IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zbw/ifweej/201814.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Innovative green-technology SMEs as an opportunity to promote financial de-risking

Author

Listed:
  • Verdolini, Elena
  • Bak, Céline
  • Ruet, Joël
  • Venkatachalam, Anbumozhi

Abstract

The authors recommend that the G20 target innovative green-technology SMEs as an opportunity to promote financial de-risking while addressing Paris Agreement commitments and UN Sustainable Development Goals. This should be achieved by creating signals for private investors through: (1) a reporting system that can help monitor the scale-up of green-technology SMEs; (2) the use of public funds to signal innovative green-technology SMEs to investors; and (3) the inclusion of SMEs in the design of green finance platforms. By implementing these recommendations, the G20 will ensure that innovative, low-carbon SMEs become attractive, low(er)-risk investment opportunities for the private sector.

Suggested Citation

  • Verdolini, Elena & Bak, Céline & Ruet, Joël & Venkatachalam, Anbumozhi, 2018. "Innovative green-technology SMEs as an opportunity to promote financial de-risking," Economics - The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal (2007-2020), Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel), vol. 12, pages 1-13.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:ifweej:201814
    DOI: 10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2018-14
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2018-14
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/176337/1/Economics_2018-14.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2018-14?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Venkatachalam Anbumozhi & Kaliappa Kalirajan & Fukunari Kimura & Xianbin Yao (ed.), 2016. "Investing on Low-Carbon Energy Systems," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-981-10-0761-3, January.
    2. Oecd, 2014. "Turkey assessment report 2014," SIGMA Country Assessment Reports 2014/2, OECD Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alenka Baggia & Matjaž Maletič & Anja Žnidaršič & Alenka Brezavšček, 2019. "Drivers and Outcomes of Green IS Adoption in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-19, March.
    2. Ezekiel Jide Fayomi & Ziska Fields & Kayode Kingsley Arogundade & Olusegun Matthew Awotunde & Christianah Olubunmi Ijamusan & Temitope Teniola Onileowo, 2019. "Evaluation of Owners’ Characteristics and Succession Practice among Small and Medium Size Manufacturing Enterprises in Ekiti State, Nigeria," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 11(3), pages 84-96.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Qing Guo & Zishan Mai, 2022. "Do Chinese Photovoltaic Products Have Trade Potential in RCEP Countries? A BP Neural-Network-Improved Trade Gravity Model Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-20, December.
    2. Varinder Jain, 2019. "Fossil Fuels, GHG Emissions and Clean Energy Development: Asian Giants in a Comparative Perspective," Millennial Asia, , vol. 10(1), pages 1-24, April.
    3. Hoe, Connie & Rodriguez, Daniela C. & Üzümcüoğlu, Yeşim & Hyder, Adnan A., 2016. "“Quitting like a Turk:” How political priority developed for tobacco control in Turkey," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 36-45.
    4. Indrani Talukdar, 2015. "Turkey: Presidential Elections, 2014," Contemporary Review of the Middle East, , vol. 2(4), pages 339-365, December.
    5. Carfí, David & Donato, Alessia & Fredella, Maria Incoronata & Squillante, Massimo, 2021. "Coopetitive games for environmental sustainability: Climate change and decision global policies," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    6. repec:gig:joupla:v:6:y:2014:i:2:p:39-72 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Chunyu Pan & Anil Kumar Shrestha & Guangyu Wang & John L. Innes & Kevin Xinwei Wang & Nuyun Li & Jinliang Li & Yeyun He & Chunguang Sheng & John-O. Niles, 2021. "A Linkage Framework for the China National Emission Trading System (CETS): Insight from Key Global Carbon Markets," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-15, July.
    8. Helble, Matthias & Majoe, Adam, 2020. "Can Environmental Regulations Drive International Trade? Lessons for Asia from the European Union’s Performance of Buildings Directive," Journal of Economic Integration, Center for Economic Integration, Sejong University, vol. 35(1), pages 69-90.
    9. Günnur Ertong Attar & Deniz Küçükşen, 2019. "Somehow Familiar but Still a Stranger: Syrian Students in Turkish Higher Education," Journal of International Migration and Integration, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 1041-1053, November.
    10. Tuba Bircan & Ulaş Sunata, 2015. "Educational Assessment of Syrian Refugees in Turkey," Migration Letters, Migration Letters, vol. 12(3), pages 226-237, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Innovation; green technology; eco-efficiency; SMEs; financial de-risking;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O31 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives
    • Q55 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environmental Economics: Technological Innovation
    • Q58 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environmental Economics: Government Policy
    • E60 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:ifweej:201814. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iwkiede.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.