IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zbw/jumsac/295034.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is Cash (the only) King? – Eine kritische Analyse der Aussagekraft von Kapitalflussrechnungen nach IAS 7
[Is Cash (the only) King? – A critical analysis of the relevance of Cashflow figures according to IAS 7]

Author

Listed:
  • Pütter, Jonas

Abstract

Die Aussage "Cash is King" wird häufig getätigt, um eine besondere praktische Relevanz von Cashflow-Größen der Kapitalflussrechnung für den externen Adressaten des Jahresabschlusses hervorzuheben. Cashflow-Größen wird insbesondere eine geringe Beeinflussbarkeit durch Bilanzpolitik zugesprochen und somit eine besondere Eignung als Maß des Unternehmenserfolgs. Im Rahmen dieser Arbeit wird die tatsächliche Aussagekraft von Cashflow-Größen der Kapitalflussrechnung nach IAS 7 eingeordnet. Dazu wird zum einen die Beeinflussbarkeit der Kapitalflussrechnung durch bilanzpolitische Maßnahmen untersucht. Zum anderen wird Literatur betrachtet, welche die Aussagekraft von Cashflow- und Ergebnis-Größen über den Erfolg eines Unternehmens gegenüberstellt. Ein wichtiges Resultat der Arbeit ist, dass Unternehmen durch die Ausübung des Wahlrechtes zur indirekten Darstellung des Cashflows aus betrieblicher Tätigkeit, die Aussagekraft ihrer Kapitalflussrechnung beschränken. Aus diesem Grunde wäre eine Verpflichtung zur Veröffentlichung einer direkten Darstellung des Cashflows aus betrieblicher Tätigkeit wünschenswert.

