IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/aec/ieed05/05-49.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Fuzzy cluster analysis on Spanish public universities

In: Investigaciones de Economía de la Educación 5

Author

Listed:
  • Adela García Aracil

    (INGENIO (CSIC-UPV))

  • Davinia Palomares Montero

    (INGENIO (CSIC-UPV))

Abstract

The present study tries to provide an alternative approach to the analysis of universities, by grouping Spanish public universities for the academic year 2006, into clusters that are statistically similar across all criteria, without making assumptions about the relative importance of each criterion. In (non fuzzy) clustering techniques, universities grouped according to particular performance. However, the same university could be important from more than one perspective at the same time, and to different degrees. Thus, in our view, a fuzzy clustering approach is more applicable. The results of the present analysis provide information on the situations of each Spanish public university within a national context.

Suggested Citation

  • Adela García Aracil & Davinia Palomares Montero, 2010. "Fuzzy cluster analysis on Spanish public universities," Investigaciones de Economía de la Educación volume 5, in: María Jesús Mancebón-Torrubia & Domingo P. Ximénez-de-Embún & José María Gómez-Sancho & Gregorio Gim (ed.), Investigaciones de Economía de la Educación 5, edition 1, volume 5, chapter 49, pages 976-994, Asociación de Economía de la Educación.
    • Handle: RePEc:aec:ieed05:05-49
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://repec.economicsofeducation.com/2010zaragoza/05-49.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Adela García-Aracil & Antonio Gutiérrez Gracia & Marián Pérez-Marín, 2006. "Analysis of the evaluation process of the research performance: An empirical case," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 67(2), pages 213-230, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alfonso Ibáñez & Pedro Larrañaga & Concha Bielza, 2013. "Cluster methods for assessing research performance: exploring Spanish computer science," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 97(3), pages 571-600, December.
    2. CASANI, Fernando & De FILIPPO, Daniela & PÉREZ-ESPARRELLS, Carmen & SANZ-CASADO, Elías, 2012. "La Posición Investigadora De Los Sistemas Universitarios Regionales A Través De Su Producción Científica," Regional and Sectoral Economic Studies, Euro-American Association of Economic Development, vol. 12(3).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cabeza-Pullés, Dainelis & Fernández-Pérez, Virginia & Roldán-Bravo, María Isabel, 2020. "Internal networking and innovation ambidexterity: The mediating role of knowledge management processes in university research," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 450-461.
    2. Liney Manjarrés-Henríquez & Antonio Gutiérrez-Gracia & Jaider Vega-Jurado, 2008. "Coexistence of university-industry relations and academic research: Barrier to or incentive for scientific productivity," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 76(3), pages 561-576, September.
    3. J. W. Fedderke, 2013. "The objectivity of national research foundation peer review in South Africa assessed against bibliometric indexes," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 97(2), pages 177-206, November.
    4. Pedro Cosme Vieira & Aurora A. C. Teixeira, 2010. "Are finance, management, and marketing autonomous fields of scientific research? An analysis based on journal citations," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 85(3), pages 627-646, December.
    5. Chiang Kao & Hwei-Lan Pao, 2009. "An evaluation of research performance in management of 168 Taiwan universities," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 78(2), pages 261-277, February.
    6. Perianes-Rodríguez, Antonio & Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Zaida & Vargas-Quesada, Benjamín & Olmeda Gómez, Carlos & Moya-Anegón, Félix, 2009. "Synthetic hybrid indicators based on scientific collaboration to quantify and evaluate individual research results," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 3(2), pages 91-101.
    7. Johannes W. Fedderke, 2012. "The Objectivity of National Research Foundation Peer Review Based Ratings in South Africa," Working Papers 300, Economic Research Southern Africa.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    evaluation of universities; fuzzy cluster; Spanish public universities;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • A2 - General Economics and Teaching - - Economic Education and Teaching of Economics
    • C14 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Semiparametric and Nonparametric Methods: General
    • I23 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Higher Education; Research Institutions

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aec:ieed05:05-49. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Domingo P. Ximénez-de-Embún (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aedeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.