IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/pugtwp/332947.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Applying Meta modeling for extended CGE-modeling: Sample techniques and potential application

Author

Listed:
  • Jin, Ding
  • Hedtrich, Johannes
  • Henning, Christian

Abstract

CGE-applications are workhorse models in applied economic policy analysis, i.e. the development economic literature or modeling climate and energy policies. However, beyond its prominent application CGE-model approaches are also heavily criticized. On the one hand, while the general equilibrium model has the advantages in terms of internal consistency and allowing for clearer identification of causality, the application of a CGE model requires simplifying assumptions that are open to challenge. Moreover, empirical results derived from the CGE-model application are very sensitive to specific model specifications, that are often only weakly empirically justified, e.g. assumed closure rules and assumed elasticity parameters. Thus, many results, e.g. growth-poverty linkages, that are derived from a CGE model are in fact plagued by high model uncertainty implying a limited potential to generate robust policy-relevant messages. To overcome theoretical shortcomings of ad hoc CGE-approaches we suggest a combined approach incorporating econometric approaches to assess policy-growth linkages that are integrated into the CGE-approach modeling growth-poverty linkages. However, estimation of integrated econometric and CGE-modeling approaches are often tedious.Finally, CGE-model approaches are often applied to provide scientific expertise to advise the government in political practice. Hence, it would be necessary to incorporate general equilibrium models into overall decision-making models. However, given the size and complexity of CGE-models integration of these approaches into an overall decision-making modeling approach is rather difficult and often numerically not tractable. Therefore, in the context of such a situation, we suggest application of meta-modeling as a potential solution of the application problems of standard CGE-models in advanced policy modeling frameworks and we are motivated to begin with tackling the problem of elasticity parameters and closure rules.

