IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/uerser/308001.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Potential Bans of Corn and Soybean Pesticides: Economic Implications for Farmers and Consumers

Author

Listed:
  • Osteen, Craig
  • Kuchler, Fred

Abstract

Removing corn and soybean pesticides with alleged environmental and safety risks from the market could increase U.S. agricultural production costs, crop prices, farm incomes, and consumer expenditures, causing farmers to gain and consumers to lose. Banning all triazines, acetanilides, soil insecticides, or seed treatments would have the largest effects. This report uses an econometric-simulation model, incorporating relatively new developments in welfare economics, to analyze the economic implications of potential bans of corn and soybean insecticides, nematicides, fungicides, and herbicides through cost and yield assessments. Banning an individual corn or soybean pesticide would not significantly affect crop production, but banning all pesticides used for an important pest problem would have substantial effects. This study also demonstrates the interdependence among pesticide regulatory decisions.

Suggested Citation

  • Osteen, Craig & Kuchler, Fred, 1986. "Potential Bans of Corn and Soybean Pesticides: Economic Implications for Farmers and Consumers," Agricultural Economic Reports 308001, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:uerser:308001
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.308001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/308001/files/aer546.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.308001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Just, Richard E & Hueth, Darrell L, 1979. "Welfare Measures in a Multimarket Framework," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 69(5), pages 947-954, December.
    2. Hanthorn, Michael & Osteen, Craig & McDowell, Robert & Roberson, Larry, 1982. "1980 Pesticide Use on Field Corn in the Major Producing States," Staff Reports 333720, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    3. Hanthorn, Michael & Osteen, Craig & McDowell, Robert & Roberson, Larry, 1982. "1980 Pesticide Use On Field Corn In The Lake States," Staff Reports 276733, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    4. C. Robert Taylor & Klaus K. Frohberg, 1977. "The Welfare Effects of Erosion Controls, Banning Pesticides, and Limiting Fertilizer Application in the Corn Belt," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 59(1), pages 25-36.
    5. Collins, Glenn S. & Taylor, C. Robert, 1983. "TECHSIM: A Regional Field Crop and National Livestock Econometric Simulation Model," Journal of Agricultural Economics Research, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, vol. 35(2), pages 1-18, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ribaudo, Marc & Bouzaher, Aziz, 1994. "Atrazine: Environmental Characteristics and Economics of Management," Agricultural Economic Reports 34011, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    2. Cox, Craig A. & Easter, K. William, 1990. "A Regional Ban Of Alachlor And Atrazine In Southeastern Minnesota: The Economic And Environmental Effects," Staff Papers 13945, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    3. Archer, David W. & Shogren, Jason F., 1996. "Endogenous risk in weed control management," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 14(2), pages 103-122, July.
    4. Jason Vogel, 2004. "Tunnel vision: The regulation of endocrine disruptors," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 37(3), pages 277-303, December.
    5. Whittaker, Gerald W. & Lin, Biing-Hwan & Vasavada, Utpal, 1995. "Restricting Pesticide Use: The Impact On Profitability By Farm Size," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 27(2), pages 1-11, December.
    6. Batie, Sandra S. & Swinton, Scott M. & Schulz, Mary A., 1999. "Fqpa Implementation To Reduce Pesticide Residue Risks: Part I: Agricultural Producer Concerns," Staff Paper Series 11813, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics.
    7. Kuchler, Fred & McClelland, John, 1989. "Issues Raised by New Agricultural Technologies: Livestock Growth Hormones," Agricultural Economic Reports 308071, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Phillips, Mark & Hueth, Darrell L. & Just, Richard E., 1989. "Estimating Cost of Banning Agricultural Chemicals: The Case of Maneb and Maneb Alternatives," Working Papers 197631, University of Maryland, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    2. Webb, Shwu-Eng H. & Kuchler, Fred, 1984. "Models For Evaluating Economic Impacts Of Policy Changes: A Comparison," Staff Reports 276832, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    3. Kuchler, Fred & Duffy, Michael, 1984. "Control of Exotic Pests: Forecasting Economic Impacts," Agricultural Economic Reports 307964, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    4. Kilmer, Richard L. & Armbruster, Walter J., 1984. "Methods For Evaluating Economic Efficiency In Agricultural Marketing," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 16(1), pages 1-9, July.
    5. Pagoulatos, Angelos & Timmons, John F., 1977. "Alternative Scenarios Of Energy Use In U.S. Crop Production," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 9(2), pages 1-8, December.
    6. B. Rudders, David & Ward, John M., 2015. "Own-price elasticity of open access supply as a long-run measure of fish stock abundance," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 215-226.
    7. Ribaudo, Marc O. & Heimlich, Ralph & Claassen, Roger & Peters, Mark, 2001. "Least-cost management of nonpoint source pollution: source reduction versus interception strategies for controlling nitrogen loss in the Mississippi Basin," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 183-197, May.
    8. Suguiyama, Luis & Osteen, Craig, 1988. "The Economic Importance of Cotton Insects and Mites," Agricultural Economic Reports 308062, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    9. Carter, Colin A. & Hueth, Darrell L. & Mamer, John W. & Schmitz, Andrew, 1981. "Labor Strikes And The Price Of Lettuce," Western Journal of Agricultural Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 6(1), pages 1-14, July.
    10. Tolhurst, Tor N. & DeMars, Christopher & Klonsky, Karen & Goodhue, Rachael E. & Zhang, Minghua, 2017. "Are Farmers Good Neighbors? Self-Regulation of Pesticide Applications near Schools and Daycares in California," 2017 Annual Meeting, July 30-August 1, Chicago, Illinois 258393, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    11. Walter N. Thurman, 1993. "The Welfare Significance and Nonsignificance of General Equilibrium Demand and Supply Curves," Public Finance Review, , vol. 21(4), pages 449-469, October.
    12. Park, William M. & Sawyer, David G., 1987. "Cost Effectiveness Of Alternative Subsidy Strategies For Soil Erosion Control," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 19(2), pages 1-12, December.
    13. Carriker, Gordon L., 1993. "Factor Input Demand Subject to Economic and Environmental Risk: The Case of Nitrogen Fertilizer in Corn Production," Staff Papers 118154, Kansas State University, Department of Agricultural Economics.
    14. Whittaker, Gerald W. & Lin, Biing-Hwan & Vasavada, Utpal, 1995. "Restricting Pesticide Use: The Impact On Profitability By Farm Size," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 27(2), pages 1-11, December.
    15. Lakshminarayan, P. G., 1993. "Tradeoffs in balancing multiple objectives of an integrated agricultural economic and environmental system," ISU General Staff Papers 1993010108000011833, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    16. Charles B. Moss & Andrew Schmitz, 2001. "Vertical integration and trade policy: The case of sugar," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 18(1), pages 49-60.
    17. Kerestes, Daniel E. & Easter, K. William, 1981. "A Review And An Annotated Bibliography Of Studies Of Soil Conservation Programs, Practices And Strategies," Staff Papers 13988, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    18. Burness, H. Stuart & Brill, Thomas C., 2001. "The role for policy in common pool groundwater use," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 19-40, January.
    19. Cox, Craig A. & Easter, K. William, 1990. "A Regional Ban Of Alachlor And Atrazine In Southeastern Minnesota: The Economic And Environmental Effects," Staff Papers 13945, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    20. Archer, David Walter, 1995. "Self-insurance and self-protection in weed control: implications for nonpoint source pollution," ISU General Staff Papers 1995010108000012033, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:uerser:308001. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ersgvus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.