IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zbw/espost/198593.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Editorial – Communication and internet policy: a critical rights-based history and future

Author

Listed:
  • Kerr, Aphra
  • Musiani, Francesca
  • Pohle, Julia

Abstract

This special issue of Internet Policy Review brings together a hand-picked selection of articles presented in the Communication Policy and Technology (CPT) section at the annual conference of the International Association for Media and Communication Research (IAMCR) in Eugene, Oregon (USA), 2018. With different theoretical perspectives, methodologies, and geographical scope, the five papers in this issue address how ideal-type rights and values are translated into highly variable rules, regulations, policies and practices in different countries and regions around the world. Drawing from their respective case studies, the papers examine a number of consequences of this gap for internet users, as citizens and consumers. Building on these papers, the editorial discusses some recent evolutions of the internet policy field, and introduces the critical and ‘engaged scholarship’ approach that IAMCR and its CPT section have displayed over the years in their analyses of communication and internet policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Kerr, Aphra & Musiani, Francesca & Pohle, Julia, 2019. "Editorial – Communication and internet policy: a critical rights-based history and future," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 8(1), pages 1-16.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:espost:198593
    DOI: 10.14763/2019.1.1395
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/198593/1/f-22007-full-text-Pohle-et_al-Communication-v3.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.14763/2019.1.1395?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pohle, Julia & Van Audenhove, Leo, 2017. "Post-Snowden internet policy: between public outrage, resistance and policy change," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 5(1), pages 1-6.
    2. Julia Pohle & Leo Van Audenhove, 2017. "Post-Snowden Internet Policy: Between Public Outrage, Resistance and Policy Change," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(1), pages 1-6.
    3. Pohle, Julia & Hösl, Maximilian & Kniep, Ronja, 2016. "Analysing internet policy as a field of struggle," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 5(3), pages 1-21.
    4. Alison Powell & Alissa Cooper, 2011. "Net neutrality discourses: comparing advocacy and regulatory arguments in the United States and the United Kingdom," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 39024, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    5. Melody, William H., 1999. "Telecom reform: progress and prospects," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 7-34, February.
    6. Epstein, Dmitry & Katzenbach, Christian & Musiani, Francesca, 2016. "Doing internet governance: practices, controversies, infrastructures, and institutions," Internet Policy Review: Journal on Internet Regulation, Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG), Berlin, vol. 5(3), pages 1-14.
    7. Kruschinski, Simon & Haller, André, 2017. "Restrictions on data-driven political micro-targeting in Germany," Internet Policy Review: Journal on Internet Regulation, Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG), Berlin, vol. 6(4), pages 1-23.
    8. Daly, Angela & Thomas, Julian, 2017. "Australian internet policy," Internet Policy Review: Journal on Internet Regulation, Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG), Berlin, vol. 6(1), pages 1-12.
    9. Jo PIERSON, 2012. "Online Privacy in Social Media: A Conceptual Exploration of Empowerment and Vulnerability," Communications & Strategies, IDATE, Com&Strat dept., vol. 1(88), pages 99-120, 4th quart.
    10. DeNardis, L. & Hackl, A.M., 2015. "Internet governance by social media platforms," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(9), pages 761-770.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kerr, Aphra & Musiani, Francesca & Pohle, Julia, 2019. "Editorial – Communication and internet policy: a critical rights-based history and future," Internet Policy Review: Journal on Internet Regulation, Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG), Berlin, vol. 8(1), pages 1-16.
    2. Manuel Becker, 2019. "When public principals give up control over private agents: The new independence of ICANN in internet governance," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(4), pages 561-576, December.
    3. Cecere, Grazia & Rochelandet, Fabrice, 2013. "Privacy intrusiveness and web audiences: Empirical evidence," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(10), pages 1004-1014.
    4. Katharina Baum & Olga Abramova & Stefan Meißner & Hanna Krasnova, 2023. "The effects of targeted political advertising on user privacy concerns and digital product acceptance: A preference-based approach," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 33(1), pages 1-17, December.
    5. König Pascal D., 2020. "Why Digital-Era Political Marketing is Not the Death Knell for Democracy: On the Importance of Placing Political Microtargeting in the Context of Party Competition," Statistics, Politics and Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 11(1), pages 87-110, June.
    6. Hongyang He & Bin Zhang, 2022. "Effective Synergy of Market Agents: The Core of Achieving Multi-Agent Governance on the Internet Platform," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-20, December.
    7. Grygiel, Jennifer & Brown, Nina, 2019. "Are social media companies motivated to be good corporate citizens? Examination of the connection between corporate social responsibility and social media safety," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(5), pages 445-460.
    8. Cath, Corinne, 2021. "The technology we choose to create: Human rights advocacy in the Internet Engineering Task Force," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(6).
    9. Dobber, Tom & Ó Fathaigh, Ronan & Zuiderveen Borgesius, Frederik J., 2019. "The regulation of online political micro-targeting in Europe," Internet Policy Review: Journal on Internet Regulation, Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG), Berlin, vol. 8(4), pages 1-20.
    10. Mann, Monique & Daly, Angela & Molnar, Adam, 2020. "Regulatory arbitrage and transnational surveillance: Australia's extraterritorial assistance to access encrypted communications," Internet Policy Review: Journal on Internet Regulation, Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG), Berlin, vol. 9(3), pages 1-20.
    11. Berg, Sebastian & Hofmann, Jeanette, 2021. "Digital democracy," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 10(4), pages 1-23.
    12. Arora, Kim, 2020. "Privacy and data protection in India and Germany: A comparative analysis," Discussion Papers, Research Group Politics of Digitalization SP III 2020-501, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    13. Jacques Simon Song & Georges Ngnouwal Eloundou & Fabrice Bitoto Ewolo & Blaise Ondoua Beyene, 2024. "Does Social Media Contribute to Economic Growth?," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(2), pages 8349-8389, June.
    14. Ruparel, Namita & Dhir, Amandeep & Tandon, Anushree & Kaur, Puneet & Islam, Jamid Ul, 2020. "The influence of online professional social media in human resource management: A systematic literature review," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    15. Tréguer, Félix, 2017. "Gaps and bumps in the political history of the internet," Internet Policy Review: Journal on Internet Regulation, Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG), Berlin, vol. 6(4), pages 1-21.
    16. Angst, Mario, 2024. "What is digitalization policy? Domain(s), drivers and a definition from a policy integration perspective," SocArXiv xykej, Center for Open Science.
    17. Berg, Sebastian & Rakowski, Niklas & Thiel, Thorsten, 2020. "Die digitale Konstellation. Eine Positionsbestimmung," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 30(2), pages 171-191.
    18. Asquer, Alberto, 2011. "Liberalization and regulatory reform of network industries: A comparative analysis of Italian public utilities," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 19(3), pages 172-184.
    19. Hintz, Arne & Dencik, Lina, 2016. "The politics of surveillance policy: UK regulatory dynamics after Snowden," Internet Policy Review: Journal on Internet Regulation, Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG), Berlin, vol. 5(3), pages 1-16.
    20. Berg, Sebastian & Hofmann, Jeanette, 2022. "Democracia Digital," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, issue Número Es, pages 1-26.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:espost:198593. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/zbwkide.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.