IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/1906.10121.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Metaheuristics optimized feedforward neural networks for efficient stock price prediction

Author

Listed:
  • Bradley J. Pillay
  • Absalom E. Ezugwu

Abstract

The prediction of stock prices is an important task in economics, investment and making financial decisions. This has, for decades, spurred the interest of many researchers to make focused contributions to the design of accurate stock price predictive models; of which some have been utilized to predict the next day opening and closing prices of the stock indices. This paper proposes the design and implementation of a hybrid symbiotic organisms search trained feedforward neural network model for effective and accurate stock price prediction. The symbiotic organisms search algorithm is used as an efficient optimization technique to train the feedforward neural networks, while the resulting training process is used to build a better stock price prediction model. Furthermore, the study also presents a comparative performance evaluation of three different stock price forecasting models; namely, the particle swarm optimization trained feedforward neural network model, the genetic algorithm trained feedforward neural network model and the well-known ARIMA model. The system developed in support of this study utilizes sixteen stock indices as time series datasets for training and testing purpose. Three statistical evaluation measures are used to compare the results of the implemented models, namely the root mean squared error, the mean absolute percentage error and the mean absolution deviation. The computational results obtained reveal that the symbiotic organisms search trained feedforward neural network model exhibits outstanding predictive performance compared to the other models. However, the performance study shows that the three metaheuristics trained feedforward neural network models have promising predictive competence for solving problems of high dimensional nonlinear time series data, which are difficult to capture by traditional models.

Suggested Citation

  • Bradley J. Pillay & Absalom E. Ezugwu, 2019. "Metaheuristics optimized feedforward neural networks for efficient stock price prediction," Papers 1906.10121, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2020.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1906.10121
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/1906.10121
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ratnadip Adhikari & R. K. Agrawal, 2013. "Hybridization of Artificial Neural Network and Particle Swarm Optimization Methods for Time Series Forecasting," International Journal of Applied Evolutionary Computation (IJAEC), IGI Global, vol. 4(3), pages 75-90, July.
    2. Hiroshi Konno & Hiroaki Yamazaki, 1991. "Mean-Absolute Deviation Portfolio Optimization Model and Its Applications to Tokyo Stock Market," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 37(5), pages 519-531, May.
    3. Pai, Ping-Feng & Lin, Chih-Sheng, 2005. "A hybrid ARIMA and support vector machines model in stock price forecasting," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 33(6), pages 497-505, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Akhter Mohiuddin Rather & V. N. Sastry & Arun Agarwal, 2017. "Stock market prediction and Portfolio selection models: a survey," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 54(3), pages 558-579, September.
    2. Gupta, Pankaj & Mittal, Garima & Mehlawat, Mukesh Kumar, 2013. "Expected value multiobjective portfolio rebalancing model with fuzzy parameters," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(2), pages 190-203.
    3. Giovanni Bonaccolto & Massimiliano Caporin & Sandra Paterlini, 2018. "Asset allocation strategies based on penalized quantile regression," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 1-32, January.
    4. Wojtek Michalowski & Włodzimierz Ogryczak, 2001. "Extending the MAD portfolio optimization model to incorporate downside risk aversion," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 48(3), pages 185-200, April.
    5. Ogryczak, Wlodzimierz & Ruszczynski, Andrzej, 1999. "From stochastic dominance to mean-risk models: Semideviations as risk measures," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 116(1), pages 33-50, July.
    6. Kamaladdin Fataliyev & Aneesh Chivukula & Mukesh Prasad & Wei Liu, 2021. "Stock Market Analysis with Text Data: A Review," Papers 2106.12985, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2021.
    7. Najafi, Alireza & Taleghani, Rahman, 2022. "Fractional Liu uncertain differential equation and its application to finance," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 165(P2).
    8. Liu, Yong-Jun & Zhang, Wei-Guo, 2015. "A multi-period fuzzy portfolio optimization model with minimum transaction lots," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 242(3), pages 933-941.
    9. Leitner Johannes, 2005. "Optimal portfolios with expected loss constraints and shortfall risk optimal martingale measures," Statistics & Risk Modeling, De Gruyter, vol. 23(1/2005), pages 49-66, January.
    10. Massimiliano Caporin & Grégory M. Jannin & Francesco Lisi & Bertrand B. Maillet, 2014. "A Survey On The Four Families Of Performance Measures," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(5), pages 917-942, December.
    11. Dimitrios Kartsonakis Mademlis & Nikolaos Dritsakis, 2021. "Volatility Forecasting using Hybrid GARCH Neural Network Models: The Case of the Italian Stock Market," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 11(1), pages 49-60.
    12. Murat Köksalan & Ceren Tuncer Şakar, 2016. "An interactive approach to stochastic programming-based portfolio optimization," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 245(1), pages 47-66, October.
    13. Branda, Martin, 2013. "Diversification-consistent data envelopment analysis with general deviation measures," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 226(3), pages 626-635.
    14. Viet Anh Nguyen & Fan Zhang & Shanshan Wang & Jose Blanchet & Erick Delage & Yinyu Ye, 2021. "Robustifying Conditional Portfolio Decisions via Optimal Transport," Papers 2103.16451, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2024.
    15. Eduardo Correia & Rodrigo Calili & José Francisco Pessanha & Maria Fatima Almeida, 2023. "Definition of Regulatory Targets for Electricity Non-Technical Losses: Proposition of an Automatic Model-Selection Technique for Panel Data Regressions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-22, March.
    16. Milan Vaclavik & Josef Jablonsky, 2012. "Revisions of modern portfolio theory optimization model," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 20(3), pages 473-483, September.
    17. Justo Puerto & Moises Rodr'iguez-Madrena & Andrea Scozzari, 2019. "Location and portfolio selection problems: A unified framework," Papers 1907.07101, arXiv.org.
    18. Jinping Zhang & Keming Zhang, 2022. "Portfolio selection models based on interval-valued conditional value at risk (ICVaR) and empirical analysis," Papers 2201.02987, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2022.
    19. Melvin, Michael & Prins, John & Shand, Duncan, 2013. "Forecasting Exchange Rates: an Investor Perspective," Handbook of Economic Forecasting, in: G. Elliott & C. Granger & A. Timmermann (ed.), Handbook of Economic Forecasting, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 0, pages 721-750, Elsevier.
    20. Nazarian, Rafik & Gandali Alikhani, Nadiya & Naderi, Esmaeil & Amiri, Ashkan, 2013. "Forecasting Stock Market Volatility: A Forecast Combination Approach," MPRA Paper 46786, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1906.10121. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.