IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/b/zbw/diestu/48.html
   My bibliography  Save this book

Agricultural policies in Sub-Saharan Africa: understanding CAADP and APRM policy processes

Author

Listed:
  • Zimmermann, Roukayatou
  • Brüntrup, Michael
  • Kolavalli, Shashidhara
  • Flaherty, Kathleen

Abstract

It is widely acknowledged that a well-performing agricultural sector is fundamental for Africa’s overall economic growth, as well for as addressing hunger, poverty, and inequality. However, for the last decades the sector has stagnated, it has been taxed and/or neglected by both governments and donors and has not been able to accomplish its role for development. The New Partnership for Africa’s Development (NEPAD) – the economic programme of the African Union (AU) – early on recognised the importance of agriculture and the weaknesses of member countries’ agricultural policies. NEPAD developed a special initiative, namely the Comprehensive Africa Agriculture Development Programme (CAADP), to improve agricultural policies on the continent. Another NEPAD initiative, the African Peer Review Mechanism(APRM), is likewise supposed to have major impacts on agriculture. This study examines how the CAADP and APRM can and do influence agricultural policies and strategies at the country level. It is based on detailed case studies conducted in Ghana and Kenya and a rapid assessment in Uganda. The key issues analysed, which, in keeping with the new aid effectiveness agenda and NEPAD principles, were supposed to improve agricultural policy processes and their impacts, are ownership, participation, use of scientific evidence, including peer review elements, and alignment. The study works out strengths and weaknesses of past agricultural policies as well as NEPAD initiatives, elaborating recommendations on how best to improve these initiatives to make them fully operational for agricultural development in Africa.

Suggested Citation

  • Zimmermann, Roukayatou & Brüntrup, Michael & Kolavalli, Shashidhara & Flaherty, Kathleen, 2009. "Agricultural policies in Sub-Saharan Africa: understanding CAADP and APRM policy processes," Studies, German Development Institute / Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik (DIE), volume 48, number 48.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:diestu:48
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/199173/1/die-study-48.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kwamina E. Banson & Nam C. Nguyen & Ockie J. H. Bosch & Thich V. Nguyen, 2015. "A Systems Thinking Approach to Address the Complexity of Agribusiness for Sustainable Development in Africa: A Case Study in Ghana," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(6), pages 672-688, November.
    2. Mogues, Tewodaj, 2012. "What determines public expenditure allocations?: A review of theories, and implications for agricultural public investments," IFPRI discussion papers 1216, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    3. Michael Brüntrup & Roukayatou Zimmermann, 2009. "Agriculture as the Potential Engine for African Growth and the Role of NEPAD," CESifo Forum, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 10(04), pages 23-29, January.
    4. Benin, Samuel, 2016. "Impacts of CAADP on Africa’s agricultural-led development:," IFPRI discussion papers 1553, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    5. Caesar Agula & Mamudu Abunga Akudugu & Franklin Nantui Mabe & Saa Dittoh, 2018. "Promoting ecosystem-friendly irrigation farm management practices for sustainable livelihoods in Africa: the Ghanaian experience," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 6(1), pages 1-21, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:diestu:48. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/ditubde.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.