Rice mountain Assessment of the Thai rice pledging program
Author
Abstract
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)
Suggested Citation
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.165882
Download full text from publisher
Other versions of this item:
- Risti Permani & David Vanzetti, 2016. "Rice mountain: assessment of the Thai rice pledging program," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 47(3), pages 273-284, May.
- Permani, Risti & Vanzetti, David, 2014. "Rice Mountain Assessment of the Thai rice pledging program," 2014 Conference (58th), February 4-7, 2014, Port Macquarie, Australia 165881, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
Citations
Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Nuntana Udomkit & Pornthip Yungvisessuk & Claus Schreier, 2021. "Effects of Paddy Price Intervention on the Rice Mill Business: A Case Study of the Paddy Pledging Programme in Thailand," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 22(6), pages 1362-1374, December.
- Song, Xiaoqing & Wang, Xiong & Li, Xinyi & Zhang, Weina & Scheffran, Jürgen, 2021. "Policy-oriented versus market-induced: Factors influencing crop diversity across China," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
- Mohammad Hasan Mobarok & Wyatt Thompson & Theodoros Skevas, 2021. "COVID-19 and Policy Impacts on the Bangladesh Rice Market and Food Security," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-18, May.
- Kaittisak Kumse & Nobuhiro Suzuki & Takeshi Sato, 2020. "Does oligopsony power matter in price support policy design? Empirical evidence from the Thai Jasmine rice market," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 51(3), pages 373-385, May.
- Hoang, Hoa T.K. & Thompson, Wyatt & Kwon, Sanguk, 2021. "Low-Income Household Food Consumption Consequences of Rice Policy and Pandemic Impacts on Income and Price in Thailand," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 52(2), July.
More about this item
Keywords
; ; ; ;NEP fields
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:- NEP-AGR-2014-05-24 (Agricultural Economics)
Statistics
Access and download statisticsCorrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aare14:165882. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaresea.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.
Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aare14/165882.html