IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/huaedp/289994.html

Allocative and Technical Efficiency of Corporate Farms in Russia

Author

Listed:
  • Grazhdaninova, Margarita
  • Lerman, Zvi

Abstract

This study is aimed to analyze Russian corporate farms technical efficiency using DEA and allocative efficiency basing upon VMP calculations. The estimations are carried out on three aggregation levels: total farm, sectors (livestock and crops production) and selected commodities (grain, sunflower, beef, milk and pork), using survey data. The results of analyses suggest that there is no substantial misallocation of resources given current input and output prices. High technical efficiency scores speak for production technologies being homogeneous and mean that simple extension of "best practice" production will not eliminate the large productivity gap between Russia and the developed market economies.
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)

Suggested Citation

  • Grazhdaninova, Margarita & Lerman, Zvi, 2004. "Allocative and Technical Efficiency of Corporate Farms in Russia," Discussion Papers 289994, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Department of Agricultural Economics and Management.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:huaedp:289994
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.289994
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/289994/files/lerman-corporate.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.289994?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Kamel Helali & Maha Kalai, 2015. "Technical Efficiency Determinants Of The Tunisian Manufacturing Industry: Stochastic Production Frontiers Estimates On Panel Data," Journal of Economic Development, Chung-Ang Unviersity, Department of Economics, vol. 40(2), pages 105-130, June.
    3. Badunenko, Oleg & Fritsch, Michael & Stephan, Andreas, 2008. "Allocative efficiency measurement revisited--Do we really need input prices?," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 25(5), pages 1093-1109, September.
    4. Hamsa, K.R. & Umesh, K.B., 2021. "Technical Efficiency in Finger Millet and Paddy Crop in Southern Karnataka: Application of Data Envelop Analysis and Stochastic Frontier Approach," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 315862, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    5. Gardner, Bruce L. & Lerman, Zvi, 2006. "Agricultural Cooperative Enterprise in the Transition from Socialist Collective Farming," Journal of Rural Cooperation, Hebrew University, Center for Agricultural Economic Research, vol. 34(01), pages 1-18.
    6. Sarris, Alexander H. & Savastano, Sara & Christiaensen, Luc J.M., 2006. "The Role of Agriculture in Reducing Poverty in Tanzania: A Household Perspective from Rural Kilimanjaro and Ruvuma," 2006 Annual Meeting, August 12-18, 2006, Queensland, Australia 25573, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    7. C. A. Afolami & Abiodun Obayelu & M. U. Agbonlahor & O.A Lawal-Adebowale, 2012. "Socioeconomic Analysis of Rice Farmers and Effects of Group Formation on Rice Production in Ekiti and Ogun States of South-West Nigeria," Journal of Agricultural Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 4(4), pages 233-233, February.
    8. Zhu, Xueqin & Demeter, Robert Milan & Oude Lansink, Alfons G.J.M., 2008. "Competitiveness of dairy farms in three countries: the role of CAP subsidies," 2008 International Congress, August 26-29, 2008, Ghent, Belgium 44143, European Association of Agricultural Economists.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:huaedp:289994. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/agrhuil.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.