprehensive Analysis of Integrating Blockchain Technology into the Energy Supply Chain for the Enhancement of Transparency and Sustainability," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-24, June.
    21. Tom Celig & Tim Alvaro Ockenga & Detlef Schoder, 2025. "Distributional equality in Ethereum? On-chain analysis of Ether supply distribution and supply dynamics," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-15, December.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2502.12026. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.