IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/elg/eechap/18895_2.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Strengths and weaknesses of traditional arrangments for electricity supply

In: Handbook on Electricity Markets

Author

Listed:
  • Richard Schmalensee

Abstract

This chapter compares the performance of traditional arrangements for electricity supply, which existed prior to the wave of restructuring that began in the late 1990s, with the restructured arrangements that emerged thereafter. The diversity of traditional arrangements is discussed, as is the different ways in which restructuring increased the roles of competition and organised markets. Comparisons are made between the performance of systems in the historical regime, in which essentially all generation is dispatchable and variable energy resources (VERs) are unimportant, and between those in the emerging regime, in which VERs play a significant role in electricity supply. The chapter relies heavily on comparisons in the United States, where traditional and restructured systems have existed side by side. The discussion of the emerging regime relies heavily on anecdotal evidence from two US states with ambitious VER goals but very different electricity supply arrangements.

Suggested Citation

  • Richard Schmalensee, 2021. "Strengths and weaknesses of traditional arrangments for electricity supply," Chapters, in: Jean-Michel Glachant & Paul L. Joskow & Michael G. Pollitt (ed.), Handbook on Electricity Markets, chapter 2, pages 13-35, Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Handle: RePEc:elg:eechap:18895_2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.elgaronline.com/view/edcoll/9781788979948/9781788979948.00008.xml
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Simshauser, P., 2022. "On dividends and market valuations of Australia’s listed electricity utilities: regulated vs. merchant," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 2229, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    2. Simshauser, Paul, 2023. "On dividend policy and market valuations of Australia’s listed electricity utilities: Regulated vs. merchant," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 696-715.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:elg:eechap:18895_2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Darrel McCalla (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.e-elgar.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.