Counter-Cyclical Farm Safety Nets
Since the 1920's, the federal government has used an array of farm programs to provide a “safety net” for American agriculture. Farm programs have used price supports, disaster payments, income supports, direct payments, and supply management to provide a safety net for particular markets and producers. This array of farm programs has rarely been organized or managed with the sole purpose of providing a minimum income level to farmers. With the exception of set aside programs, the programs have provided incentives for production and the diversification of production through out the continental United States. While the FAIR Act of 1996 has been generously applauded for allowing producers planting flexibility, maintaining export competitiveness through marketing loan programs, and maintaining production, the Act has been criticized for its lack of a sufficient safety net. All crop insurance programs and marketing loan provisions may be considered safety nets. However, the ad hoc passage of emergency relief in each of the last three years 1998-2000 suggests that these programs have not provided sufficient support to program crop agriculture. The safety net issue, therefore, will likely be a major source of debate in crafting the next farm bill. Can the U.S. government reduce the liquidity problem facing major crop agriculture while pressing the popular provisions of the FAIR Act? Developing a whole farm safety net proposal is one alternative being studied.
|Date of creation:||Feb 2001|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: 450 Blocker Building, 2124 TAMU, College Station, TX 77843-2124|
Phone: (979) 845-5913
Fax: (979) 845-3140
Web page: http://www.afpc.tamu.edu/
More information through EDIRC
References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- repec:ags:joaaec:v:33:y:2001:i:2:p:261-270 is not listed on IDEAS
- Adams, Gary M. & Richardson, James W., 2001.
"Exploring Options For A New Farm Bill,"
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics,
Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 33(02), August.
- Chad E. Hart & Bruce A. Babcock, 2000. "Counter-Cyclical Agricultural Program Payments: Is It Time to Look at Revenue?," Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) Publications 99-bp28, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.
- Adams, Gary M. & Richardson, James W., 2001. "Exploring Options for a New Farm Bill," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 33(02), pages 261-270, August.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:tamfip:42779. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (AgEcon Search)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.