IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zbw/espost/320727.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mobilizing Europe’s citizens to take action on migration and climate change: behavioral evidence from 27 EU member states

Author

Listed:
  • Giebler, Heiko
  • Giesecke, Johannes
  • Humphreys, Macartan
  • Hutter, Swen
  • Klüver, Heike

Abstract

This paper investigates how two politicized issues – migration and climate change – mobilize citizens across European countries. Building on the concept of issue-specific mobilization potentials, we examine citizens’ willingness to support petitions related to the two issues using an original behavioral measure embedded in the 2024 European Parliament Election Study. We document variation in political engagement and examine how opposing stances on issues owned by the left or the right mobilize citizens, how citizens’ agreement with issue positions affects support, and whether grievances, participation cultures, politicization levels, and the ideology of the national government can explain national-level variation. Our results indicate substantial variation in petition support across countries and issues, with the right-wing petition on migration attracting the most support. However, our country-level measures do not explain this variation well. Overall, our findings highlight the need for more nuanced, issue-specific approaches to understanding cross-national patterns of political participation.

Suggested Citation

  • Giebler, Heiko & Giesecke, Johannes & Humphreys, Macartan & Hutter, Swen & Klüver, Heike, 2025. "Mobilizing Europe’s citizens to take action on migration and climate change: behavioral evidence from 27 EU member states," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 0, pages 1-29.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:espost:320727
    DOI: 10.1080/13501763.2025.2512032
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/320727/1/Full-text-article-Humphreys-et-al-Mobilizing-Europes-citizens.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13501763.2025.2512032?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dalton, Russell & Van Sickle, Alix & Weldon, Steven, 2010. "The Individual–Institutional Nexus of Protest Behaviour," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 40(1), pages 51-73, January.
    2. Rooduijn, Matthijs & Pirro, Andrea L. P. & Halikiopoulou, Daphne & Froio, Caterina & Van Kessel, Stijn & De Lange, Sarah L. & Mudde, Cas & Taggart, Paul, 2024. "The PopuList: A Database of Populist, Far-Left, and Far-Right Parties Using Expert-Informed Qualitative Comparative Classification (EiQCC)," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 54(3), pages 969-978, July.
    3. Daniel Bischof & Markus Wagner, 2019. "Do Voters Polarize When Radical Parties Enter Parliament?," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 63(4), pages 888-904, October.
    4. Hutter, Swen & Kriesi, Hanspeter, 2019. "Politicizing Europe in times of crisis," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 26(7), pages 996-1017.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Borbáth, Endre & Hunger, Sophia & Hutter, Swen & Oana, Ioana-Elena, 2021. "Civic and Political Engagement during the Multifaceted COVID-19 Crisis," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 27(2), pages 311-324.
    2. Bayerlein, Michael & Diermeier, Matthias, 2022. "Exchanging money for love? A regional analysis of EU cohesion policy on euroscepticism," Kiel Working Papers 2219, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    3. Arístides Vara-Horna & Zaida Asencios-Gonzalez & Dennis López-Odar & Marivel Aguirre-Morales & Ingrid Cirilo-Acero, 2024. "The Role of Subjective Well-Being in Cuban Civil Protest against the Government: A Moderated Mediation Model," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-23, January.
    4. Wouter van der Brug & Katjana Gattermann & Claes H. de Vreese, 2022. "Electoral responses to the increased contestation over European integration. The European Elections of 2019 and beyond," European Union Politics, , vol. 23(1), pages 3-20, March.
    5. Stefan Telle & Lisanne de Blok & Catherine E. de Vries & Lorenzo Cicchi, 2022. "Elite‐Mass Linkages in the Preference Formation on Differentiated Integration," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(6), pages 1663-1683, November.
    6. Shen Yang & Alfred M. Wu, 2024. "The Political Effects of Economic Inequality: Evidence from Hong Kong," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 171(2), pages 749-769, January.
    7. Márton Bene & Melanie Magin & Daniel Jackson & Darren Lilleker & Delia Balaban & Paweł Baranowski & Jörg Haßler & Simon Kruschinski & Uta Russmann, 2022. "The Polyphonic Sounds of Europe: Users’ Engagement With Parties’ European-Focused Facebook Posts," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(1), pages 108-120.
    8. Sargis Karavardanyan, 2024. "Economic Development, Inequality and Dynamics of Social Movements in the United States: Theory and Quantitative Analysis," Journal of Quantitative Economics, Springer;The Indian Econometric Society (TIES), vol. 22(2), pages 421-474, June.
    9. Daniil Romanov & Andrey Korotayev, 2019. "«Non-Violent, But Still Dangerous»: Testing The Link Between Youth Bulges And The Intensity Of Non-Violent Protests," HSE Working papers WP BRP 69/PS/2019, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    10. Federle, Jonathan-Julian & Mohr, Cathrin & Schularick, Moritz, 2024. "Inflation surprises and election outcomes," Kiel Working Papers 2278, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    11. Brett Parker, 2021. "Death Penalty Statutes and Murder Rates: Evidence From Synthetic Controls," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(3), pages 488-533, September.
    12. Sofia Vasilopoulou & Katjana Gattermann, 2021. "Does Politicization Matter for EU Representation? A Comparison of Four European Parliament Elections," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(3), pages 661-678, May.
    13. Giorgio Malet & Stefanie Walter, 2024. "The reverberations of British Brexit politics abroad," European Union Politics, , vol. 25(1), pages 63-85, March.
    14. Niels Gheyle, 2022. "Evading Vetoes: Exiting the Politicized Decision Trap in EU Trade Policy," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(6), pages 1723-1740, November.
    15. Joseph Horrocks-Taylor, 2018. "Dirty Water, Muddied Politics: Hybridisation of Local and National Opposition to Kumtor Mine, Kyrgyzstan," Land, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-18, April.
    16. Borbáth, Endre & Gessler, Theresa, 2020. "Different worlds of contention? Protest in Northwestern, Southern and Eastern Europe," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 59(4), pages 910-935.
    17. Massimo Pulejo, 2023. "Pro-Social Backlash: The Effect of Far-Right Success on Voluntary Welfare Provision," BAFFI CAREFIN Working Papers 23214, BAFFI CAREFIN, Centre for Applied Research on International Markets Banking Finance and Regulation, Universita' Bocconi, Milano, Italy.
    18. Felix Lehmann, 2023. "Talking about Europe? Explaining the salience of the European Union in the plenaries of 17 national parliaments during 2006–2019," European Union Politics, , vol. 24(2), pages 370-389, June.
    19. Albert Chiu & Xingchen Lan & Ziyi Liu & Yiqing Xu, 2023. "Causal Panel Analysis under Parallel Trends: Lessons from a Large Reanalysis Study," Papers 2309.15983, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2025.
    20. Anja Thomas, 2023. "Who lends the EU the ‘right to govern’?: Symbolic legitimacy vs. pragmatic policy framing in party communication during the Covid-19 pandemic," RSCAS Working Papers 2023/35, European University Institute.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:espost:320727. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/zbwkide.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.