IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/1907.01119.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Comparative analysis of layered structures in empirical investor networks and cellphone communication networks

Author

Listed:
  • Peng Wang

    (ECUST)

  • Jun-Chao Ma

    (ECUST)

  • Zhi-Qiang Jiang

    (ECUST)

  • Wei-Xing Zhou

    (ECUST)

  • Didier Sornette

    (ETH Zurich)

Abstract

Empirical investor networks (EIN) proposed by \cite{Ozsoylev-Walden-Yavuz-Bildik-2014-RFS} are assumed to capture the information spreading path among investors. Here, we perform a comparative analysis between the EIN and the cellphone communication networks (CN) to test whether EIN is an information exchanging network from the perspective of the layer structures of ego networks. We employ two clustering algorithms ($k$-means algorithm and $H/T$ break algorithm) to detect the layer structures for each node in both networks. We find that the nodes in both networks can be clustered into two groups, one that has a layer structure similar to the theoretical Dunbar Circle corresponding to that the alters in ego networks exhibit a four-layer hierarchical structure with the cumulative number of 5, 15, 50 and 150 from the inner layer to the outer layer, and the other one having an additional inner layer with about 2 alters compared with the Dunbar Circle. We also find that the scale ratios, which are estimated based on the unique parameters in the theoretical model of layer structures \citep{Tamarit-Cuesta-Dunbar-Sanchez-2018-PNAS}, conform to a log-normal distribution for both networks. Our results not only deepen our understanding on the topological structures of EIN, but also provide empirical evidence of the channels of information diffusion among investors.

Suggested Citation

  • Peng Wang & Jun-Chao Ma & Zhi-Qiang Jiang & Wei-Xing Zhou & Didier Sornette, 2019. "Comparative analysis of layered structures in empirical investor networks and cellphone communication networks," Papers 1907.01119, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1907.01119
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/1907.01119
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stanislao Gualdi & Giulio Cimini & Kevin Primicerio & Riccardo Di Clemente & Damien Challet, 2016. "Statistically validated network of portfolio overlaps and systemic risk," Papers 1603.05914, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2016.
    2. Chester Curme & Michele Tumminello & Rosario N. Mantegna & H. Eugene Stanley & Dror Y. Kenett, 2015. "Emergence of statistically validated financial intraday lead-lag relationships," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(8), pages 1375-1386, August.
    3. Vasilis Hatzopoulos & Giulia Iori & Rosario N. Mantegna & Salvatore Miccich� & Michele Tumminello, 2015. "Quantifying preferential trading in the e-MID interbank market," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(4), pages 693-710, April.
    4. Han N. Ozsoylev & Johan Walden & M. Deniz Yavuz & Recep Bildik, 2014. "Investor Networks in the Stock Market," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 27(5), pages 1323-1366.
    5. Sandro Claudio Lera & Didier Sornette, 2019. "A theory of discrete hierarchies as optimal cost-adjusted productivity organisations," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(4), pages 1-12, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ramadiah, Amanah & Caccioli, Fabio & Fricke, Daniel, 2020. "Reconstructing and stress testing credit networks," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    2. Alessandro Ferracci & Giulio Cimini, 2021. "Systemic risk in interbank networks: disentangling balance sheets and network effects," Papers 2109.14360, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2022.
    3. Puccio, Elena & Pajala, Antti & Piilo, Jyrki & Tumminello, Michele, 2016. "Structure and evolution of a European Parliament via a network and correlation analysis," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 462(C), pages 167-185.
    4. Frank Emmert-Streib & Aliyu Musa & Kestutis Baltakys & Juho Kanniainen & Shailesh Tripathi & Olli Yli-Harja & Herbert Jodlbauer & Matthias Dehmer, 2017. "Computational Analysis of the structural properties of Economic and Financial Networks," Papers 1710.04455, arXiv.org.
    5. Caterina Liberati & Massimiliano Marzo & Paolo Zagaglia & Paola Zappa, 2015. "Drivers of demand and supply in the Euro interbank market: the role of “Key Players” during the recent turmoil," Financial Markets and Portfolio Management, Springer;Swiss Society for Financial Market Research, vol. 29(3), pages 207-250, August.
    6. Chuang, Hongwei, 2016. "Brokers’ financial network and stock return," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 172-183.
    7. Sindhuja Ranganathan & Mikko Kivelä & Juho Kanniainen, 2018. "Dynamics of investor spanning trees around dot-com bubble," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(6), pages 1-14, June.
    8. Marco Bardoscia & Paolo Barucca & Stefano Battiston & Fabio Caccioli & Giulio Cimini & Diego Garlaschelli & Fabio Saracco & Tiziano Squartini & Guido Caldarelli, 2021. "The Physics of Financial Networks," Papers 2103.05623, arXiv.org.
    9. Kk{e}stutis Baltakys & Juho Kanniainen & Frank Emmert-Streib, 2017. "Multilayer Aggregation with Statistical Validation: Application to Investor Networks," Papers 1708.09850, arXiv.org, revised May 2018.
    10. Shi, Huai-Long & Zhou, Wei-Xing, 2022. "Factor volatility spillover and its implications on factor premia," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    11. Han, Rui-Qi & Li, Ming-Xia & Chen, Wei & Zhou, Wei-Xing & Stanley, H. Eugene, 2019. "Structural properties of statistically validated empirical information networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 523(C), pages 747-756.
    12. Tinic, Murat & Sensoy, Ahmet & Demir, Muge & Nguyen, Duc Khuong, 2020. "Broker Network Connectivity and the Cross-Section of Expected Stock Returns," MPRA Paper 104719, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Kobayashi, Teruyoshi & Takaguchi, Taro, 2018. "Identifying relationship lending in the interbank market: A network approach," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 20-36.
    14. Tsang, Kwok Ping & Yang, Zichao, 2022. "Do connections pay off in the bitcoin market?," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 1-18.
    15. Liu, Qian & Li, Huajiao & Liu, Xueyong & Jiang, Meihui, 2018. "Information networks in the stock market based on the distance of the multi-attribute dimensions between listed companies," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 496(C), pages 505-513.
    16. Shanshan Jiang & Hong Fan & Min Xia, 2018. "Credit Risk Contagion Based on Asymmetric Information Association," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2018, pages 1-11, July.
    17. Chen, Shenglan & Ma, Hui & Wu, Qiang & Zhang, Hao, 2023. "Does common ownership constrain managerial rent extraction? Evidence from insider trading profitability," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    18. De Silva, Dakshina G. & Gertsberg, Marina & Kosmopoulou, Georgia & Pownall, Rachel A.J., 2022. "Evolution of a dealer trading network and its effects on art auction prices," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    19. Marc van Kralingen & Diego Garlaschelli & Karolina Scholtus & Iman van Lelyveld, 2020. "Crowded trades, market clustering, and price instability," Papers 2002.03319, arXiv.org.
    20. Carlo Campajola & Fabrizio Lillo & Daniele Tantari, 2019. "Unveiling the relation between herding and liquidity with trader lead-lag networks," Papers 1909.10807, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2020.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1907.01119. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.