IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zbw/espost/320727.html

Mobilizing Europe’s citizens to take action on migration and climate change: behavioral evidence from 27 EU member states

Author

Listed:
  • Giebler, Heiko
  • Giesecke, Johannes
  • Humphreys, Macartan
  • Hutter, Swen
  • Klüver, Heike

Abstract

This paper investigates how two politicized issues – migration and climate change – mobilize citizens across European countries. Building on the concept of issue-specific mobilization potentials, we examine citizens’ willingness to support petitions related to the two issues using an original behavioral measure embedded in the 2024 European Parliament Election Study. We document variation in political engagement and examine how opposing stances on issues owned by the left or the right mobilize citizens, how citizens’ agreement with issue positions affects support, and whether grievances, participation cultures, politicization levels, and the ideology of the national government can explain national-level variation. Our results indicate substantial variation in petition support across countries and issues, with the right-wing petition on migration attracting the most support. However, our country-level measures do not explain this variation well. Overall, our findings highlight the need for more nuanced, issue-specific approaches to understanding cross-national patterns of political participation.

Suggested Citation

  • Giebler, Heiko & Giesecke, Johannes & Humphreys, Macartan & Hutter, Swen & Klüver, Heike, 2026. "Mobilizing Europe’s citizens to take action on migration and climate change: behavioral evidence from 27 EU member states," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 33(2), pages 607-635.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:espost:320727
    DOI: 10.1080/13501763.2025.2512032
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/320727.2/3/Full-text-article-Humphreys-et-al-Mobilizing-Europes-citizens.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13501763.2025.2512032?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dalton, Russell & Van Sickle, Alix & Weldon, Steven, 2010. "The Individual–Institutional Nexus of Protest Behaviour," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 40(1), pages 51-73, January.
    2. Rooduijn, Matthijs & Pirro, Andrea L. P. & Halikiopoulou, Daphne & Froio, Caterina & Van Kessel, Stijn & De Lange, Sarah L. & Mudde, Cas & Taggart, Paul, 2024. "The PopuList: A Database of Populist, Far-Left, and Far-Right Parties Using Expert-Informed Qualitative Comparative Classification (EiQCC)," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 54(3), pages 969-978, July.
    3. Hutter, Swen & Kriesi, Hanspeter, 2019. "Politicizing Europe in times of crisis," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 26(7), pages 996-1017.
    4. Daniel Bischof & Markus Wagner, 2019. "Do Voters Polarize When Radical Parties Enter Parliament?," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 63(4), pages 888-904, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jansesberger, Viktoria, 2024. "Storms, floods, landslides and elections in India's growing metropolises: Hotbeds for political protest?," Working Papers 28, University of Konstanz, Cluster of Excellence "The Politics of Inequality. Perceptions, Participation and Policies".
    2. Rauh, Christian & Parizek, Michal, 2024. "Converging on Europe? The European Union in mediatised debates during the COVID-19 and Ukraine shocks," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 31(10), pages 3036-3065.
    3. Petrova, Bilyana & Ranaldi, Marco, 2021. "Determinants of Income Composition Inequality," SocArXiv vyrz7, Center for Open Science.
    4. Borbáth, Endre & Hunger, Sophia & Hutter, Swen & Oana, Ioana-Elena, 2021. "Civic and Political Engagement during the Multifaceted COVID-19 Crisis," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 27(2), pages 311-324.
    5. Andres Reiljan & Lorenzo Cicchi & Diego Garzia, 2023. "Party placement in the void: the European political space in 10 years of cross-national Voting Advice Applications," RSCAS Working Papers 2023/20, European University Institute.
    6. Luca Carrieri, 2024. "Awakening the Europhile Giant: EU Issue Voting in Western and Central‐Eastern Europe," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(1), pages 262-284, January.
    7. Bayerlein, Michael & Diermeier, Matthias, 2022. "Exchanging money for love? A regional analysis of EU cohesion policy on euroscepticism," Kiel Working Papers 2219, Kiel Institute for the World Economy.
    8. repec:osf:socarx:vyrz7_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Arístides Vara-Horna & Zaida Asencios-Gonzalez & Dennis López-Odar & Marivel Aguirre-Morales & Ingrid Cirilo-Acero, 2024. "The Role of Subjective Well-Being in Cuban Civil Protest against the Government: A Moderated Mediation Model," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-23, January.
    10. Wouter van der Brug & Katjana Gattermann & Claes H. de Vreese, 2022. "Electoral responses to the increased contestation over European integration. The European Elections of 2019 and beyond," European Union Politics, , vol. 23(1), pages 3-20, March.
    11. repec:osf:socarx:d8vbq_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Nora A. Kirkizh & Olessia Y. Koltsova, 2018. "Online News and Protest Participation in a Political Context: Evidence from Self-Reported Cross-Sectional Data," HSE Working papers WP BRP 58/PS/2018, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    13. Stefan Telle & Lisanne de Blok & Catherine E. de Vries & Lorenzo Cicchi, 2022. "Elite‐Mass Linkages in the Preference Formation on Differentiated Integration," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(6), pages 1663-1683, November.
    14. Shen Yang & Alfred M. Wu, 2024. "The Political Effects of Economic Inequality: Evidence from Hong Kong," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 171(2), pages 749-769, January.
    15. repec:rim:rimwps:24-14 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Alex Andrione‐Moylan & Pieter de Wilde & Kolja Raube, 2024. "(De‐)politicization Discourse Strategies: The Case of Trade," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(1), pages 21-37, January.
    17. repec:osf:socarx:wpjbz_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Daniel Tuki & Hussaini Kwari, 2025. "Let the poor breathe! Poverty and anti-government protests in Nigeria," HiCN Working Papers 426, Households in Conflict Network.
    19. Joost Berkhout & Marcel Hanegraaff & Patrick Statsch, 2020. "Interest Groups in Multi-Level Contexts: European Integration as Cross-Cutting Issue in Party-Interest Group Contacts," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(1), pages 61-71.
    20. Márton Bene & Melanie Magin & Daniel Jackson & Darren Lilleker & Delia Balaban & Paweł Baranowski & Jörg Haßler & Simon Kruschinski & Uta Russmann, 2022. "The Polyphonic Sounds of Europe: Users’ Engagement With Parties’ European-Focused Facebook Posts," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(1), pages 108-120.
    21. Sargis Karavardanyan, 2024. "Economic Development, Inequality and Dynamics of Social Movements in the United States: Theory and Quantitative Analysis," Journal of Quantitative Economics, Springer;The Indian Econometric Society (TIES), vol. 22(2), pages 421-474, June.
    22. David Johann & Markus Steinbrecher & Kathrin Thomas, 2020. "Channels of participation: Political participant types and personality," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(10), pages 1-13, October.
    23. Hutter, Swen, 2025. "Game Changers: National Referendums and the Politicization of Europe," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 13, pages 1-20.
    24. Daniil Romanov & Andrey Korotayev, 2019. "«Non-Violent, But Still Dangerous»: Testing The Link Between Youth Bulges And The Intensity Of Non-Violent Protests," HSE Working papers WP BRP 69/PS/2019, National Research University Higher School of Economics.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:espost:320727. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/zbwkide.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.