IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/pugtwp/331084.html

The Role of Innovation and Opportunity in Bilateral OECD Trade Performance

Author

Listed:
  • Sanyal, Prabuddha

Abstract

This paper investigates the specialization pattern of countries in terms of technology and exports and examines the role of innovation intensity and technological opportunity in determining bilateral trade at the aggregate and sectoral level. Some of the major ndings are as follows: At the aggregate level, innovation intensity and technological opportunity has positive and signi cant impact on bilateral trade performance especially during the 1990s. At the sectoral level, innovation intensity a ects bilateral trade performance positively mainly in the high-technology sectors. There is also a positive and signi cant relationship between technological opportunity and bilateral trade for ve out of the eighteen sectors, which are the high-technology sectors. An indirect policy implication is that creation of a national innovation system is extremely desirable for economies that are trying to specialize in the high-technology sectors.

Suggested Citation

  • Sanyal, Prabuddha, 2003. "The Role of Innovation and Opportunity in Bilateral OECD Trade Performance," Conference papers 331084, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:pugtwp:331084
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/331084/files/1092.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John E. Floyd, 1965. "The Effects of Farm Price Supports on the Returns to Land and Labor in Agriculture," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 73(2), pages 148-148.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Paul Feichtinger & Klaus Salhofer, 2016. "The Fischler Reform of the Common Agricultural Policy and Agricultural Land Prices," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 92(3), pages 411-432.
    2. Keqiang Wang & Jianglin Lu & Hongmei Liu & Xin Fan & Lina Zhang & Silu Zhang, 2023. "A Study on Accounting for Suburban Agricultural Land Rent in a Chinese Context Based on Agricultural Ecological Value and Landscape Value," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-22, December.
    3. O'Donoghue, Cathal & Lopez, Jeremey & O’Neill, Stephen & Ryan, Mary, 2015. "AHedonic Price Model of Self-Assessed Agricultural Land Values," 150th Seminar, October 22-23, 2015, Edinburgh, Scotland 212639, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    4. John Garvey & Gordon Sirr & Deirdre O'Shea & Fergal O'Brien, 2019. "Risk and Planning in Agriculture: How Planning on Dairy Farms in Ireland Is Affected by Farmers’ Regulatory Focus," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(7), pages 1491-1502, July.
    5. Jan Pokrivčák & Marián Tóth & Pavel Ciaian & Martin Bušík & Andrej Svorenčík, 2020. "Why Cannot Direct Payments Be Capped in Slovakia? A Political Economy Perspective," Prague Economic Papers, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2020(6), pages 625-648.
    6. Dimaranan, Betina V. & Hertel, Thomas W. & Keeney, Roman, 2003. "OECD Domestic Support and the Developing Countries," 2003 Annual meeting, July 27-30, Montreal, Canada 22000, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    7. Wensheng Lin & Rongyuan Chen, 2021. "The Capitalization Effect and Its Consequence of Agricultural Support Policies—Based on the Evidence of 800 Villages in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-13, July.
    8. Gardner, Bruce L., 2002. "U.S. Commodity Policies And Land Prices," Working Papers 28560, University of Maryland, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    9. Lopes, Mauro de Rezende & Schuh, G. Edward, 1981. "The Mobilization of Resources from Agriculture: A Policy Analysis for Brazil," 1981 Occasional Paper Series No. 2 197130, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    10. Livia Marchetti & Valentina Cattivelli & Claudia Cocozza & Fabio Salbitano & Marco Marchetti, 2020. "Beyond Sustainability in Food Systems: Perspectives from Agroecology and Social Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-24, September.
    11. Paul Feichtinger & Klaus Salhofer, 2016. "Decoupled Single Farm Payments of the CAP and Land Rental Prices," Working Papers 652016, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Department of Economics and Social Sciences, Institute for Sustainable Economic Development.
    12. Ciaian, Pavel & Kancs, d'Artis, 2011. "Food, energy and environment: Is bioenergy the missing link?," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 571-580, October.
    13. Short, Cameron, 2002. "A Methodology to Evaluate the Impact of Cost Recovery in Canadian Agriculture and Agri-Food Chains," Economic and Market Information 54496, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada.
    14. Yu, Jisang & Villoria, Nelson B. & Hendricks, Nathan P., 2022. "The incidence of foreign market tariffs on farmland rental rates," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    15. Callahan, Scott & Ifft, Jennifer & Michaud, Clayton P., 2022. "The impact of countercyclical farm programs on agricultural land values," 2022 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Anaheim, California 322579, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    16. Paul Allanson, 2005. "The Impact of Farm Income Support on Absolute Inequality," Dundee Discussion Papers in Economics 178, Economic Studies, University of Dundee.
    17. Marten Graubner, 2018. "Lost in space? The effect of direct payments on land rental prices," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 45(2), pages 143-171.
    18. David Colman, 2004. "Compte rendu d'ouvrage - Exploring the frontiers of agricultural economics : a review of volumes 2A and 2B of the Handbook of Agricultural Economics," Cahiers d'Economie et Sociologie Rurales, INRA Department of Economics, vol. 73, pages 126-141.
    19. Shoemaker, Robbin, "undated". "The Conservation Reserve Program, Land Values, and Asymmetric Information," 1988 Annual Meeting, August 1-3, Knoxville, Tennessee 270152, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    20. Claassen, Roger & Gardner, Bruce L., 1994. "Implications for U.S. Farm Labor and Land Markets of the Free Trade Agreement with Mexico," Working Papers 197798, University of Maryland, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:pugtwp:331084. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gtpurus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.