IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2502.11052.html

Time-consistent portfolio selection with monotone mean-variance preferences

Author

Listed:
  • Yike Wang
  • Yusha Chen
  • Jingzhen Liu

Abstract

We investigate time-inconsistent portfolio problems under a broader class of monotone mean-variance (MMV) preferences. Since the optimal strategies for MMV and mean-variance (MV) preferences coincide, the MMV optimal strategies at different initial times are necessarily time-inconsistent. To address this time-inconsistency, we consider Nash equilibrium controls of both open-loop and closed-loop types, and characterize them within a random parameter setting. The two control problems reduce to solving a flow of forward-backward stochastic differential equations and a system of extended Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman equations, respectively. In particular, we derive semi-closed-form solutions for both types of equilibria under a deterministic parameter setting, and both solutions share the same representation, which is independent of the wealth state and the random path. We show that the investment amount under the MMV equilibrium exceeds that under the MV equilibrium, and the gap narrows over time. Furthermore, under a constant parameter setting, we find that the derived closed-loop Nash equilibrium control is a strong equilibrium strategy only when the interest rate is sufficiently large, whereas the derived open-loop Nash equilibrium control is necessarily a strong equilibrium strategy.

Suggested Citation

  • Yike Wang & Yusha Chen & Jingzhen Liu, 2025. "Time-consistent portfolio selection with monotone mean-variance preferences," Papers 2502.11052, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2026.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2502.11052
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2502.11052
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Suleyman Basak & Georgy Chabakauri, 2010. "Dynamic Mean-Variance Asset Allocation," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 23(8), pages 2970-3016, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiang Meng, 2019. "Dynamic Mean-Variance Portfolio Optimisation," Papers 1907.03093, arXiv.org.
    2. Luca De Gennaro Aquino & Sascha Desmettre & Yevhen Havrylenko & Mogens Steffensen, 2024. "Equilibrium control theory for Kihlstrom-Mirman preferences in continuous time," Papers 2407.16525, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2024.
    3. Suleyman Basak & Georgy Chabakauri, 2012. "Dynamic Hedging in Incomplete Markets: A Simple Solution," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 25(6), pages 1845-1896.
    4. Xiangyu Cui & Xun Li & Duan Li & Yun Shi, 2014. "Time Consistent Behavior Portfolio Policy for Dynamic Mean-Variance Formulation," Papers 1408.6070, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2015.
    5. Fahrenwaldt, Matthias Albrecht & Jensen, Ninna Reitzel & Steffensen, Mogens, 2020. "Nonrecursive separation of risk and time preferences," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 95-108.
    6. Michele Berardi, 2021. "Learning from prices: information aggregation and accumulation in an asset market," Annals of Finance, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 45-77, March.
    7. Liyuan Wang & Zhiping Chen, 2019. "Stochastic Game Theoretic Formulation for a Multi-Period DC Pension Plan with State-Dependent Risk Aversion," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-16, January.
    8. Alia, Ishak & Chighoub, Farid & Sohail, Ayesha, 2016. "A characterization of equilibrium strategies in continuous-time mean–variance problems for insurers," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 212-223.
    9. Min Dai & Zuo Quan Xu & Xun Yu Zhou, 2009. "Continuous-Time Markowitz's Model with Transaction Costs," Papers 0906.0678, arXiv.org.
    10. Chen, Kexin & Wong, Hoi Ying, 2019. "Time-consistent mean-variance hedging of an illiquid asset with a cointegrated liquid asset," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 184-192.
    11. Qinglong Zhou & Gaofeng Zong, 2016. "Time-Inconsistent Stochastic Linear-quadratic Differential Game," Papers 1607.00638, arXiv.org.
    12. Pengyu Wei & Zuo Quan Xu, 2021. "Dynamic growth-optimum portfolio choice under risk control," Papers 2112.14451, arXiv.org.
    13. Marcel Nutz & Yuchong Zhang, 2019. "Conditional Optimal Stopping: A Time-Inconsistent Optimization," Papers 1901.05802, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2019.
    14. Yue Cao & Zongxia Liang & Sheng Wang & Xiang Yu, 2025. "Equilibrium Portfolio Selection under Utility-Variance Analysis of Log Returns in Incomplete Markets," Papers 2511.05861, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2025.
    15. Liyuan Lin & Fangda Liu & Jingzhen Liu abd Luyang Yu, 2023. "The optimal reinsurance strategy with price-competition between two reinsurers," Papers 2305.00509, arXiv.org.
    16. Bosserhoff, Frank & Stadje, Mitja, 2021. "Time-consistent mean-variance investment with unit linked life insurance contracts in a jump-diffusion setting," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 130-146.
    17. Gerry Tsoukalas & Jiang Wang & Kay Giesecke, 2019. "Dynamic Portfolio Execution," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(5), pages 2015-2040, May.
    18. Ying Hu & Hanqing Jin & Xun Yu Zhou, 2011. "Time-Inconsistent Stochastic Linear--Quadratic Control," Papers 1111.0818, arXiv.org.
    19. Xiangyu Cui & Duan Li & Xun Li, 2014. "Mean-Variance Policy for Discrete-time Cone Constrained Markets: The Consistency in Efficiency and Minimum-Variance Signed Supermartingale Measure," Papers 1403.0718, arXiv.org.
    20. Ting-Fu Chen & Xian-Ji Kuang & Szu-Lang Liao & Shih-Kuei Lin, 2024. "Portfolio Allocation with Dynamic Risk Preferences via Reinforcement Learning," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 64(4), pages 2033-2052, October.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2502.11052. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.