IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/ijsaem/v9y2018i6d10.1007_s13198-018-0729-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system for makespan estimation of flexible manufacturing system assembly shop: a case study

Author

Listed:
  • Vineet Jain

    (Amity University Haryana)

  • Tilak Raj

    (YMCA University of Science and Technology)

Abstract

This paper considers the use of combination of neural networks and fuzzy system i.e. adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) applied to the n job, m machine real flexible manufacturing system assembly shop problem with the objective of prediction of makespan. Assembly shop makespan is calculated by Nawaz, Enscor, and Ham (NEH) algorithm. On the basis of this algorithm, adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system model is made to predict the makespan of the jobs. The purpose of this study is to find the makespan estimation in advance if processing time of machines is known. The purpose of this research is to gain the advantage of the capabilities of both Fuzzy systems, which is a rule-based approach and neural network which focus on the network training. This model has been verified by testing and actual data set with the average percentage accuracy achieved is 95.97%. Coefficient of determination and Correlation coefficient is 0.9310 and 0.9649 respectively. The derived values of ANFIS model output are found within the range after being verified practically. Therefore, it can be concluded that makespan calculation of the production system, by the proposed adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system, can be used as a reliable approach in estimating the makespan of flexible manufacturing system assembly shop.

Suggested Citation

  • Vineet Jain & Tilak Raj, 2018. "An adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system for makespan estimation of flexible manufacturing system assembly shop: a case study," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 9(6), pages 1302-1314, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:ijsaem:v:9:y:2018:i:6:d:10.1007_s13198-018-0729-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s13198-018-0729-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13198-018-0729-6
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s13198-018-0729-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. H.M. Raaymakers, Wenny & Will M. Bertrand, J. & C. Fransoo, Jan, 2001. "Makespan estimation in batch process industries using aggregate resource and job set characteristics," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(2), pages 145-161, March.
    2. Herbert G. Campbell & Richard A. Dudek & Milton L. Smith, 1970. "A Heuristic Algorithm for the n Job, m Machine Sequencing Problem," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 16(10), pages 630-637, June.
    3. Mellit, Adel & Kalogirou, Soteris A., 2011. "ANFIS-based modelling for photovoltaic power supply system: A case study," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 250-258.
    4. Framinan, Jose M. & Perez-Gonzalez, Paz, 2015. "On heuristic solutions for the stochastic flowshop scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 246(2), pages 413-420.
    5. Sabuncuoglu, Ihsan & Gurgun, Burckaan, 1996. "A neural network model for scheduling problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 93(2), pages 288-299, September.
    6. Wilson, Amy D. & King, Russell E. & Wilson, James R., 2004. "Case study on statistically estimating minimum makespan for flow line scheduling problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 155(2), pages 439-454, June.
    7. Taillard, E., 1990. "Some efficient heuristic methods for the flow shop sequencing problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 65-74, July.
    8. Raaymakers, W. H. M. & Weijters, A. J. M. M., 2003. "Makespan estimation in batch process industries: A comparison between regression analysis and neural networks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 145(1), pages 14-30, February.
    9. S. M. Johnson, 1954. "Optimal two‐ and three‐stage production schedules with setup times included," Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 1(1), pages 61-68, March.
    10. Cheng, T. C. E. & Gupta, M. C., 1989. "Survey of scheduling research involving due date determination decisions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 38(2), pages 156-166, January.
    11. Nawaz, Muhammad & Enscore Jr, E Emory & Ham, Inyong, 1983. "A heuristic algorithm for the m-machine, n-job flow-shop sequencing problem," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 11(1), pages 91-95.
