IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2306.13681.html

Estimating the Value of Evidence-Based Decision Making

Author

Listed:
  • Alberto Abadie
  • Anish Agarwal
  • Guido Imbens
  • Siwei Jia
  • James McQueen
  • Serguei Stepaniants
  • Santiago Torres

Abstract

In an era of data abundance, statistical evidence is increasingly critical for business and policy decisions. Yet, organizations lack empirical tools to assess the value of evidence-based decision making (EBDM), optimize statistical precision, and balance the costs of evidence-gathering strategies against their benefits. To tackle these challenges, this article introduces an empirical framework to estimate the value of EBDM and evaluate the return on investment in statistical precision and project ideation. The framework leverages parametric and nonparametric empirical Bayes methods to account for parameter heterogeneity and measure how statistical precision changes the value of evidence. The value extracted from statistical evidence depends critically on how organizations translate evidence into policy decisions. Commonly used decision rules based on statistical significance can leave substantial value unrealized and, in some cases, generate negative expected value.

Suggested Citation

  • Alberto Abadie & Anish Agarwal & Guido Imbens & Siwei Jia & James McQueen & Serguei Stepaniants & Santiago Torres, 2023. "Estimating the Value of Evidence-Based Decision Making," Papers 2306.13681, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2026.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2306.13681
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2306.13681
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Koenker, Roger & Mizera, Ivan, 2014. "Convex Optimization in R," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 60(i05).
    2. Roger Koenker & Ivan Mizera, 2014. "Convex Optimization, Shape Constraints, Compound Decisions, and Empirical Bayes Rules," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 109(506), pages 674-685, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Yihe & Zhao, Sihai Dave, 2021. "A nonparametric empirical Bayes approach to large-scale multivariate regression," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    2. Timothy B. Armstrong & Michal Kolesár & Mikkel Plagborg‐Møller, 2022. "Robust Empirical Bayes Confidence Intervals," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 90(6), pages 2567-2602, November.
    3. Feng, Long & Dicker, Lee H., 2018. "Approximate nonparametric maximum likelihood for mixture models: A convex optimization approach to fitting arbitrary multivariate mixing distributions," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 80-91.
    4. Jiafeng Chen, 2022. "Empirical Bayes When Estimation Precision Predicts Parameters," Papers 2212.14444, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2025.
    5. Li Tan & Cory Koedel, 2019. "The Effects of Differential Income Replacement and Mortality on U.S. Social Security Redistribution," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 86(2), pages 613-637, October.
    6. Yeil Kwon & Zhigen Zhao, 2023. "On F-modelling-based empirical Bayes estimation of variances," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 110(1), pages 69-81.
    7. Roger Koenker, 2017. "Bayesian deconvolution: an R vinaigrette," CeMMAP working papers 38/17, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    8. Jackson Bunting & Paul Diegert & Arnaud Maurel, 2024. "Heterogeneity, Uncertainty and Learning: Semiparametric Identification and Estimation," NBER Working Papers 32164, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    9. Jiaying Gu & Roger Koenker, 2020. "Invidious Comparisons: Ranking and Selection as Compound Decisions," Papers 2012.12550, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2021.
    10. Michael Gilraine & Jiaying Gu & Robert McMillan, 2021. "A Nonparametric Method for Estimating Teacher Value-Added," Working Papers tecipa-689, University of Toronto, Department of Economics.
    11. Soonwoo Kwon, 2023. "Optimal Shrinkage Estimation of Fixed Effects in Linear Panel Data Models," Papers 2308.12485, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2025.
    12. Jiaying Gu & Roger Koenker, 2018. "Nonparametric maximum likelihood methods for binary response models with random coefficients," Papers 1811.03329, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2020.
    13. Stéphane Bonhomme & Martin Weidner, 2019. "Posterior average effects," CeMMAP working papers CWP43/19, Centre for Microdata Methods and Practice, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    14. Jiaying Gu & Roger Koenker, 2014. "Unobserved heterogeneity in income dynamics: an empirical Bayes perspective," CeMMAP working papers 43/14, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    15. Sihai Dave Zhao, 2017. "Integrative genetic risk prediction using non-parametric empirical Bayes classification," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 73(2), pages 582-592, June.
    16. Roger Koenker, 2017. "Bayesian deconvolution: an R vinaigrette," CeMMAP working papers CWP38/17, Centre for Microdata Methods and Practice, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    17. Jiaying Gu & Roger Koenker, 2017. "Rebayes: an R package for empirical bayes mixture methods," CeMMAP working papers 37/17, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    18. Li, Xiaoou & Chen, Yunxiao & Chen, Xi & Liu, Jingchen & Ying, Zhiliang, 2021. "Optimal stopping and worker selection in crowdsourcing: an adaptive sequential probability ratio test framework," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 100873, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    19. Jiaying Gu & Roger Koenker, 2017. "Rebayes: an R package for empirical bayes mixture methods," CeMMAP working papers CWP37/17, Centre for Microdata Methods and Practice, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    20. Jiaying Gu & Roger Koenker & Stanislav Volgushev, 2017. "Testing for homogeneity in mixture models," CeMMAP working papers 39/17, Institute for Fiscal Studies.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2306.13681. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.