IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2206.14844.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Minimal Kullback-Leibler Divergence for Constrained L\'evy-It\^o Processes

Author

Listed:
  • Sebastian Jaimungal
  • Silvana M. Pesenti
  • Leandro S'anchez-Betancourt

Abstract

Given an n-dimensional stochastic process X driven by P-Brownian motions and Poisson random measures, we seek the probability measure Q, with minimal relative entropy to P, such that the Q-expectations of some terminal and running costs are constrained. We prove existence and uniqueness of the optimal probability measure, derive the explicit form of the measure change, and characterise the optimal drift and compensator adjustments under the optimal measure. We provide an analytical solution for Value-at-Risk (quantile) constraints, discuss how to perturb a Brownian motion to have arbitrary variance, and show that pinned measures arise as a limiting case of optimal measures. The results are illustrated in a risk management setting -- including an algorithm to simulate under the optimal measure -- where an agent seeks to answer the question: what dynamics are induced by a perturbation of the Value-at-Risk and the average time spent below a barrier on the reference process?

Suggested Citation

  • Sebastian Jaimungal & Silvana M. Pesenti & Leandro S'anchez-Betancourt, 2022. "Minimal Kullback-Leibler Divergence for Constrained L\'evy-It\^o Processes," Papers 2206.14844, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2022.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2206.14844
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2206.14844
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vajda, Igor, 1990. "Distances and discrimination rates for stochastic processes," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 47-57, June.
    2. Marco Avellaneda, 1998. "Minimum-Relative-Entropy Calibration of Asset-Pricing Models," International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance (IJTAF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 1(04), pages 447-472.
    3. Yuhong Xu, 2014. "Robust valuation and risk measurement under model uncertainty," Papers 1407.8024, arXiv.org.
    4. Pesenti, Silvana M. & Millossovich, Pietro & Tsanakas, Andreas, 2019. "Reverse sensitivity testing: What does it take to break the model?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 274(2), pages 654-670.
    5. Henry Lam, 2016. "Robust Sensitivity Analysis for Stochastic Systems," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 41(4), pages 1248-1275, November.
    6. Thomas Breuer & Imre Csiszár, 2016. "Measuring Distribution Model Risk," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(2), pages 395-411, April.
    7. Paul Glasserman & Xingbo Xu, 2014. "Robust risk measurement and model risk," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(1), pages 29-58, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Penev, Spiridon & Shevchenko, Pavel V. & Wu, Wei, 2019. "The impact of model risk on dynamic portfolio selection under multi-period mean-standard-deviation criterion," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 273(2), pages 772-784.
    2. Spiridon Penev & Pavel V. Shevchenko & Wei Wu, 2021. "The impact of model risk on dynamic portfolio selection under multi-period mean-standard-deviation criterion," Papers 2108.02633, arXiv.org.
    3. Thomas Kruse & Judith C. Schneider & Nikolaus Schweizer, 2021. "A Toolkit for Robust Risk Assessment Using F -Divergences," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(10), pages 6529-6552, October.
    4. Makam, Vaishno Devi & Millossovich, Pietro & Tsanakas, Andreas, 2021. "Sensitivity analysis with χ2-divergences," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 372-383.
    5. Yu Feng & Ralph Rudd & Christopher Baker & Qaphela Mashalaba & Melusi Mavuso & Erik Schlögl, 2021. "Quantifying the Model Risk Inherent in the Calibration and Recalibration of Option Pricing Models," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-20, January.
    6. Kim, Sojung & Weber, Stefan, 2022. "Simulation methods for robust risk assessment and the distorted mix approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 298(1), pages 380-398.
    7. Roberto Baviera & Giulia Bianchi, 2019. "Model risk in mean-variance portfolio selection: an analytic solution to the worst-case approach," Papers 1902.06623, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2019.
    8. Mohammed Berkhouch & Fernanda Maria Müller & Ghizlane Lakhnati & Marcelo Brutti Righi, 2022. "Deviation-Based Model Risk Measures," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 59(2), pages 527-547, February.
    9. Roberto Baviera & Giulia Bianchi, 2021. "Model risk in mean-variance portfolio selection: an analytic solution to the worst-case approach," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 81(2), pages 469-491, October.
    10. Jose Blanchet & Karthyek Murthy, 2019. "Quantifying Distributional Model Risk via Optimal Transport," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 44(2), pages 565-600, May.
    11. Carole Bernard & Silvana M. Pesenti & Steven Vanduffel, 2022. "Robust Distortion Risk Measures," Papers 2205.08850, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2023.
    12. Cohen, Asaf & Saha, Subhamay, 2021. "Asymptotic optimality of the generalized cμ rule under model uncertainty," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 206-236.
    13. Yu Feng, 2019. "Theory and Application of Model Risk Quantification," PhD Thesis, Finance Discipline Group, UTS Business School, University of Technology, Sydney, number 3-2019.
    14. Evgeny Danilov, 2023. "Impact of Market Changes and Regulatory Measures on Accuracy of Bond Valuation in Portfolios of Russian Credit Institutions," Russian Journal of Money and Finance, Bank of Russia, vol. 82(4), pages 108-125, December.
    15. Henry Lam, 2018. "Sensitivity to Serial Dependency of Input Processes: A Robust Approach," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(3), pages 1311-1327, March.
    16. Meucci, A. & Nicolosi, M., 2016. "Dynamic portfolio management with views at multiple horizons," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 274(C), pages 495-518.
    17. Thomas Kruse & Judith C. Schneider & Nikolaus Schweizer, 2019. "Technical Note—The Joint Impact of F -Divergences and Reference Models on the Contents of Uncertainty Sets," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 67(2), pages 428-435, March.
    18. Aleksandrina Goeva & Henry Lam & Huajie Qian & Bo Zhang, 2019. "Optimization-Based Calibration of Simulation Input Models," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 67(5), pages 1362-1382, September.
    19. Valeriane Jokhadze & Wolfgang M. Schmidt, 2020. "Measuring Model Risk In Financial Risk Management And Pricing," International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance (IJTAF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 23(02), pages 1-37, April.
    20. Zhaolin Hu & L. Jeff Hong, 2022. "Robust Simulation with Likelihood-Ratio Constrained Input Uncertainty," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(4), pages 2350-2367, July.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2206.14844. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.