IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wut/journl/v4y2003p8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sensitivity analysis in sequencing problems

Author

Listed:
  • Adam Kasperski

Abstract

In this paper, three particular sequencing problems are considered. It is shown how to perform the sensitivity analysis for each of these problems. The sensitivity analysis consists in checking how the values of given parameters can vary so that the obtained optimal sequence of jobs remains optimal.

Suggested Citation

  • Adam Kasperski, 2003. "Sensitivity analysis in sequencing problems," Operations Research and Decisions, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Management, vol. 13(4), pages 85-96.
    • Handle: RePEc:wut:journl:v:4:y:2003:p:8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ord.pwr.edu.pl/assets/papers_archive/200349%20-%20published.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. E. L. Lawler, 1973. "Optimal Sequencing of a Single Machine Subject to Precedence Constraints," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 19(5), pages 544-546, January.
    2. S. M. Johnson, 1954. "Optimal two‐ and three‐stage production schedules with setup times included," Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 1(1), pages 61-68, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. S.S. Panwalkar & Christos Koulamas, 2015. "Scheduling research and the first decade of NRLQ: A historical perspective," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 62(4), pages 335-344, June.
    2. A.A. Gladky & Y.M. Shafransky & V.A. Strusevich, 2004. "Flow Shop Scheduling Problems Under Machine–Dependent Precedence Constraints," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 13-28, March.
    3. Shabtay, Dvir & Gilenson, Miri, 2023. "A state-of-the-art survey on multi-scenario scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 310(1), pages 3-23.
    4. Stanisław Gawiejnowicz, 2020. "A review of four decades of time-dependent scheduling: main results, new topics, and open problems," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 3-47, February.
    5. S.S. Panwalkar & Milton L. Smith & Christos Koulamas, 2013. "Review of the ordered and proportionate flow shop scheduling research," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 60(1), pages 46-55, February.
    6. Enrique Gerstl & Gur Mosheiov, 2020. "Single machine scheduling to maximize the number of on-time jobs with generalized due-dates," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 289-299, June.
    7. Wlodzimierz Szwarc & Jatinder N. D. Gupta, 1987. "A flow‐shop problem with sequence‐dependent additive setup times," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 34(5), pages 619-627, October.
    8. Liqi Zhang & Lingfa Lu & Shisheng Li, 2016. "New results on two-machine flow-shop scheduling with rejection," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 31(4), pages 1493-1504, May.
    9. Brammer, Janis & Lutz, Bernhard & Neumann, Dirk, 2022. "Permutation flow shop scheduling with multiple lines and demand plans using reinforcement learning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 299(1), pages 75-86.
    10. Ramachandra, Girish & Elmaghraby, Salah E., 2006. "Sequencing precedence-related jobs on two machines to minimize the weighted completion time," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(1), pages 44-58, March.
    11. Vincent T’kindt & Federico Della Croce & Mathieu Liedloff, 2022. "Moderate exponential-time algorithms for scheduling problems," 4OR, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 533-566, December.
    12. Jerzy Kamburowski, 2003. "On the unknown contribution of Stefan Chanas to the stochastic flow shop analysis," Operations Research and Decisions, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Management, vol. 13(4), pages 75-83.
    13. Bachtenkirch, David & Bock, Stefan, 2022. "Finding efficient make-to-order production and batch delivery schedules," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 297(1), pages 133-152.
    14. Vineet Jain & Tilak Raj, 2018. "An adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system for makespan estimation of flexible manufacturing system assembly shop: a case study," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 9(6), pages 1302-1314, December.
    15. Rubing Chen & Jinjiang Yuan, 2020. "Single-machine scheduling of proportional-linearly deteriorating jobs with positional due indices," 4OR, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 177-196, June.
    16. Golpîra, Hêriş, 2020. "Smart Energy-Aware Manufacturing Plant Scheduling under Uncertainty: A Risk-Based Multi-Objective Robust Optimization Approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    17. Alexander Grigoriev & Martijn Holthuijsen & Joris van de Klundert, 2005. "Basic scheduling problems with raw material constraints," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 52(6), pages 527-535, September.
    18. Reha Uzsoy & Chung‐Yee Lee & Louis A. Martin‐Vega, 1992. "Scheduling semiconductor test operations: Minimizing maximum lateness and number of tardy jobs on a single machine," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(3), pages 369-388, April.
    19. Anna Arigliano & Gianpaolo Ghiani & Antonio Grieco & Emanuela Guerriero, 2017. "Single-machine time-dependent scheduling problems with fixed rate-modifying activities and resumable jobs," 4OR, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 201-215, June.
    20. A. G. Leeftink & R. J. Boucherie & E. W. Hans & M. A. M. Verdaasdonk & I. M. H. Vliegen & P. J. Diest, 2018. "Batch scheduling in the histopathology laboratory," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 30(1), pages 171-197, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wut:journl:v:4:y:2003:p:8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Adam Kasperski (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iopwrpl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.