IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wsi/ijtafx/v08y2005i08ns0219024905003402.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Proper Use Of Risk Measures In Portfolio Theory

Author

Listed:
  • SERGIO ORTOBELLI

    (University of Bergamo, Italy)

  • SVETLOZAR T. RACHEV

    (University of California, Santa Barbara and University of Karlsruhe, Germany)

  • STOYAN STOYANOV

    (FinAnalytica Inc., USA)

  • FRANK J. FABOZZI

    (Yale University, School of Management, 135 Prospect Street, CT 06520-8200, USA)

  • ALMIRA BIGLOVA

    (University of Karlsruhe, Germany)

Abstract

This paper discusses and analyzes risk measure properties in order to understand how a risk measure has to be used to optimize the investor's portfolio choices. In particular, we distinguish between two admissible classes of risk measures proposed in the portfolio literature: safety-risk measures and dispersion measures. We study and describe how the risk could depend on other distributional parameters. Then, we examine and discuss the differences between statistical parametric models and linear fund separation ones. Finally, we propose an empirical comparison among three different portfolio choice models which depend on the mean, on a risk measure, and on a skewness parameter. Thus, we assess and value the impact on the investor's preferences of three different risk measures even considering some derivative assets among the possible choices.

Suggested Citation

  • Sergio Ortobelli & Svetlozar T. Rachev & Stoyan Stoyanov & Frank J. Fabozzi & Almira Biglova, 2005. "The Proper Use Of Risk Measures In Portfolio Theory," International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance (IJTAF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 8(08), pages 1107-1133.
    • Handle: RePEc:wsi:ijtafx:v:08:y:2005:i:08:n:s0219024905003402
    DOI: 10.1142/S0219024905003402
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S0219024905003402
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1142/S0219024905003402?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Arreola Hernandez, Jose, 2014. "Are oil and gas stocks from the Australian market riskier than coal and uranium stocks? Dependence risk analysis and portfolio optimization," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 528-536.
    2. Giovanni Bonaccolto & Massimiliano Caporin & Sandra Paterlini, 2018. "Asset allocation strategies based on penalized quantile regression," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 1-32, January.
    3. José Antonio Climent Hernández, 2017. "Portafolios de dispersión mínima con rendimientos log-estables," Remef - Revista Mexicana de Economía y Finanzas Nueva Época REMEF (The Mexican Journal of Economics and Finance), Instituto Mexicano de Ejecutivos de Finanzas, IMEF, vol. 12(2), pages 49-69, Abril-Jun.
    4. Antonios Georgantas & Michalis Doumpos & Constantin Zopounidis, 2024. "Robust optimization approaches for portfolio selection: a comparative analysis," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 339(3), pages 1205-1221, August.
    5. Jose Arreola Hernandez & Mazin A.M. Al Janabi, 2020. "Forecasting of dependence, market, and investment risks of a global index portfolio," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(3), pages 512-532, April.
    6. Schuhmacher, Frank & Eling, Martin, 2012. "A decision-theoretic foundation for reward-to-risk performance measures," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 36(7), pages 2077-2082.
    7. Ortobelli, Sergio & Rachev, Svetlozar T. & Fabozzi, Frank J., 2010. "Risk management and dynamic portfolio selection with stable Paretian distributions," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 17(2), pages 195-211, March.
    8. Frank Fabozzi & Dashan Huang & Guofu Zhou, 2010. "Robust portfolios: contributions from operations research and finance," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 176(1), pages 191-220, April.
    9. José Antonio Climent-Hernández, 2017. "Portafolios de dispersión mínima con rendimientos log-estables Minimum dispersion portfolios with log-stable returns," Remef - The Mexican Journal of Economics and Finance, Instituto Mexicano de Ejecutivos de Finanzas. Remef, March.
    10. David E. Allen & Michael McAleer & Robert J. Powell & Abhay K. Singh, 2016. "Down-Side Risk Metrics as Portfolio Diversification Strategies across the Global Financial Crisis," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-18, June.
    11. Ankit Dangi, 2013. "Financial Portfolio Optimization: Computationally guided agents to investigate, analyse and invest!?," Papers 1301.4194, arXiv.org.
    12. Lin, Weidong & Taamouti, Abderrahim, 2024. "Portfolio selection under non-gaussianity and systemic risk: A machine learning based forecasting approach," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 40(3), pages 1179-1188.
    13. Schuhmacher, Frank & Auer, Benjamin R., 2014. "Sufficient conditions under which SSD- and MR-efficient sets are identical," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 239(3), pages 756-763.
    14. Farinelli, Simone & Ferreira, Manuel & Rossello, Damiano & Thoeny, Markus & Tibiletti, Luisa, 2009. "Optimal asset allocation aid system: From "one-size" vs "tailor-made" performance ratio," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 192(1), pages 209-215, January.
    15. Carla Oliveira Henriques & Maria Elisabete Neves & Licínio Castelão & Duc Khuong Nguyen, 2022. "Assessing the performance of exchange traded funds in the energy sector: a hybrid DEA multiobjective linear programming approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 313(1), pages 341-366, June.
    16. Rosella Giacometti & Sergio Ortobelli & Tomáš Tichý, 2015. "Portfolio Selection with Uncertainty Measures Consistent with Additive Shifts," Prague Economic Papers, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2015(1), pages 3-16.
    17. Brito, Irene, 2020. "A decision model based on expected utility, entropy and variance," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 379(C).
    18. Righi, Marcelo Brutti & Borenstein, Denis, 2018. "A simulation comparison of risk measures for portfolio optimization," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 105-112.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wsi:ijtafx:v:08:y:2005:i:08:n:s0219024905003402. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tai Tone Lim (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.worldscinet.com/ijtaf/ijtaf.shtml .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.