Suggested Citation

  • Pütter, Jonas, 2023. "Is Cash (the only) King? – Eine kritische Analyse der Aussagekraft von Kapitalflussrechnungen nach IAS 7 [Is Cash (the only) King? – A critical analysis of the relevance of Cashflow figures accordi," Junior Management Science (JUMS), Junior Management Science e. V., vol. 8(1), pages 219-236.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:jumsac:295034
    DOI: 10.5282/jums/v8i1pp219-236
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/295034/1/5196-3502.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5282/jums/v8i1pp219-236?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wolfgang Schultze & Martin Meyer, 2005. "Die Kapitalflussrechnung in der Unternehmensbewertung: Bewertungskalkül und Gestaltungshinweise," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 289-324, September.
    2. Gopal V. Krishnan & James A. Largay III, 2000. "The Predictive Ability of Direct Method Cash Flow Information," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(1&2), pages 215-245.
    3. Ehsan Khansalar & Mohammad Namazi, 2017. "Cash flow disaggregation and prediction of cash flow," Journal of Applied Accounting Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 18(4), pages 464-479, November.
    4. Shadi Farshadfar & Reza Monem, 2013. "The usefulness of operating cash flow and accrual components in improving the predictive ability of earnings: a re-examination and extension," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 53(4), pages 1061-1082, December.
    5. Cheng, CSA & Liu, CS & Schaefer, TF, 1996. "Earnings permanence and the incremental information content of cash flows from operations," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(1), pages 173-181.
    6. Dechow, Patricia M., 1994. "Accounting earnings and cash flows as measures of firm performance : The role of accounting accruals," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 3-42, July.
    7. repec:eme:jaar00:jaar-02-2015-0011 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Dechow, Patricia M. & Kothari, S. P. & L. Watts, Ross, 1998. "The relation between earnings and cash flows," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 25(2), pages 133-168, May.
    9. repec:eme:mfppss:v:40:y:2014:i:7:p:646-661 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Nelson, Karen K. & Barth, Mary E. & Cram, Donald, 2001. "Accruals and the Prediction of Future Cash Flows," Research Papers 1594r, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
    11. C. Cheng & Dana Hollie, 2008. "Do core and non-core cash flows from operations persist differentially in predicting future cash flows?," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 31(1), pages 29-53, July.
    12. Gopal V. Krishnan & James A. Largay III, 2000. "The Predictive Ability of Direct Method Cash Flow Information," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(1‐2), pages 215-245, January.
    13. Finger, Ca, 1994. "The Ability Of Earnings To Predict Future Earnings And Cash Flow," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(2), pages 210-223.
    14. Nallareddy, Suresh & Sethuraman, Mani & Venkatachalam, Mohan, 2020. "Changes in accrual properties and operating environment: Implications for cash flow predictability," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(2).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Richard Kent & Jacqueline Birt, 2021. "IAS 7 and value relevance: the direct method versus the indirect method," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 26(4), pages 1532-1586, December.
    2. Takashi Obinata, 2002. "Concept and Relevance of Income," CIRJE F-Series CIRJE-F-171, CIRJE, Faculty of Economics, University of Tokyo.
    3. Li Yu (Colly) He & Sue Wright & Elaine Evans, 2018. "Is fair value information relevant to investment decision-making: Evidence from the Australian agricultural sector?," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 43(4), pages 555-574, November.
    4. Mary E. Barth & Greg Clinch & Doron Israeli, 2016. "What do accruals tell us about future cash flows?," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 768-807, September.
    5. Ball, Ray & Nikolaev, Valeri V., 2022. "On earnings and cash flows as predictors of future cash flows," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(1).
    6. C.S. Agnes Cheng & Simon S.M. Yang, 2003. "The Incremental Information Content of Earnings and Cash Flows from Operations Affected by Their Extremity," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(1‐2), pages 73-116, January.
    7. Yang Pang & Shimeng Shi & Yukun Shi & Yang Zhao, 2022. "A nonlinear dynamic approach to cash flow forecasting," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 59(1), pages 205-237, July.
    8. Ahmad Nasseri & Mohammad Sayyadi & Hassan Yazdifar & Rasol Eskandari & Mohammad Albahloul, 2018. "Causality between Cash Flow and Earnings: Evidence from Tehran (Iran) Stock Exchange," Journal of Emerging Market Finance, Institute for Financial Management and Research, vol. 17(2), pages 210-228, August.
    9. C. Cheng & Dana Hollie, 2008. "Do core and non-core cash flows from operations persist differentially in predicting future cash flows?," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 31(1), pages 29-53, July.
    10. Farshadfar, Shadi & Monem, Reza, 2013. "Further Evidence on the Usefulness of Direct Method Cash Flow Components for Forecasting Future Cash Flows," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 111-133.
    11. Richard Anthony Kent & Di Bu, 2020. "The importance of cash flow disclosure and cost of capital," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 60(S1), pages 877-908, April.
    12. Shadi Farshadfar & Reza Monem, 2013. "The usefulness of operating cash flow and accrual components in improving the predictive ability of earnings: a re-examination and extension," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 53(4), pages 1061-1082, December.
    13. Baljit K. Sidhu & CHUAN YU, 2021. "Direct Method Operating Cash Flow Disclosures: Determinants and Incremental Usefulness," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 57(3), pages 421-467, September.
    14. Akbar Jelodari & Fatemeh Asadi Kordshouli, 2016. "A Survey of the Role of Earnings Quality in Accurately Forecasting of Operational and Cash Circulation of Companies Listed on Tehran Stock Exchange," International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, vol. 6(4), pages 82-89, October.
    15. Noury, Benjamin & Hammami, Helmi & Ousama, A.A. & Zeitun, Rami, 2020. "The prediction of future cash flows based on operating cash flows, earnings and accruals in the French context," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 28(C).
    16. Mabel D Costa & Ahsan Habib, 2023. "Cost stickiness and firm value," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 34(2), pages 235-273, June.
    17. Myungsun Kim & William Kross, 2005. "The Ability of Earnings to Predict Future Operating Cash Flows Has Been Increasing—Not Decreasing," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(5), pages 753-780, December.
    18. Monterrey Mayoral, Juan & Sánchez Segura, Amparo, 2017. "Una evaluación empírica de los métodos de predicción de la rentabilidad y su relación con las características corporativas," Revista de Contabilidad - Spanish Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 20(1), pages 95-106.
    19. Ehsan Khansalar & Eilnaz Kashefi-Pour, 2020. "The usefulness of the double entry constraint for predicting earnings," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 54(1), pages 51-67, January.
    20. Nallareddy, Suresh & Sethuraman, Mani & Venkatachalam, Mohan, 2020. "Changes in accrual properties and operating environment: Implications for cash flow predictability," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(2).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:jumsac:295034. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://jums.academy/en/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.