    12. Kalczynski, Pawel Jan & Kamburowski, Jerzy, 2007. "On the NEH heuristic for minimizing the makespan in permutation flow shops," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 53-60, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kalczynski, Pawel J. & Kamburowski, Jerzy, 2009. "An empirical analysis of the optimality rate of flow shop heuristics," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 198(1), pages 93-101, October.
    2. Fernandez-Viagas, Victor & Talens, Carla & Framinan, Jose M., 2022. "Assembly flowshop scheduling problem: Speed-up procedure and computational evaluation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 299(3), pages 869-882.
    3. K Sheibani, 2010. "A fuzzy greedy heuristic for permutation flow-shop scheduling," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 61(5), pages 813-818, May.
    4. Li, Wei & Nault, Barrie R. & Ye, Honghan, 2019. "Trade-off balancing in scheduling for flow shop production and perioperative processes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 273(3), pages 817-830.
    5. Sündüz Dağ, 2013. "An Application On Flowshop Scheduling," Alphanumeric Journal, Bahadir Fatih Yildirim, vol. 1(1), pages 47-56, December.
    6. Solimanpur, M. & Vrat, Prem & Shankar, Ravi, 2004. "A heuristic to minimize makespan of cell scheduling problem," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(3), pages 231-241, April.
    7. Raaymakers, W. H. M. & Weijters, A. J. M. M., 2003. "Makespan estimation in batch process industries: A comparison between regression analysis and neural networks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 145(1), pages 14-30, February.
    8. Ben-Daya, M. & Al-Fawzan, M., 1998. "A tabu search approach for the flow shop scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 109(1), pages 88-95, August.
    9. Ruiz, Ruben & Stutzle, Thomas, 2007. "A simple and effective iterated greedy algorithm for the permutation flowshop scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 177(3), pages 2033-2049, March.
    10. Framinan, Jose M. & Leisten, Rainer & Ruiz-Usano, Rafael, 2002. "Efficient heuristics for flowshop sequencing with the objectives of makespan and flowtime minimisation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 141(3), pages 559-569, September.
    11. Fernandez-Viagas, Victor & Ruiz, Rubén & Framinan, Jose M., 2017. "A new vision of approximate methods for the permutation flowshop to minimise makespan: State-of-the-art and computational evaluation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 257(3), pages 707-721.
    12. Pan, Quan-Ke & Ruiz, Rubén, 2014. "An effective iterated greedy algorithm for the mixed no-idle permutation flowshop scheduling problem," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 41-50.
    13. Nowicki, Eugeniusz & Smutnicki, Czeslaw, 1996. "A fast tabu search algorithm for the permutation flow-shop problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 91(1), pages 160-175, May.
    14. Ruiz, Ruben & Maroto, Concepcion, 2005. "A comprehensive review and evaluation of permutation flowshop heuristics," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 165(2), pages 479-494, September.
    15. Angel A. Juan & Helena Ramalhinho-Lourenço & Manuel Mateo & Quim Castellà & Barry B. Barrios, 2012. "ILS-ESP: An efficient, simple, and parameter-free algorithm for solving the permutation flow-shop problem," Economics Working Papers 1319, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
    16. Fernando Luis Rossi & Marcelo Seido Nagano, 2022. "Beam search-based heuristics for the mixed no-idle flowshop with total flowtime criterion," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 44(4), pages 1311-1346, December.
    17. Martín Ravetti & Carlos Riveros & Alexandre Mendes & Mauricio Resende & Panos Pardalos, 2012. "Parallel hybrid heuristics for the permutation flow shop problem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 199(1), pages 269-284, October.
    18. Nearchou, A.C.Andreas C., 2004. "The effect of various operators on the genetic search for large scheduling problems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(2), pages 191-203, March.
    19. Blazewicz, Jacek & Domschke, Wolfgang & Pesch, Erwin, 1996. "The job shop scheduling problem: Conventional and new solution techniques," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 93(1), pages 1-33, August.
    20. Victor Fernandez-Viagas & Luis Sanchez-Mediano & Alvaro Angulo-Cortes & David Gomez-Medina & Jose Manuel Molina-Pariente, 2022. "The Permutation Flow Shop Scheduling Problem with Human Resources: MILP Models, Decoding Procedures, NEH-Based Heuristics, and an Iterated Greedy Algorithm," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(19), pages 1-32, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:ijsaem:v:9:y:2018:i:6:d:10.1007_s13198-018-0729-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.