IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zbw/espost/329651.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Schools, childcare infrastructures, and mothers’ time use and psychological well-being. Evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic in Denmark

Author

Listed:
  • Heisig, Jan P.
  • Gracia, Pablo
  • Morton, Thomas
  • Power, Séamus A.
  • Schaeffer, Merlin
  • Udsen, Rebecca

Abstract

Schools and childcare infrastructures are key in shaping parents’ daily routines and well-being. Focusing on COVID-19 school disruptions, we examine how women's time use and psychological well-being changed as schools and childcare facilities closed and later reopened during the first wave of the pandemic in Denmark (April 1–June 26, 2020). Using data from a longitudinal opt-in online survey with Danish residents, we find that the reopening of schools and childcare facilities was associated with declines in mothers’ childcare time and increases in their paid work time. Global measures of mothers’ psychological well-being, based on questions about life satisfaction and feelings during the last week, show only few trends over the period of reopening. The clearest one is a decline in worriedness that is, however, observed among women without co-resident children as well. Measures of the emotional experience of day-to-day activities from an activity sampling module reveal that mothers’ experiences of care work improved substantially as schools reopened. After full reopening, mothers reported much lower levels of negative emotions during care work, while no similar trend was found for other activities. These findings indicate that schools and childcare facilities play a crucial role for maternal well-being in pandemic and non-pandemic times.

