IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aare99/123789.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Economic Issues in Assessing Research Priorities in Feed Grains Nutrition

Author

Listed:
  • Brennan, John P.
  • Singh, Rajinder Pal
  • Singh, Inder Pal

Abstract

Researchers have abundant technical opportunities to select various options for improvement of nutritional characteristics of feed grains. Choosing between those opportunities is a difficult issue for research funding organisations. In this paper, an attempt to address those research resource allocation issues is reported. The approach to use in analysing improvements in the feed quality of grains is discussed. By defining the problem as a cost reduction for the livestock industries, the impact of improvements in grain nutrition can be defined by their impact on the least-cost feed rations for different livestock categories. Using that approach, the benefits of improved feeds can be evaluated, and research priorities can be determined on the basis of which have the greatest overall benefits across the livestock sector. On the basis of this preliminary analysis, conclusions are drawn as to the likely direction for future research in these areas.

Suggested Citation

  • Brennan, John P. & Singh, Rajinder Pal & Singh, Inder Pal, 1999. "Economic Issues in Assessing Research Priorities in Feed Grains Nutrition," 1999 Conference (43th), January 20-22, 1999, Christchurch, New Zealand 123789, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:aare99:123789
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.123789
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/123789/files/BrennanSingh.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.123789?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thomas J. Voon & Geoff W. Edwards, 1992. "Research Payoff from Quality Improvement: The Case of Protein in Australian Wheat," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 74(3), pages 564-572.
    2. Roger N. Rose, 1980. "Supply Shifts and Research Benefits: Comment," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 62(4), pages 834-837.
    3. Hill, Debbie J. & Piggott, Roley R. & Griffith, Garry R., 1996. "Profitability Of Incremental Expenditure On Fibre Promotion," Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 40(3), pages 1-24, December.
    4. D.J. Hill & Roley R. Piggott & Garry R. Griffith, 1996. "Profitability Of Incremental Expenditure On Fibre Promotion," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 40(3), pages 151-174, December.
    5. Roley R. Piggott & Nicholas E. Piggott & Vic E. Wright, 1995. "Approximating Farm-Level Returns to Incremental Advertising Expenditure: Methods and an Application to the Australian Meat Industry," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 77(3), pages 497-511.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Brennan, John P. & Singh, Rajinder Pal, 2000. "Economic Assessment of Improving Nutritional Characteristics of Feed Grains," Research Reports 28000, New South Wales Department of Primary Industries Research Economists.
    2. Zhao, Xueyan & Mullen, John D. & Griffith, Garry R. & Griffiths, William E. & Piggott, Roley R., 2000. "An Equilibrium Displacement Model of the Australian Beef Industry," Research Reports 28007, New South Wales Department of Primary Industries Research Economists.
    3. Hill, Debbie J. & Piggott, Roley R. & Griffith, Garry R., 1999. "Profitability Of Incremental Generic Promotion Expenditure By Australian Dairy Farmers," Working Papers 12913, University of New England, School of Economics.
    4. Zhao, Xueyan & Mullen, John D. & Griffith, Garry R., 2005. "Economic Surplus Measurement in Multi-Market Models," Working Papers 12910, University of New England, School of Economics.
    5. Hill, D. J. & Piggott, R. R. & Griffith, G. R., 2001. "Profitability of incremental generic promotion of Australian dairy products," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 26(3), pages 253-266, December.
    6. Dent, Siobahn K. & Piggott, Roley R. & O'Donnell, Christopher J. & Griffith, Garry R., 2003. "Does Excluding Cross-commodity Interactions Matter? Beef and Lamb in Australia," 2003 Conference (47th), February 12-14, 2003, Fremantle, Australia 57859, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    7. Vere, David T. & Jones, Randall E. & Dowling, Peter, 2004. "An Economic Evaluation of Research into the Improved Management of the Annual Grass Weed Vulpia in Temperate Pastures in South-Eastern Australia," Research Reports 42503, New South Wales Department of Primary Industries Research Economists.
    8. Benjamin Henderson & Lynn Henry & Gordon MacAulay & Jen Tatuh, 2010. "Potential Payoff from R&D in the Coconut Industry of North Sulawesi, Indonesia," Asian Economic Journal, East Asian Economic Association, vol. 24(1), pages 69-85, March.
    9. Hoque, Ziaul & Farquharson, Robert J. & Taylor, Ian & Walker, Steve & Osten, Vikki & Jones, Randall E., 2003. "The economic cost of weeds in dryland cotton production systems of Australia," 2003 Conference (47th), February 12-14, 2003, Fremantle, Australia 57893, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    10. David T. Vere & Randall E. Jones & Garry R. Griffith, 2003. "Economic benefits of public investment in weed management: the case of vulpia in south‐eastern Australia's temperate pasture areas," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 47(4), pages 519-539, December.
    11. Pannell, D. J., 1999. "On the estimation of on-farm benefits of agricultural research," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 61(2), pages 123-134, August.
    12. Vere, D. T. & Jones, R. E. & Saunders, Glen, 2004. "The economic benefits of rabbit control in Australian temperate pastures by the introduction of rabbit haemorrhagic disease," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 30(2), pages 143-155, March.
    13. Holloway, Garth J. & Peyton, L. James & Griffith, Garry R., 2000. "Was the Australian Meat and Live-stock Corporation's advertising efficient?," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 44(1), pages 1-27.
    14. Kim, Yun-Shik & Sumner, Daniel A., 2005. "Measuring Research Benefits With Import Ban Restrictions, Quality Changes, Non-Market Influences On Adoption And Food Security Incentives," 2005 Annual meeting, July 24-27, Providence, RI 19148, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    15. Edwards, Geoff W. & Freebairn, John W., 1982. "The Social Benefits from an Increase in Productivity in a Part of an Industry," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 50(02), pages 1-18, August.
    16. Balagtas, Joseph Valdes & Kim, Sounghun, 2005. "Beggar-Thy-Self Advertising: A Multi-Market Model of Generic Promotion for Dairy Products," 2005 Annual meeting, July 24-27, Providence, RI 19303, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    17. Cooke, Stephen C., 1990. "The Role Of Value Added In Benefit/Cost Analysis," A.E. Research Series 140522, University of Idaho, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology.
    18. Henry Kinnucan & Øystein Myrland, 2008. "On generic vs. brand promotion of farm products in foreign markets," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(6), pages 673-684.
    19. Salayo, Nerissa D., 2000. "Investment Opportunities for the Shrimp Processing Industry in the Philippines: Results from a Hedonic Analysis," Discussion Papers DP 2000-12, Philippine Institute for Development Studies.
    20. Collins, D. & Poulter, David, 1990. "Estimation of Welfare Gains from the Parasite Control Program 'Wormkill'," 1990 Conference (34th), February 13-15, 1990, Brisbane, Australia 144925, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Crop Production/Industries;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aare99:123789. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaresea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.