Suggested Citation

  • Jin, Ding & Hedtrich, Johannes & Henning, Christian, 2018. "Applying Meta modeling for extended CGE-modeling: Sample techniques and potential application," Conference papers 332947, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:pugtwp:332947
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/332947/files/8903.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Francois Bourguignon & Luiz A. Pereira da Silva, 2003. "The Impact of Economic Policies on Poverty and Income Distribution : Evaluation Techniques and Tools," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 15090.
    2. Kleijnen, Jack P. C. & Standridge, Charles R., 1988. "Experimental design and regression analysis in simulation: An FMS case study," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 257-261, February.
    3. Jack P. C. Kleijnen, 1975. "A Comment on Blanning's “Metamodel for Sensitivity Analysis: The Regression Metamodel in Simulation”," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 5(3), pages 21-23, May.
    4. Hazledine, Tim, 1992. "A Critique of Computable General Equilibrium Models for Trade Policy Analysis," Working Papers 51131, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium.
    5. Fan, Shenggen, 2008. "Public expenditures, growth, and poverty in developing countries: Lessons from developing countries," Issue briefs 51, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    6. Robert W. Blanning, 1974. "The Sources and Uses of Sensitivity Information," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 4(4), pages 32-38, August.
    7. Fan, Shenggen (ed.), 2008. "Public expenditures, growth, and poverty: Lessons from developing countries," IFPRI books, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), number 978-0-8018-8859-5.
    8. Jack P. C. Kleijnen & Susan M. Sanchez & Thomas W. Lucas & Thomas M. Cioppa, 2005. "State-of-the-Art Review: A User’s Guide to the Brave New World of Designing Simulation Experiments," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 17(3), pages 263-289, August.
    9. Chunhua Wang, 2007. "A dynamic stochastic frontier production model with time-varying efficiency: comment," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(6), pages 415-417.
    10. Kleijnen, Jack P. C. & Sargent, Robert G., 2000. "A methodology for fitting and validating metamodels in simulation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 120(1), pages 14-29, January.
    11. Vonk Noordegraaf, Antonie & Nielen, Mirjam & Kleijnen, Jack P. C., 2003. "Sensitivity analysis by experimental design and metamodelling: Case study on simulation in national animal disease control," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 146(3), pages 433-443, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jin, Ding & Hedtrich, Johannes & Henning, Christian H. C. A., 2018. "Applying meta-modeling for extended CGE-modeling: Sampling techniques and potential application," Working Papers of Agricultural Policy WP2018-03, University of Kiel, Department of Agricultural Economics, Chair of Agricultural Policy.
    2. Kleijnen, J.P.C., 2006. "Regression Models and Experimental Designs : A Tutorial for Simulation Analaysts," Other publications TiSEM 7b8ecddb-f49e-4b80-865b-a, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    3. Kleijnen, J.P.C., 1997. "Experimental Design for Sensitivity Analysis, Optimization and Validation of Simulation Models," Discussion Paper 1997-52, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    4. Fernández, Antonio Turrent & Wise, Timothy A. & Garvey, Elise, 2012. "Achieving Mexico’s Maize Potential," Working Papers 179101, Tufts University, Global Development and Environment Institute.
    5. Johannes Ziesmer, 2024. "Identifying key sectors of sustainable development: A Bayesian framework estimating policy‐impacts in a general equilibrium," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 40(2), pages 458-483, April.
    6. Shenggen Fan, 2020. "Reflections of Food Policy Evolution over the Last Three Decades," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 42(3), pages 380-394, September.
    7. Xuefei Lu & Alessandro Rudi & Emanuele Borgonovo & Lorenzo Rosasco, 2020. "Faster Kriging: Facing High-Dimensional Simulators," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 68(1), pages 233-249, January.
    8. Darius Tirtosuharto, 2022. "The impact of fiscal efficiency on poverty reduction in Indonesia: institutional factor and geographical differences," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 67-93, January.
    9. Dorosh, Paul & Thurlow, James, 2014. "Can Cities or Towns Drive African Development? Economywide Analysis for Ethiopia and Uganda," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 113-123.
    10. Ousmane Badiane & Tsitsi Makombe, 2014. "The Theory and Practice of Agriculture, Growth, and Development in Africa," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2014-061, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    11. Raghav Gaiha & Katsushi S. Imai & Ganesh Thapa & Woojin Kang, 2009. "Fiscal Stimulus, Agricultural Growth and Poverty in Asia and the Pacific Region: Evidence from Panel Data," Economics Discussion Paper Series 0919, Economics, The University of Manchester.
    12. Rob Vos, 2018. "Agricultural and rural transformations in Asian development," WIDER Working Paper Series 87, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    13. Charles B. Moss & Alexandre Lyambabaje & James F. Oehmke, 2017. "An economic evaluation of SPREAD on Rwanda’s rural population," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(36), pages 3634-3644, August.
    14. Richard Anson & Tewodaj Mogues, 2016. "A Systematic Review of Cross-Country Data Initiatives on Agricultural Public Expenditures in Developing Countries," Working Papers id:11105, eSocialSciences.
    15. Apata Temidayo Gabriel, 2019. "Public spending mechanisms and gross domestic product (GDP) growth in the agricultural sector (1970–2016): Lessons for Nigeria from agricultural policy progressions in China," Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series, Sciendo, vol. 44(44), pages 57-72, June.
    16. Jack P. C. Kleijnen & Susan M. Sanchez & Thomas W. Lucas & Thomas M. Cioppa, 2005. "State-of-the-Art Review: A User’s Guide to the Brave New World of Designing Simulation Experiments," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 17(3), pages 263-289, August.
    17. Jin, Ding & Thube, Sneha Dattatraya & Hedtrich, Johannes & Henning, Christian & Delzeit, Ruth, 2019. "A Baseline Calibration Procedure for CGE models: An Application for DART," Conference papers 333057, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    18. Waeyenberge, Elisa Van. & Bargawi, Hannah., 2011. "Macroeconomic policy for "full and productive employment and decent work for all" : Uganda country study," ILO Working Papers 994658733402676, International Labour Organization.
    19. Durieux, Severine & Pierreval, Henri, 2004. "Regression metamodeling for the design of automated manufacturing system composed of parallel machines sharing a material handling resource," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 89(1), pages 21-30, May.
    20. Bathla, S. & Kumar, A. & Joshi, P.K., 2018. "Regional income inequalities and public investments in rural India," Agricultural Economics Research Review, Agricultural Economics Research Association (India), vol. 31(1).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Research Methods/ Statistical Methods;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:pugtwp:332947. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gtpurus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.