IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/cudarb/122110.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Business Summary New York State 2002

Author

Listed:
  • Knoblauch, Wayne A.
  • Putnam, Linda D.
  • Karszes, Jason

Abstract

Business and financial records for 2002 from 219 New York dairy farm businesses are summarized and analyzed. This analysis demonstrates the use of cash accounting with accrual adjustments to measure farm profitability, financial performance, and costs of producing milk. Traditional methods of analyzing dairy farm businesses are combined with evaluation techniques that show the relationship between good management performance and financial success. The farms in the project averaged 297 cows per farm and 22,312 pounds of milk sold per cow, which represent above average size and management level for New York dairy farms. Net farm income excluding appreciation, which is the return to the operator's labor, management, capital, and other unpaid family labor, averaged $38,185 per farm. The rate of return to all capital invested in the farm business including appreciation averaged 2.9 percent. Differences in profitability between farms continue to widen. Average net farm income excluding appreciation of the top 10 percent of farms was $311,300, while the lowest 10 percent was a negative $173,275. Rates of return on equity with appreciation ranged from 64 percent to negative 37 percent for the highest 10 percent and the lowest 10 percent of farms, respectively. In 2002, farms supplementing the herd with bovine somatotropin (bST) attained higher rates of milk production per cow, had larger herds and were more profitable than farms not supplementing with bST for all measures other than labor and management income per operator. Farms adopting rotational grazing generally produced less milk per cow than non-grazing farms but had somewhat lower costs of production and higher profitability. Large freestall farms averaged the highest milk output per cow and per worker, the lowest total cost of production and investment per cow, and the greatest returns to labor, management and capital. Farms milking three times a day (3X) were larger, produced more milk per cow and had higher net incomes than herds milking two times per day (2X). Operating costs per hundredweight of milk were $0.22 per hundredweight higher for 3X than 2X milking herds, while output per cow was 3,768 pounds higher. One should not conclude that adoption of these technologies alone were responsible for differences in performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Knoblauch, Wayne A. & Putnam, Linda D. & Karszes, Jason, 2003. "Business Summary New York State 2002," Research Bulletins 122110, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:cudarb:122110
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://purl.umn.edu/122110
    Download Restriction: no

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hung-Hao, Chang & Boisvert, Richard N. & Tauer, Loren W., 2008. "Explaining Changes in the Distribution of Annual Dairy Farm Income over Time," 2008 Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2008, Orlando, Florida 6544, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    BUSINESS ANALYSIS; DAIRY MANAGEMENT; FARM BUSINESS SUMMARY; NEW YORK FARMS; Livestock Production/Industries; Q12; Q14;

    JEL classification:

    • Q12 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Micro Analysis of Farm Firms, Farm Households, and Farm Input Markets
    • Q14 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Agricultural Finance

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:cudarb:122110. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (AgEcon Search). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/dacorus.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.