IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aaea13/149831.html

Does E-Commerce Help Farmers’ Markets? Measuring the Impact of MarketMaker

Author

Listed:
  • Isengildina-Massa, Olga
  • Zapata, Samuel D.
  • Carpio, Carlos E.
  • Lamie, R. David

Abstract

MarketMaker is one of the most extensive collections of electronic searchable food industry related data engines in the country with over 17,500 profiles of food related enterprises, including more than 7,600 agricultural producers and 1,295 farmers markets. This study examined the impact of MarketMaker on participating farmers’ markets. Our findings indicate that about half of the farmers markets have experienced benefits from their participation in the form of new contacts, new customers and vendors, and increase in sales. Through the analysis of factors that affect the increase in farmers’ markets sales due to MarketMaker we identified that the components needed for the more successful use of MarketMaker include an established MarketMaker program, an established farmers’ market and an active user-manager.
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)

Suggested Citation

  • Isengildina-Massa, Olga & Zapata, Samuel D. & Carpio, Carlos E. & Lamie, R. David, 2013. "Does E-Commerce Help Farmers’ Markets? Measuring the Impact of MarketMaker," 2013 Annual Meeting, August 4-6, 2013, Washington, D.C. 149831, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:aaea13:149831
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.149831
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/149831/files/Combined.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.149831?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Ying Song & Lu Li & Stavros Sindakis & Sakshi Aggarwal & Charles Chen & Saloome Showkat, 2024. "RETRACTED ARTICLE: Examining E-Commerce Adoption in Farmer Entrepreneurship and the Role of Social Networks: Data from China," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(2), pages 8290-8326, June.
    3. Aashish Argade & Arnab Kumar Laha & Anand Kumar Jaiswal, 2022. "Electronic marketplaces under conditions of oligopsony and relational marketing – an empirical exploration of electronic agricultural markets in India," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(3), pages 1541-1554, September.
    4. Kewei Gao & Guanghua Qiao, 2025. "How Social Capital Drives Farmers’ Multi-Stage E-Commerce Participation: Evidence from Inner Mongolia, China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-22, February.
    5. Grzegorz Szymanski & Robert Stanislawski, 2018. "Research Online - Purchase Offline - A Phenomenon Among The Young Generation In The E-Commerce Sector," Economy & Business Journal, International Scientific Publications, Bulgaria, vol. 12(1), pages 185-192.
    6. Jean D. Gumirakiza & Mara E. Schroering, 2024. "Do Online Shoppers Attend Farmers’ Markets?," Journal of Agricultural Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(10), pages 1-39, April.
    7. Dawn Thilmany & Elizabeth Canales & Sarah A. Low & Kathryn Boys, 2021. "Local Food Supply Chain Dynamics and Resilience during COVID‐19," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 43(1), pages 86-104, March.
    8. Xiaojing Li & Apurbo Sarkar & Xianli Xia & Waqar Hussain Memon, 2021. "Village Environment, Capital Endowment, and Farmers’ Participation in E-Commerce Sales Behavior: A Demand Observable Bivariate Probit Model Approach," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-20, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaea13:149831. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.