IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wsi/ijimxx/v13y2009i02ns136391960900225x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Toward A Dynamic Perspective On Open Innovation: A Longitudinal Assessment Of The Adoption Of Internal And External Innovation Strategies In The Netherlands

Author

Listed:
  • TOM POOT

    (Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 2, P. O. Box 80.115, 3508 TC Utrecht, The Netherlands)

  • DRIES FAEMS

    (University of Twente, Capitool 15, 7521 PL Enschede, The Netherlands)

  • WIM VANHAVERBEKE

    (Universiteit Hasselt, Agoralaan Gebouw D, 3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium)

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to contribute to a more dynamic perspective on open innovation by conducting a longitudinal analysis of the adoption of open innovation strategies. In order to do so, we rely on three comparable waves of the Dutch Community Innovation Survey, which were conducted in 1996, 2000 and 2004. The contributions of this study are twofold. First, this study is to our knowledge the first one to explicitly provide large-scale evidence of a paradigm shift from a closed to an open innovation model is taking place. At the same time, we provide evidence that this paradigm shift tends to occur in shocks instead of manifesting itself as a continuous process over time. Moreover, we show that the timing of these shocks differs across industries. Second, this study supports the assumption that internal and external innovation strategies are complements instead of substitutes.

Suggested Citation

  • Tom Poot & Dries Faems & Wim Vanhaverbeke, 2009. "Toward A Dynamic Perspective On Open Innovation: A Longitudinal Assessment Of The Adoption Of Internal And External Innovation Strategies In The Netherlands," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 13(02), pages 177-200.
    • Handle: RePEc:wsi:ijimxx:v:13:y:2009:i:02:n:s136391960900225x
    DOI: 10.1142/S136391960900225X
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S136391960900225X
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1142/S136391960900225X?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or search for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Arora, Ashish & Cohen, Wesley M. & Walsh, John P., 2016. "The acquisition and commercialization of invention in American manufacturing: Incidence and impact," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(6), pages 1113-1128.
    2. Liu, Weiwei & Tao, Yuan & Bi, Kexin, 2022. "Capturing information on global knowledge flows from patent transfers: An empirical study using USPTO patents," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(5).
    3. James Love & Stephen Roper & Priit Vahter, 2013. "Paradigm Shift or Business as Usual? Dynamic Complementarities in Innovation Strategies," Research Papers 0006, Enterprise Research Centre.
    4. Dong, John Qi & Netten, Jork, 2017. "Information technology and external search in the open innovation age: New findings from Germany," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 223-231.
    5. Guan, Jiancheng & Zhang, Jingjing & Yan, Yan, 2015. "The impact of multilevel networks on innovation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(3), pages 545-559.
    6. Pilar Bernal & Idana Salazar & Pilar Vargas, 2019. "Understanding the Open Innovation Trends: An Exploratory Analysis of Breadth and Depth Decisions," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-15, September.
    7. Ferraris, Alberto & Devalle, Alain & Ciampi, Francesco & Couturier, Jerome, 2019. "Are global R&D partnerships enough to increase a company's innovation performance? The role of search and integrative capacities," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    8. Cammarano, Antonello & Michelino, Francesca & Lamberti, Emilia & Caputo, Mauro, 2017. "Accumulated stock of knowledge and current search practices: The impact on patent quality," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 204-222.
    9. Pundziene, Asta & Sermontyte-Baniule, Rima & Rialp-Criado, Josep & Chesbrough, Henry, 2023. "Indirect effect of open innovation on clinical and economic value creation in digital healthcare: A comparative study of European countries," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    10. de Leeuw, Tim & Lokshin, Boris & Duysters, Geert, 2014. "Returns to alliance portfolio diversity: The relative effects of partner diversity on firm's innovative performance and productivity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(9), pages 1839-1849.
    11. Duong, Phuong-Anh Nguyen & Voordeckers, Wim & Huybrechts, Jolien & Lambrechts, Frank, 2022. "On external knowledge sources and innovation performance: Family versus non-family firms," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    12. Greco, Marco & Grimaldi, Michele & Cricelli, Livio, 2017. "Hitting the nail on the head: Exploring the relationship between public subsidies and open innovation efficiency," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 213-225.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Open innovation; external innovation; internal innovation;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O32 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D
    • O31 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wsi:ijimxx:v:13:y:2009:i:02:n:s136391960900225x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tai Tone Lim (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.worldscinet.com/ijim/ijim.shtml .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.