IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/adl/wpaper/1991-05.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Impact of a Cost Minimisation User Cost Model on Public Transport Subsidy

Author

Listed:
  • Peter Tisato

    (Department of Economics, University of Adelaide)

Abstract

We show that optimal public transport subsidy is sensitive to the use of alternative user cost models, and that a model based on cost minimisation principles may lead to an improvement in subsidy estimates. For the case of homogeneous consumers and non-peaked demand, the cost minimisation user cost model yields optimal subsidy estimates which differ by up to 55% from those generated by existing'models. Multiple optimal subsidy equilibria may also exist arising from a kink in the user cost schedule at a critical frequency and a resulting discontinuity in the marginal benefit of frequency enhancement schedule

Suggested Citation

  • Peter Tisato, 1991. "Impact of a Cost Minimisation User Cost Model on Public Transport Subsidy," School of Economics and Public Policy Working Papers 1991-05, University of Adelaide, School of Economics and Public Policy.
  • Handle: RePEc:adl:wpaper:1991-05
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://media.adelaide.edu.au/economics/papers/doc/wp1991-05.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. de Palma, André & Lindsey, Robin, 2001. "Optimal timetables for public transportation," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 35(8), pages 789-813, September.
    2. Tisato, Peter, 1998. "Service unreliability and bus subsidy," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 32(6), pages 423-436, August.
    3. Fosgerau, Mogens, 2009. "The marginal social cost of headway for a scheduled service," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 43(8-9), pages 813-820, September.
    4. Zhang, Junlin & Lindsey, Robin & Yang, Hai, 2018. "Public transit service frequency and fares with heterogeneous users under monopoly and alternative regulatory policies," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 117(PA), pages 190-208.
    5. de Palma, André & Lindsey, Robin, 2007. "Chapter 2 Transport user charges and cost recovery," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 19(1), pages 29-57, January.
    6. Peter Tisato, 1997. "User Economies of Scale: Bus Subsidy in Adelaide," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 73(223), pages 329-347, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:adl:wpaper:1991-05. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Qazi Haque (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/decadau.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.