IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2309.05054.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Gamma Hedging and Rough Paths

Author

Listed:
  • John Armstrong
  • Andrei Ionescu

Abstract

We apply rough-path theory to study the discrete-time gamma-hedging strategy. We show that if a trader knows that the market price of a set of European options will be given by a diffusive pricing model, then the discrete-time gamma-hedging strategy will enable them to replicate other European options so long as the underlying pricing signal is sufficiently regular. This is a sure result and does not require that the underlying pricing signal has a quadratic variation corresponding to a probabilisitic pricing model. We show how to generalise this result to exotic derivatives when the gamma is defined to be the Gubinelli derivative of the delta by deriving rough-path versions of the Clark--Ocone formula which hold surely. We illustrate our theory by proving that if the stock price process is sufficiently regular, as is the implied volatility process of a European derivative with maturity $T$ and smooth payoff $f(S_T)$ satisfying $f^{\prime \prime}>0$, one can replicate with certainty any European derivative with smooth payoff and maturity $T$.

Suggested Citation

  • John Armstrong & Andrei Ionescu, 2023. "Gamma Hedging and Rough Paths," Papers 2309.05054, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2024.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2309.05054
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2309.05054
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Julio Backhoff-Veraguas & Daniel Bartl & Mathias Beiglböck & Manu Eder, 2020. "Adapted Wasserstein distances and stability in mathematical finance," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 601-632, July.
    2. David G. Hobson, 1998. "Robust hedging of the lookback option," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 2(4), pages 329-347.
    3. Eric Fournié & Jean-Michel Lasry & Pierre-Louis Lions & Jérôme Lebuchoux & Nizar Touzi, 1999. "Applications of Malliavin calculus to Monte Carlo methods in finance," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 3(4), pages 391-412.
    4. John Armstrong & Claudio Bellani & Damiano Brigo & Thomas Cass, 2021. "Option pricing models without probability: a rough paths approach," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 1494-1521, October.
    5. Steve Heston & Guofu Zhou, 2000. "On the Rate of Convergence of Discrete‐Time Contingent Claims," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 10(1), pages 53-75, January.
    6. Terry Lyons & Sina Nejad & Imanol Perez Arribas, 2020. "Non-parametric Pricing and Hedging of Exotic Derivatives," Applied Mathematical Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(6), pages 457-494, November.
    7. Nicole El Karoui & Monique Jeanblanc‐Picquè & Steven E. Shreve, 1998. "Robustness of the Black and Scholes Formula," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 8(2), pages 93-126, April.
    8. Eric Fournié & Jean-Michel Lasry & Pierre-Louis Lions & Jérôme Lebuchoux, 2001. "Applications of Malliavin calculus to Monte-Carlo methods in finance. II," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 5(2), pages 201-236.
    9. Simon Ellersgaard & Martin Jönsson & Rolf Poulsen, 2017. "The Fundamental Theorem of Derivative Trading - exposition, extensions and experiments," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(4), pages 515-529, April.
    10. Nicolas Perkowski & David J. Promel, 2013. "Pathwise stochastic integrals for model free finance," Papers 1311.6187, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2016.
    11. Julio Backhoff-Veraguas & Daniel Bartl & Mathias Beiglbock & Manu Eder, 2019. "Adapted Wasserstein Distances and Stability in Mathematical Finance," Papers 1901.07450, arXiv.org, revised May 2020.
    12. M. Avellaneda & A. Levy & A. ParAS, 1995. "Pricing and hedging derivative securities in markets with uncertain volatilities," Applied Mathematical Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2(2), pages 73-88.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Daniel Krv{s}ek & Gudmund Pammer, 2024. "General duality and dual attainment for adapted transport," Papers 2401.11958, arXiv.org.
    2. Daniel Bartl & Michael Kupper & David J. Prömel & Ludovic Tangpi, 2019. "Duality for pathwise superhedging in continuous time," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 697-728, July.
    3. Park, Kyunghyun & Wong, Hoi Ying & Yan, Tingjin, 2023. "Robust retirement and life insurance with inflation risk and model ambiguity," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 1-30.
    4. N. Hilber & N. Reich & C. Schwab & C. Winter, 2009. "Numerical methods for Lévy processes," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 13(4), pages 471-500, September.
    5. Daniel Bartl & Michael Kupper & Ariel Neufeld, 2020. "Pathwise superhedging on prediction sets," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 215-248, January.
    6. Beatrice Acciaio & Mathias Beiglboeck & Gudmund Pammer, 2020. "Weak Transport for Non-Convex Costs and Model-independence in a Fixed-Income Market," Papers 2011.04274, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2023.
    7. John Armstrong & Claudio Bellani & Damiano Brigo & Thomas Cass, 2021. "Option pricing models without probability: a rough paths approach," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 1494-1521, October.
    8. Daniel Bartl & Michael Kupper & David J. Promel & Ludovic Tangpi, 2017. "Duality for pathwise superhedging in continuous time," Papers 1705.02933, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2019.
    9. Julio Backhoff-Veraguas & Daniel Bartl & Mathias Beiglböck & Manu Eder, 2020. "Adapted Wasserstein distances and stability in mathematical finance," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 601-632, July.
    10. Sebastian Herrmann & Johannes Muhle-Karbe & Frank Thomas Seifried, 2017. "Hedging with small uncertainty aversion," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 1-64, January.
    11. Daniel Bartl & Michael Kupper & Ariel Neufeld, 2017. "Pathwise superhedging on prediction sets," Papers 1711.02764, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2019.
    12. Daniel Bartl & Johannes Wiesel, 2022. "Sensitivity of multiperiod optimization problems in adapted Wasserstein distance," Papers 2208.05656, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2023.
    13. Chen An & Mahayni Antje B., 2008. "Endowment Assurance Products: Effectiveness of Risk-Minimizing Strategies under Model Risk," Asia-Pacific Journal of Risk and Insurance, De Gruyter, vol. 2(2), pages 1-29, March.
    14. Maria Elvira Mancino & Simona Sanfelici, 2020. "Nonparametric Malliavin–Monte Carlo Computation of Hedging Greeks," Risks, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-17, November.
    15. Anne Laure Bronstein & Gilles Pagès & Jacques Portès, 2013. "Multi-asset American Options and Parallel Quantization," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 547-561, September.
    16. Jakša Cvitanić & Jin Ma & Jianfeng Zhang, 2003. "Efficient Computation of Hedging Portfolios for Options with Discontinuous Payoffs," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 13(1), pages 135-151, January.
    17. Giorgio Fabbri & Fausto Gozzi & Andrzej Swiech, 2017. "Stochastic Optimal Control in Infinite Dimensions - Dynamic Programming and HJB Equations," Post-Print hal-01505767, HAL.
    18. Arturo Kohatsu-Higa & Miquel Montero, 2001. "An application of Malliavin Calculus to Finance," Papers cond-mat/0111563, arXiv.org.
    19. Jérôme Detemple & René Garcia & Marcel Rindisbacher, 2005. "Asymptotic Properties of Monte Carlo Estimators of Derivatives," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(11), pages 1657-1675, November.
    20. Coffie, Emmanuel & Duedahl, Sindre & Proske, Frank, 2023. "Sensitivity analysis with respect to a stochastic stock price model with rough volatility via a Bismut–Elworthy–Li formula for singular SDEs," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 156-195.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2309.05054. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.