Suggested Citation

  • Heisig, Jan P. & Gracia, Pablo & Morton, Thomas & Power, Séamus A. & Schaeffer, Merlin & Udsen, Rebecca, 2025. "Schools, childcare infrastructures, and mothers’ time use and psychological well-being. Evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic in Denmark," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, issue OnlineFir, pages 1-15.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:espost:329651
    DOI: 10.1177/00016993251379178
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/329651/1/Full-text-article-Heisig-et-al-Schools-childcare.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00016993251379178?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andreas Knabe & Steffen Rätzel & Ronnie Schöb & Joachim Weimann, 2010. "Dissatisfied with Life but Having a Good Day: Time-use and Well-being of the Unemployed," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 120(547), pages 867-889, September.
    2. Li, Jianghong & Bünning, Mareike & Kaiser, Till & Hipp, Lena, 2022. "Who suffered most? Parental stress and mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany [Wer leidet am stärksten? Erziehungsstress und psychische Belastungen bei Eltern während der COVID-19 Pa," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 34(1), pages 281-309.
    3. Sophia Schmitz, 2020. "The Impact of Publicly Funded Childcare on Parental Well-Being: Evidence from Cut-Off Rules," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 36(2), pages 171-196, April.
    4. repec:zbw:espost:167662 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Marta Pasqualini & Marta Dominguez Folgueras & Emanuele Ferragina & Olivier Godechot & Ettore Recchi & Mirna Safi, 2022. "Who took care of what? The gender division of unpaid work during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic in France," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 46(34), pages 1007-1036.
    6. Olivier Thévenon, 2011. "Family Policies in OECD Countries: A Comparative Analysis," Population and Development Review, The Population Council, Inc., vol. 37(1), pages 57-87, March.
    7. Schober, Pia S. & Stahl, Juliane F., 2016. "Expansion of Full-Day Childcare and Subjective Well-Being of Mothers: Interdependencies with Culture and Resources," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 32(5), pages 593-606.
    8. Stefan Stieger & David Lewetz & Viren Swami, 2021. "Emotional Well-Being Under Conditions of Lockdown: An Experience Sampling Study in Austria During the COVID-19 Pandemic," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 22(6), pages 2703-2720, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lina Tobler & Bernhard Christoph & Lukas Fervers & Marita Jacob, 2025. "When the Burden Lifts: The Effect of School and Day Care Reopenings on Parents’ Life Satisfaction," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 26(1), pages 1-34, January.
    2. Zoch, Gundula & Bächmann, Ann-Christin & Vicari, Basha, 2020. "Care-Arrangements and Parental Well-Being during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Germany," IAB-Discussion Paper 202035, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany].
    3. Mathias Huebener & Sevrin Waights & C. Katharina Spiess & Nico A. Siegel & Gert G. Wagner, 2021. "Parental well-being in times of Covid-19 in Germany," Review of Economics of the Household, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 91-122, March.
    4. Martin Kreidl & Barbora Hubatková, 2023. "Partnership satisfaction in Czechia during the COVID-19 pandemic," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 49(24), pages 635-650.
    5. Thi Truong An Hoang & Andreas Knabe, 2021. "Time Use, Unemployment, and Well-Being: An Empirical Analysis Using British Time-Use Data," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 22(6), pages 2525-2548, August.
    6. Andrew E. Clark, 2015. "SWB as a Measure of Individual Well-Being," Working Papers halshs-01134483, HAL.
    7. Lars Kunze & Nicolai Suppa, 2014. "Bowling Alone or Bowling at All? The Effect of Unemployment on Social Participation," Ruhr Economic Papers 0510, Rheinisch-Westfälisches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Universität Dortmund, Universität Duisburg-Essen.
    8. Chadi, Adrian & Hetschko, Clemens, 2025. "Income or leisure? On the hidden benefits of (un)employment," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    9. Tyler Atkinson & David Luttrell & Harvey Rosenblum, 2013. "How bad was it? The costs and consequences of the 2007–09 financial crisis," Staff Papers, Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, issue Jul.
    10. Naomi Friedman-Sokuler & Claudia Senik, 2022. "Time-Use and Subjective Well-Being: Is there a Preference for Activity Diversity?," PSE Working Papers halshs-03828272, HAL.
    11. Anne C. Gielen & Jan C. Ours, 2014. "Unhappiness and Job Finding," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 81(323), pages 544-565, July.
    12. Magen Mhaka-Mutepfa & Md Jabuyer Biswas & Leonne M. Mfolwe & Kesego D. Mathoothe & M. Tasdik Hasan, 2024. "Well-Being, Loneliness, and Quality of Relationships Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Botswana," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(2), pages 21582440241, May.
    13. Sara Baiocco & Cinzia Alcidi & Francesco Corti & Mattia Di Salvo, 2022. "Changing Social Investment Strategies in the EU," JRC Working Papers on Labour, Education and Technology 2022-01, Joint Research Centre.
    14. Binder, Martin & Coad, Alex, 2013. "“I'm afraid I have bad news for you…” Estimating the impact of different health impairments on subjective well-being," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 155-167.
    15. Goebel, Jan & Krekel, Christian & Tiefenbach, Tim & Ziebarth, Nicolas R., 2013. "Natural Disaster, Policy Action, and Mental Well-Being: The Case of Fukushima," IZA Discussion Papers 7691, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    16. Marcus Dittrich & Bianka Mey, 2015. "Are people satisfied with their time use? Empirical evidence from German survey data," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 35(4), pages 2903-2914.
    17. Flores, Gabriela & Ingenhaag, Michael & Maurer, Jürgen, 2015. "An anatomy of old-age disability: Time use, affect and experienced utility," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 150-160.
    18. Philipp, Marie-Fleur & Büchau, Silke & Schober, Pia S. & Werner, Viktoria & Spieß, C. Katharina, 2024. "How Daycare Quality Shapes Norms around Daycare Use and Parental Employment: Experimental Evidence from Germany," IZA Discussion Papers 16729, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    19. Leonhard K. Lades & Kate Laffan & Till O. Weber, 2020. "Do economic preferences predict pro-environmental behaviour?," Working Papers 202003, Geary Institute, University College Dublin.
    20. Tobias Wolf & Maria Metzing & Richard E. Lucas, 2022. "Experienced Well-Being and Labor Market Status: The Role of Pleasure and Meaning," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 163(2), pages 691-721, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:espost:329651. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/zbwkide.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.